Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Check Point Software Technologies and JFrog are both solutions in the DevSecOps category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.7, while JFrog is ranked #16. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 4.9% mindshare in DSO, compared to JFrog’s 3.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of JFrog users who would recommend it.

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

Read 81 Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) reviews

12,844 Views
2,312 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Read 3 JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform reviews

4,050 Views
770 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 13, 2026

Check Point WAF and JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform compete in cybersecurity and DevOps management. Check Point WAF offers better pricing and support, while JFrog is preferred for its extensive features, justifying its higher cost.

Features: Check Point WAF provides advanced threat prevention, application protection, and customizable security policies. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform offers end-to-end DevOps automation, artifact management, and integration with CI/CD tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Check Point WAF is known for simple deployment and effective customer service. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform's deployment can be complex due to its integrated tools, but it also has supportive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Check Point WAF is cost-effective with quick ROI. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform, despite higher costs, provides long-term value with extensive capabilities for enterprise DevOps processes.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

Ranking in DevSecOps

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (4th), Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (6th), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (5th)

JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Ranking in DevSecOps

16th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Supply Chain Security (17th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the DevSecOps category, the mindshare of Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) is 4.9%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform is 3.6%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

DevSecOps Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)	4.9%
JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform	3.6%
Other	91.5%

DevSecOps

Featured Reviews

Krishnakumar Mahadevan

CISO at Spink Solutions Private Limited

Cloud security has strengthened risk posture and improved advanced threat visibility

There are some API gateway and API securities I mentioned. If these are incorporated with AI-related features, particularly those seven key vulnerabilities I mentioned—token theft and tool poisoning—that would be beneficial. AI-related features are not included yet in Check Point CloudGuard WAF. However, they are present in FortiGate. That is the advantage of FortiGate now. FortiGate is stopping all AI-related vulnerabilities now. FortiGate has this capability. It is unfortunate that even Palo Alto also lacks one or two of these features. Check Point Quantum is very good, without a doubt. However, their capabilities are not in comparison with Palo Alto. There are some features, but there are some gaps in comparison with Palo Alto.

Read full review

Fredierick Saladas

DevOps Lead at Standard Chartered Bank

Provides superior integration options and comprehensive reporting features

The product could benefit from enhanced integration capabilities with older software systems and more customizable reporting options. Improved support for mobile devices would also be advantageous, allowing team members to access the system more effectively while on the go. In the next release, we would like to see advanced analytics features, including predictive analytics to help forecast project outcomes. Additionally, a more robust mobile app with offline capabilities would be valuable for remote work scenarios.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Before CloudGuard, we periodically had some website issues. Since we've had CloudGuard, we've never had these issues happen again."

"Machine learning is a valuable tool for this assessment because it allows for a two-phase approach: secure and non-secure."

"The price of Check Point CloudGuard WAF is not expensive, as it was the cheapest solution we found."

"We have had a number of real events where developers accidentally made commits of API keys, and we were able to detect and begin response actions in minutes. We had the API key revoked in less than five minutes in such events."

"After integrating AppSec with other applications, team members can easily work without fear of confidential information exposure."

"Compared to other WAF solutions, Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) is user-friendly and very visible."

"The best features Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) offers in my experience are deployment, reliability, and scalability, and it has positively impacted my organization as a money saver and time saver by providing proper responses within 10 to 20 seconds, resolving queries quickly with excellent accuracy and reliability from its AI capabilities."

"The solution preemptively blocks zero-day attacks and detects hidden anomalies effectively."

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) pros

"The most valuable features include task tracking and reporting capabilities."

"I appreciate the features in JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform, especially the efficient file management where downloads and uploads are optimized, saving time. The storage efficiency is also great as it avoids redundancy, which is crucial for our team. It is also quite easy to use, especially for basic commands through the command line. It's straightforward for us internally, and our data is well-hosted on their servers, which makes data location and querying fast and efficient. Moving our storage to JFrog has streamlined our development cycle by eliminating duplicated data, which previously took up extra space locally. This efficiency is crucial for our workflow, although network speeds still play a significant role in performance."

"They have a professional service team that works alongside their engineering and performance teams."

Cons

"Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) could improve by addressing the new day-to-day attacks and issues that arise in the environment and globally dealing with attacks."

"Pricing is high, although possibly justified by the service received."

"The coding configurations can be simplified to save time for IT teams and developers."

"I advise proactive threat detection intelligence offline, which can also help monitor and ensure system checks and compliances are in place."

"There are occasions when it interfaces with other systems, leading to a loss of visibility."

"They might be able to add more integrations."

"CloudGuard WAF could improve UI simplicity, reduce false positives, and enhance policy management."

