We performed a comparison between Check Point SandBlast Network and Check Point Security Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."In terms of the scalability, it's expandable across the cloud."
"Threat extraction can help us to remove malicious content from documents by converting them to PDF."
"The use of threat cloud protection with its artificial intelligence can automate possible threats."
"The sandbox is able to scan files without adding a delay or compromising productivity."
"It seems like it works all the time. We have never had an issue. We have never had something go undetected, anything major. All in all, it works pretty well."
"Check Point SandBlast Network Solution provides signature-based as well as zero-day threat protection. Also sandboxing can be performed on an on-premise device, cloud as well as the combination of both. Threat emulation is done on multiple OS & verdict is provided."
"The most efficient and protective characteristics of Check Point's SandBlast solution are that we can see a lot of this protection at the network and mail levels."
"The Check Point SandBlast Network gives us incredibly good features."
"The reporting system provides real-time insights into the security situation and shows measures that can be taken to protect our data."
"The additional features offered by the solution are excellent. We didn't have a lot fo these on a previous solution, and they've proven to be an advantage for us."
"We are now able to monitor the different VPN communities in real-time."
"The support is pretty incredible. Check Point has support rep programs that go all the way up to putting one of their own people in your business to help you. Then, they have support programs. If you're an expert, you just need to be able to download updated files and stuff. They have support programs like that, too."
"Check Point management is one of the most complete solutions for managing Check Point Firewall appliances."
"The solution is easy to use and comes with few vulnerabilities. You don't have to worry about release upgrades. Life cycle management is very easy."
"As the security administrator, who is responsible for the day-to-day tasks (e.g. creating new firewall rules, monitoring the security alerts and incidents etc.) and the maintenance (e.g. installing the new Jumbo Hotfixes), I find the Check Point Security Management R80.10 to be the great solution."
"We can track logs of each firewall which is very helpful."
"They need to improve the GUI interface."
"I would like if it could emulate bigger files and somehow improve this usability. I don't know if this would be possible. However, if it was able to scan or emulate bigger files, then it would be safer for a company using it."
"At the support level, they could improve the attention times and have the resolution of cases happen a little faster."
"I would like for them to improve the visibility in the product."
"Check Point SandBlast Network can improve the integration with third-party vendors, such as EDR or CRM products. For example, IBM Curator."
"I would like to see some speed improvements, e.g., how quickly you can get through all the menus. It crashes sometimes because we push so much through it. Therefore, I would like to see more small things behind the scenes, such as, back-end stability in terms of the management application."
"EDR and EPM solutions like Carbon Black or CyberArk have integrations with the cloud version of Sandblast, however, there must be on-premise Sandblast options also."
"The guides or best practices of Check Point are difficult to find for the client. Therefore, it is sometimes difficult to make better implementations."
"It would be great if the SmartView Monitor could become integrated into the SmartView Console Platform."
"It also offers compatibility with third-party security solutions, however, it is not a lot. This needs to be improved."
"In the last version from 80.20, there are some issues around SSNA Diction. I would like this to be improved."
"I would like it to be the administrator of equipment or Next Generation firewalls (which have to be managed on this platform) and to be able to manage other services (like Harmony) that also belong to Check Point."
"In future releases I'd like to see better integration with other applications and solutions. Also, the cost of the license is too high, it's too expensive."
"I've found the solution was a bit unstable."
"In the future, I would like the platform to be able to integrate or manage appliances or third-party equipment."
"While the console and administration work well, they have to work on performance since it consumes a lot of CPU and memory."
More Check Point SandBlast Network Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Check Point Security Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point SandBlast Network is ranked 8th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 33 reviews while Check Point Security Management is ranked 13th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 55 reviews. Check Point SandBlast Network is rated 8.4, while Check Point Security Management is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Check Point SandBlast Network writes "High detection with few false positives and able to handle large volumes of data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Check Point Security Management writes "Great DDoS protection, high availability, and useful firewall rule implementation". Check Point SandBlast Network is most compared with Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Fortinet FortiSandbox, Cisco Secure Network Analytics, Microsoft Defender for Office 365 and Trellix Network Detection and Response, whereas Check Point Security Management is most compared with Wazuh, Fortinet FortiAnalyzer, IBM Security QRadar, LogRhythm SIEM and Splunk Cloud Platform. See our Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Check Point Security Management report.
See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.
We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
