We performed a comparison between Check Point Security Management and Logsign Next-Gen SIEM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Check Point Security Management has improved our organization because all corporate firewalls can be managed with a single interface."
"The support is pretty incredible. Check Point has support rep programs that go all the way up to putting one of their own people in your business to help you. Then, they have support programs. If you're an expert, you just need to be able to download updated files and stuff. They have support programs like that, too."
"With the generation and review of logs, we have verified some vulnerabilities and attempted attacks to generate improvements in our infrastructure and policies to help avoid issues in the future."
"The firewall's blades are the solution's most valuable feature."
"HA Structure provides good coverage and works fine."
"The intuitive interface also allows new team members to adapt to the technology if they are not familiar with it initially. It doesn't take much for one to familiarize themselves with the product."
"Check Point has been very effective in terms of threat management and comprehensive protection against vulnerabilities, and it has given us confidence that our data is not going anywhere."
"The most valuable feature of Check Point Security Management is the high level of visibility"
"Logsign provides sample logs within the product, allowing users to see how logs will appear before integration, which is a valuable feature for testing and understanding log formats."
"I've found the solution was a bit unstable."
"It also offers compatibility with third-party security solutions, however, it is not a lot. This needs to be improved."
"The graphical interface is nice but it is a bit heavy."
"Installing a policy takes a very long time to complete."
"The reporting should be improved in future releases. It needs to be very explicit. This is very important."
"Sometimes the security system slows down when it is overloaded."
"You need some technical expertise to use the solution. I don't think it's accessible to the typical end-user. You need to access the box and use some command lines or the web interface. It would be nice to have a user-friendly dashboard and comprehensive reporting."
"We would like to improve the upgrade process in order to do mass upgrades to firewalls and to be able to upgrade target firewalls at the same time."
"I hope they address the pricing model for Logsign Next-Gen SIEM, especially regarding regional variations. The pricing should not differ based on the country of operation as it can lead to dissatisfaction among customers. A fixed pricing structure would be more favorable for us. I would also suggest enhancing the GUI interface and adding features similar to xFi Exchange from IBM Pure. This would streamline operations and save time for analysts."
More Check Point Security Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Security Management is ranked 9th in Log Management with 55 reviews while Logsign Next-Gen SIEM is ranked 44th in Log Management with 2 reviews. Check Point Security Management is rated 8.8, while Logsign Next-Gen SIEM is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Check Point Security Management writes "Great DDoS protection, high availability, and useful firewall rule implementation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Logsign Next-Gen SIEM writes "Easy to use and find the features that you need". Check Point Security Management is most compared with Wazuh, Fortinet FortiAnalyzer, IBM Security QRadar, LogRhythm SIEM and Splunk Cloud Platform, whereas Logsign Next-Gen SIEM is most compared with Grafana Loki, Wazuh, IBM Security QRadar, Logpoint and ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer. See our Check Point Security Management vs. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.