Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs ReversingLabs comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and ReversingLabs are both solutions in the Anti-Malware Tools category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.5, while ReversingLabs is ranked #43. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 0.6% mindshare in Anti-Malware Tools, compared to ReversingLabs’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ReversingLabs users who would recommend it.

Check Point Harmony SASE (f...

Read 62 Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) reviews

6,058 Views
424 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

ReversingLabs

Read 4 ReversingLabs reviews

1,660 Views
531 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Check Point Harmony SASE (f...

ReversingLabs

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

ReversingLabs and Check Point Harmony SASE compete in the cybersecurity domain. Check Point Harmony SASE has the upper hand with its comprehensive features, making it a choice for those prioritizing advanced capabilities.

Features: ReversingLabs provides robust threat intelligence, file reputation services, and deep insights into malicious activities. Check Point Harmony SASE offers a full security suite, including VPN, firewall, and zero-trust network access for comprehensive network protection. The main difference lies in ReversingLabs focusing on threat analysis, while Check Point Harmony SASE presents an integrated security solution.

Room for Improvement: ReversingLabs could expand its overall feature set beyond threat analysis to offer broader security solutions. Enhancing user training materials and documentation could further assist in user understanding. More flexible pricing options may attract a wider range of customers. Check Point Harmony SASE could benefit from improving integration capabilities with diverse IT environments, reducing setup complexity for non-technical users, and offering more granular control over user access settings to suit diverse organizational needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ReversingLabs is known for its streamlined deployment and responsive customer service, facilitating integration into existing systems. Check Point Harmony SASE provides a flexible cloud-based deployment model appealing to businesses seeking scalable solutions, and is noted for adaptability and effective customer engagement.

Pricing and ROI: ReversingLabs offers competitive pricing with significant ROI for targeted threat intelligence solutions, catering to specific security needs. Check Point Harmony SASE, although potentially incurring higher setup costs, delivers extensive ROI through its wide-ranging security features and enhanced protection, justifying investment for broader security demands.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. ReversingLabs Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. ReversingLabs

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Harmony SASE (f...

Ranking in Anti-Malware Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (7th), Firewalls (16th), Enterprise Infrastructure VPN (7th), ZTNA as a Service (4th), ZTNA (3rd), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (5th)

ReversingLabs

Ranking in Anti-Malware Tools

43rd

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (41st), Container Security (48th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (23rd), Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (33rd), Software Supply Chain Security (19th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Anti-Malware Tools category, the mindshare of Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) is 0.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReversingLabs is 0.8%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Anti-Malware Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)	0.6%
ReversingLabs	0.8%
Other	98.6%

Anti-Malware Tools

Featured Reviews

Nasseer Qureshi

Pre Sales Consultant at Redington Group

Delivers seamless and secure remote access while enhancing security posture

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) offers strong features, but there are areas that could be improved. One area for improvement is integration with third-party identity providers. It works with standard SAML and SSO, but we would prefer deeper integrations with solutions such as Ping for more advanced identity-based policies. Additionally, a mobile-specific client or lightweight agent would be helpful for securing access from smartphones, especially in BYOD environments. We would appreciate more granular reporting and analytics, including better drill-down capabilities to investigate specific users or app activity. The logs are comprehensive, but filtering them can sometimes feel messy. The user interface on the management portal could be more intuitive, especially when managing multiple sites or remote offices. Some of the policy configuration steps are nested and could be streamlined.

Read full review

Jesse Harris

Principal Solutions Architect at Tanium

Comes with a large sample size and helps t stay on top of emerging threats

The solution helps to stay on top of emerging threats with easy integration with other products. ReversingLabs has a large sample size. The solution needs to improve integrations. I have been using the solution for four to five years. ReversingLabs' stability is excellent. I rate the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It helps to quickly get access to the pages I need."

"It's improved the security of every single OS in the organization as well as the visibility and security capabilities."

"The tool is easy to use and set up."

"Perimeter 81 provides a very secure and non-disruptive experience."

"It has centralized management that allows administrators to supervise and control the security of the entire network."