"A gap for improvement for Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) is the learning curve, as better training modules could help end customers, and pricing and reporting functionality could also be improved."

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) cons

"The product could benefit from enhanced integration capabilities with older software systems and more customizable reporting options."

"Our locations are in different environments, so the remote server takes time to catch up, causing replication delays. The engineering team suggested that this issue would be resolved, but I'm not sure if it has been addressed yet. This is more of a feature enhancement that we suggested."

"We have encountered stability issues lately, particularly with frequent 500 internal server errors. Despite efforts from our DevOps team to adjust settings, these issues persist, affecting our workflow, especially with machine learning data uploads. Overall, while it's beneficial for storage and accessibility, stability issues need improvement for seamless operations. The occasional occurrence of internal server errors takes several minutes to resolve on their own and can disrupt workflows. Another concern is that sometimes files appear to be successfully uploaded, but then they cannot be downloaded, with no error message indicating the issue during the upload process. This inconsistency needs to be addressed by JFrog to ensure reliable functionality for users like us."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I work for an Indian banking client. In India, companies are on a budget. The company liked Check Point very much, but it was a little bit costly compared to FortiWeb. However, it had more features compared to FortiWeb."

"As Infiniti customers, the pricing is manageable, as we have allowances dedicated to each Check Point product. The price is not as high compared to other options I have dealt with in the past."

"The base solution costs approximately 30,000 euros, with an additional 2,000 euros per year for licenses and support."

"It is not cheap, but it is worth it."

"I find the pricing to be reasonable."

"Check Point CloudGuard Application Security's pricing is not friendly."

"Check Point CloudGuard Application Security's pricing is comparable to other products in the market."

"Check Point CloudGuard WAF is expensive compared to Azure WAF."

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) pricing and cost advice

"The product pricing is competitive but worth negotiating for volume discounts or longer-term contracts."

"Regarding pricing, I focus on the platform's interface and user communication rather than costs."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which DevSecOps solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

31%

Comms Service Provider

14%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	57
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	40

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard for Application Security?

It is a little bit expensive, but the pricing model is acceptable, though a reduction would make it more competitive with leaders such as Palo Alto.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Application Security?

The false positive rate is a concern, but I could recommend improvements where false positives have to be minimized better. This all depends on how the rules are customized and configured, and it c...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudGuard for Application Security?

The main purpose is to have network security through machine learning, which can offer threat detection and intelligence for my endpoints, and I am looking for application security. I am looking fo...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

AWS WAF vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 5% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 5% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 5% of the time

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) Competitors

Checkmarx One vs JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Compared 15% of the time

GitLab vs JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Compared 14% of the time

Sonatype Lifecycle vs JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Socket vs JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

October 2026

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Download Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) product report

Buyer's Guide

Software Supply Chain Security

September 2026

Download JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform product report

Also Known As

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec, Check Point CloudGuard Code Security

No data available

Overview

Check Point WAF offers a robust security framework with AI-driven threat detection and seamless integration, protecting applications and APIs in multi-cloud environments.

Effective in preemptively blocking threats through AI and machine learning, Check Point WAF reduces false positives and operational workload. Its integration capabilities and threat intelligence provide comprehensive protection against zero-day attacks, while centralized management facilitates cost-effective and insightful threat reporting.

What are the main features of Check Point WAF?

AI and Machine Learning: Preemptively blocks threats without signature reliance.
Centralized Management: Simplifies oversight and reduces costs.
Threat Intelligence: Enhances security posture against zero-day attacks.
Ease of Deployment: Quick setup with user-friendly interface.
Comprehensive Protection: Guards against SQL injection and DDoS attacks.

What benefits should be considered by users?

Reduced False Positives: Minimizes operational interruptions.
Cost-effectiveness: Reduces management overhead.
Insightful Reporting: Enables swift response to threats.
Seamless Integration: Enhances security processes with existing tools.

Check Point WAF is employed in industries securing web applications and APIs, especially in multi-cloud environments. It effectively protects backend services, prevents unauthorized access, and monitors traffic, making it suitable for businesses with diverse infrastructures. It ensures compliance with security standards and adapts to fluctuating traffic patterns.

Check Point Software Technologies

The JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform optimizes software development life cycles through robust artifact management, CI/CD automation, and strong version control. Notable for its security features, it supports seamless software version maintenance and vulnerability scanning. Praised for enhancing organizational efficiency, it ensures faster, secure deliveries, improving collaboration within teams.

JFrog

Sample Customers

Orange España, Paschoalotto

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

September 2026

Free Report: Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform report.

See our list of best DevSecOps vendors.

We monitor all DevSecOps reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.