Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs ReversingLabs comparison

Check Point Harmony SASE (f...

Read 4 ReversingLabs reviews

1,589 Views
556 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

ReversingLabs and Check Point Harmony SASE compete in the cybersecurity domain. Check Point Harmony SASE has the upper hand with its comprehensive features, making it a choice for those prioritizing advanced capabilities.

Features: ReversingLabs provides robust threat intelligence, file reputation services, and deep insights into malicious activities. Check Point Harmony SASE offers a full security suite, including VPN, firewall, and zero-trust network access for comprehensive network protection. The main difference lies in ReversingLabs focusing on threat analysis, while Check Point Harmony SASE presents an integrated security solution.

Room for Improvement: ReversingLabs could expand its overall feature set beyond threat analysis to offer broader security solutions. Enhancing user training materials and documentation could further assist in user understanding. More flexible pricing options may attract a wider range of customers. Check Point Harmony SASE could benefit from improving integration capabilities with diverse IT environments, reducing setup complexity for non-technical users, and offering more granular control over user access settings to suit diverse organizational needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ReversingLabs is known for its streamlined deployment and responsive customer service, facilitating integration into existing systems. Check Point Harmony SASE provides a flexible cloud-based deployment model appealing to businesses seeking scalable solutions, and is noted for adaptability and effective customer engagement.

Pricing and ROI: ReversingLabs offers competitive pricing with significant ROI for targeted threat intelligence solutions, catering to specific security needs. Check Point Harmony SASE, although potentially incurring higher setup costs, delivers extensive ROI through its wide-ranging security features and enhanced protection, justifying investment for broader security demands.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. ReversingLabs Report (Updated: July 2025).

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. ReversingLabs

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Harmony SASE (f...

Ranking in Anti-Malware Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (6th), Firewalls (15th), Enterprise Infrastructure VPN (7th), ZTNA as a Service (4th), ZTNA (2nd), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (5th)

ReversingLabs

Ranking in Anti-Malware Tools

18th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (21st), Container Security (31st), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (11th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (14th), Software Supply Chain Security (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Anti-Malware Tools category, the mindshare of Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReversingLabs is 0.9%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Anti-Malware Tools

Featured Reviews

Nasseer Qureshi

Pre Sales Consultant at Redington Group

Delivers seamless and secure remote access while enhancing security posture

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) offers strong features, but there are areas that could be improved. One area for improvement is integration with third-party identity providers. It works with standard SAML and SSO, but we would prefer deeper integrations with solutions such as Ping for more advanced identity-based policies. Additionally, a mobile-specific client or lightweight agent would be helpful for securing access from smartphones, especially in BYOD environments. We would appreciate more granular reporting and analytics, including better drill-down capabilities to investigate specific users or app activity. The logs are comprehensive, but filtering them can sometimes feel messy. The user interface on the management portal could be more intuitive, especially when managing multiple sites or remote offices. Some of the policy configuration steps are nested and could be streamlined.

Read full review

Jesse Harris

Principal Solutions Architect at Tanium

Comes with a large sample size and helps t stay on top of emerging threats

The solution helps to stay on top of emerging threats with easy integration with other products. ReversingLabs has a large sample size. The solution needs to improve integrations. I have been using the solution for four to five years. ReversingLabs' stability is excellent. I rate the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has provided a seamless gateway to much-needed platforms."

"Using the preboot VPN option, we can reset a user who is working remotely that has forgotten their Windows login credentials."

"Customer service is excellent."

"It has centralized management that allows administrators to supervise and control the security of the entire network."

"The features are excellent, particularly the user interface and user accessibility."

"It is a scalable solution."

"Our investment in quality hardware has proven to provide a better customer experience. They heavily rely on Check Point Firewall and Check Point SaaS Connect to safeguard their networks from external threats and attacks."

"I rate the overall product as ten out of ten."

More Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) pros

"It offers reports on a great many more file types than the other analysis solutions we have. It can give us a more in-depth analysis and better reporting on a larger number of file types. It also gives us a more comprehensive score on a number of things as well, and that's why we're using it as a front-end filter. It gives us more information... It's valuable because of its depth of information, as well as the breadth it gives us. There aren't a lot of tools that cover all of the different file types."

"As far as static analysis information is concerned, we use most of the information that is available in order to determine whether or not we might be dealing with a malware variant. This includes information that is related to Java rules. This is also related to malware families indicated or specific malicious software variants that are labeled by name."

"As far as the malware repository is concerned, it's extensive. It's a good source for finding samples, where we are unable to find them on other channels or by leveraging other sources."

"The automated static analysis of malware is the most valuable feature. Its detection abilities are very good. It hits all of the different platforms out there, platforms that see the items in the wild."

"ReversingLabs has a large sample size."

Cons

"The support is not very good."

"Regarding the support, the schedules can be improved since they are generally in another geographical area, and it is difficult to solve the problems with the time differences between them and us."

"Sometimes, the product is very slow."

"The connectivity issue can be improved as at times it lags when connecting to their server."

"The access to the portal should be faster. It shouldn't crash a lot."

"There is a hefty cost"

"The solution's speed of upload and download is an area where it lacks"

"One of the more negative experiences using Perimeter 81 is the fact that I am logged off after a pre-determined amount of time which cuts off access to some of my company's resources."

More Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) cons

"We would really like further integration with our threat intelligence platform, which is called ThreatConnect. We would also really like further integrations with an endpoint protection product we use called Tanium. The reason I mentioned both of these is that ReversingLabs claims to have extensive integrations with both of them, but they did not work for us."