"The solution provides high performance along with ATP prevention, policy management, remote activity, and IoT support."

"The characteristics that I have liked the most are the ease of implementation and administration."

"Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) strikes a great balance between security, usability, and scalability, especially for distributed and hybrid environments."

More Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) pros

"It offers reports on a great many more file types than the other analysis solutions we have. It can give us a more in-depth analysis and better reporting on a larger number of file types. It also gives us a more comprehensive score on a number of things as well, and that's why we're using it as a front-end filter. It gives us more information... It's valuable because of its depth of information, as well as the breadth it gives us. There aren't a lot of tools that cover all of the different file types."

"ReversingLabs has a large sample size."

"As far as the malware repository is concerned, it's extensive. It's a good source for finding samples, where we are unable to find them on other channels or by leveraging other sources."

"As far as static analysis information is concerned, we use most of the information that is available in order to determine whether or not we might be dealing with a malware variant. This includes information that is related to Java rules. This is also related to malware families indicated or specific malicious software variants that are labeled by name."

"The automated static analysis of malware is the most valuable feature. Its detection abilities are very good. It hits all of the different platforms out there, platforms that see the items in the wild."

Cons

"As it is a new market solution, I still face some instabilities in access at certain times of the day when I have more than 150 users using it simultaneously."

"Branding could be better."

"Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) could be improved as there's complexity during initial configuration, and there's a learning curve."

"Currently, I am not able to define a different country or location, which can result in negative experiences as the tool is being recognized by websites and this can make it difficult to access them or force me to disable the program temporarily."

"Perimeter 81 could enhance its reporting and analytics capabilities to provide more detailed insights into network activity."

"The overall UI could be improved and updated to bring a simpler feel to the application."

"If I were to be nitpicky, I would ask that Perimeter 81 offer the option for us to change the color of the graphical user interface, like maybe pink or green or so on."

"The main problem with Harmony Connect is that, because it's in a new category of offerings by Check Point, there's very little marketing of the product so far, and this means that many potential users don't even know this kind of solution is available. There are also few testimonials or case studies talking about people who have used the product and fell in love with it, for example."

More Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) cons

"While the company is very helpful, it would be very much appreciated to have extensive proof of concept scripts for the different APIs available, though not for all the APIs that we have purchased. Respective scripts are available, but those scripts which are available are typically not of very high quality."

"The product support could be better at times. Sometimes, the resources that they provide could be of higher quality."

"I would like to see if we could do a little bit more of bulk uploading of hash sets. Right now, I can only do them individually."

"The solution needs to improve integrations."

"We would really like further integration with our threat intelligence platform, which is called ThreatConnect. We would also really like further integrations with an endpoint protection product we use called Tanium. The reason I mentioned both of these is that ReversingLabs claims to have extensive integrations with both of them, but they did not work for us."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is neither cheap nor expensive."

"Perimeter 81 charges separately for gateways and VPN connectivity, but compared to Azure, it seemed more reasonable."

"The solution is priced appropriately considering its uses. For an essential license, a user pays only 30 USD per month. For an enterprise version, the prices can be negotiated with the company."

"Annual licenses cost $30 to $40 each."

"The cost of the solution's licenses depends on the particular use cases."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"Overall I am very happy with the solution’s flexibility and pricing."

"The pricing of Check Point is relatively high when compared to other competitors like Palo Alto and Fortinet. While Palo Alto may be on the higher side in terms of cost, Check Point's pricing is similar to that of Fortinet. In some cases, Check Point offers better value for the features it provides. We initially considered other options but ultimately decided to purchase hardware that came with three years of iOS. This approach eliminated the need for any additional costs associated with Check Point. I would rate it 10 out of 10."

More Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) pricing and cost advice

"Currently, the license number of lookups that we purchased has not been reached yet, because the integration has only recently been completed. However, our usage is expected and planned to increase over the next couple of months."

"We have a yearly contract based on the number of queries and malicious programs which can be processed."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Anti-Malware Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	53
Midsize Enterprise	18
Large Enterprise	15

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Perimeter 81?