"While the company is very helpful, it would be very much appreciated to have extensive proof of concept scripts for the different APIs available, though not for all the APIs that we have purchased. Respective scripts are available, but those scripts which are available are typically not of very high quality."

"I would like to see if we could do a little bit more of bulk uploading of hash sets. Right now, I can only do them individually."

"The product support could be better at times. Sometimes, the resources that they provide could be of higher quality."

"The solution needs to improve integrations."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is neither cheap nor expensive."

"The pricing is good, especially when you compare it to other firewall or UTM solutions from FortiGate or SonicWall, where you would have to invest about four hundred thousand rupees for 100 users over a three-year period."

"I would rate Harmony Connect's pricing at six out of ten. It wasn't particularly expensive, but it wasn't super cheap either."

"The cost of the solution's licenses depends on the particular use cases."

"The solution's pricing model may not be suitable for smaller companies, as they might find it expensive. Larger companies tend to receive more value due to many users."

"Overall I am very happy with the solution’s flexibility and pricing."

"I consider the product to be a medium-priced solution. There are no additional costs attached to the tool."

"The product is reasonably priced."

More Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) pricing and cost advice

"Currently, the license number of lookups that we purchased has not been reached yet, because the integration has only recently been completed. However, our usage is expected and planned to increase over the next couple of months."

"We have a yearly contract based on the number of queries and malicious programs which can be processed."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Anti-Malware Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Perimeter 81?

Even after restarting, it tries to quickly reestablish connection which is very helpful.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Perimeter 81?

It's essential to consider the organization's specific requirements and budget. Here are some general recommendations: * Evaluate your needs * Understand pricing models * Request a quote * Compare ...

What needs improvement with Perimeter 81?

In terms of improvement, Perimeter 81 could enhance its reporting and analytics capabilities to provide more detailed insights into network activity. Additionally, expanding integration options wit...

What do you like most about ReversingLabs?

ReversingLabs has a large sample size.

What needs improvement with ReversingLabs?

The solution needs to improve integrations.

What advice do you have for others considering ReversingLabs?

I rate the product a ten out of ten.

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

Comparisons

Compared 10% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

Compared 9% of the time

Netskope vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco Umbrella vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

Compared 7% of the time

Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

Compared 6% of the time

More Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Competitors

VirusTotal vs ReversingLabs

Compared 23% of the time

JFrog Xray vs ReversingLabs

Compared 12% of the time

OPSWAT Filescan Sandbox vs ReversingLabs

Compared 9% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs ReversingLabs

Compared 9% of the time

Black Duck vs ReversingLabs

Compared 9% of the time

More ReversingLabs Competitors

Product Reports

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

August 2025

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) report

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) product report

Download ReversingLabs product report

August 2025

Also Known As

Check Point Quantum SASE

ReversingLabs Titanium, ReversingLabs secure.software

Overview

Check Point Harmony SASE, formerly Perimeter 81, offers robust security features like split tunneling, MFA, and Zero Trust Network Access focused on secure remote access and optimized connectivity for remote teams.

Check Point Harmony SASE delivers advanced security through a user-friendly interface, efficient VPN connections, and a centralized management console. It enhances security with real-time threat intelligence from ThreatCloud and traffic management via built-in optimization. Firewall as a Service and Secure Web Gateway safeguard against unauthorized access and phishing. While users seek enhanced networking customizations and better integration with identity providers, there's an emphasis on improving reporting, real-time analytics, and policy management. Requests also include a Chrome extension, traffic balancing, and simplified configuration to address some resource-intensive aspects.

What are the key features of Check Point Harmony SASE?

Split Tunneling: Manages internet traffic more efficiently by routing only necessary data through the VPN.
MFA: Provides an additional layer of security through multi-factor authentication.
Zero Trust Network Access: Ensures secure connections by validating every user and device.
ThreatCloud: Enhances protection with real-time threat intelligence.
Firewall as a Service: Protects against unauthorized access and threats.
Secure Web Gateway: Prevents phishing attacks and unauthorized internet access.

How can organizations benefit from using Check Point Harmony SASE?

Improved Security: Real-time threat intelligence and robust authentication minimize risks.
Centralized Management: Simplifies control over network security and policies.
Optimized Connectivity: Efficient traffic routing enhances user experience.
Flexible Integration: Seamlessly integrates with existing IT infrastructure, enhancing strategic security deployment.

Check Point Harmony SASE is used across industries for secure remote access and connectivity, protecting sensitive data, and managing access to corporate resources. It is ideal for those with hybrid cloud models and requires comprehensive security measures combined with existing IT infrastructures to meet specific industry demands.

Check Point Software Technologies

ReversingLabs is the trusted authority in software and file security. We provide the modern cybersecurity platform to verify and deliver safe binaries. Trusted by the Fortune 500 and leading cybersecurity vendors, the ReversingLabs Titanium Platform® powers the software supply chain and file security insights, tracking over 35 billion files daily with the ability to deconstruct full software binaries in seconds to minutes. Only ReversingLabs provides that final exam to determine whether a single file or full software binary presents a risk to your organization and your customers.

RL - Trust Delivered.

https://www.reversinglabs.com

Sample Customers

Aqua Security, Cognito, Multipoint, Kustomer, Postman, Meredith

Financial services, healthcare, government, manufacturing, oil & gas, telecommunications, information technology