Even after restarting, it tries to quickly reestablish connection which is very helpful.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Perimeter 81?

It's essential to consider the organization's specific requirements and budget. Here are some general recommendations: * Evaluate your needs * Understand pricing models * Request a quote * Compare ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Perimeter 81?

In terms of improvement, Perimeter 81 could enhance its reporting and analytics capabilities to provide more detailed insights into network activity. Additionally, expanding integration options wit...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

Compared 11% of the time

Netskope vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

Compared 10% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

Compared 9% of the time

OpenVPN Access Server vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco Umbrella vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

Compared 8% of the time

More Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Competitors

VirusTotal vs ReversingLabs

Compared 20% of the time

JFrog Xray vs ReversingLabs

Compared 12% of the time

IBM X-Force Exchange vs ReversingLabs

Compared 8% of the time

OPSWAT Filescan Sandbox vs ReversingLabs

Compared 8% of the time

Black Duck SCA vs ReversingLabs

Compared 8% of the time

More ReversingLabs Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

October 2025

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) report

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) product report

Buyer's Guide

ReversingLabs

September 2025

Download ReversingLabs product report

Also Known As

Check Point Quantum SASE

ReversingLabs Titanium, ReversingLabs secure.software

Overview

Check Point Harmony SASE, formerly Perimeter 81, offers robust security features like split tunneling, MFA, and Zero Trust Network Access focused on secure remote access and optimized connectivity for remote teams.

Check Point Harmony SASE delivers advanced security through a user-friendly interface, efficient VPN connections, and a centralized management console. It enhances security with real-time threat intelligence from ThreatCloud and traffic management via built-in optimization. Firewall as a Service and Secure Web Gateway safeguard against unauthorized access and phishing. While users seek enhanced networking customizations and better integration with identity providers, there's an emphasis on improving reporting, real-time analytics, and policy management. Requests also include a Chrome extension, traffic balancing, and simplified configuration to address some resource-intensive aspects.

What are the key features of Check Point Harmony SASE?

Split Tunneling: Manages internet traffic more efficiently by routing only necessary data through the VPN.
MFA: Provides an additional layer of security through multi-factor authentication.
Zero Trust Network Access: Ensures secure connections by validating every user and device.
ThreatCloud: Enhances protection with real-time threat intelligence.
Firewall as a Service: Protects against unauthorized access and threats.
Secure Web Gateway: Prevents phishing attacks and unauthorized internet access.

How can organizations benefit from using Check Point Harmony SASE?

Improved Security: Real-time threat intelligence and robust authentication minimize risks.
Centralized Management: Simplifies control over network security and policies.
Optimized Connectivity: Efficient traffic routing enhances user experience.
Flexible Integration: Seamlessly integrates with existing IT infrastructure, enhancing strategic security deployment.

Check Point Harmony SASE is used across industries for secure remote access and connectivity, protecting sensitive data, and managing access to corporate resources. It is ideal for those with hybrid cloud models and requires comprehensive security measures combined with existing IT infrastructures to meet specific industry demands.

Check Point Software Technologies

ReversingLabs is the trusted authority in software and file security. We provide the modern cybersecurity platform to verify and deliver safe binaries. Trusted by the Fortune 500 and leading cybersecurity vendors, the ReversingLabs Titanium Platform® powers the software supply chain and file security insights, tracking over 35 billion files daily with the ability to deconstruct full software binaries in seconds to minutes. Only ReversingLabs provides that final exam to determine whether a single file or full software binary presents a risk to your organization and your customers.

RL - Trust Delivered.

https://www.reversinglabs.com

ReversingLabs

Sample Customers

Aqua Security, Cognito, Multipoint, Kustomer, Postman, Meredith

Financial services, healthcare, government, manufacturing, oil & gas, telecommunications, information technology

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. ReversingLabs

September 2025

Free Report: Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. ReversingLabs

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. ReversingLabs and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. ReversingLabs report.

See our list of best Anti-Malware Tools vendors.

We monitor all Anti-Malware Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.