Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs ReversingLabs comparison

Check Point Harmony SASE (f...

Read 4 ReversingLabs reviews

495 Views
288 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

ReversingLabs and Check Point Harmony SASE compete in the cybersecurity domain. Check Point Harmony SASE has the upper hand with its comprehensive features, making it a choice for those prioritizing advanced capabilities.

Features: ReversingLabs provides robust threat intelligence, file reputation services, and deep insights into malicious activities. Check Point Harmony SASE offers a full security suite, including VPN, firewall, and zero-trust network access for comprehensive network protection. The main difference lies in ReversingLabs focusing on threat analysis, while Check Point Harmony SASE presents an integrated security solution.

Room for Improvement: ReversingLabs could expand its overall feature set beyond threat analysis to offer broader security solutions. Enhancing user training materials and documentation could further assist in user understanding. More flexible pricing options may attract a wider range of customers. Check Point Harmony SASE could benefit from improving integration capabilities with diverse IT environments, reducing setup complexity for non-technical users, and offering more granular control over user access settings to suit diverse organizational needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ReversingLabs is known for its streamlined deployment and responsive customer service, facilitating integration into existing systems. Check Point Harmony SASE provides a flexible cloud-based deployment model appealing to businesses seeking scalable solutions, and is noted for adaptability and effective customer engagement.

Pricing and ROI: ReversingLabs offers competitive pricing with significant ROI for targeted threat intelligence solutions, catering to specific security needs. Check Point Harmony SASE, although potentially incurring higher setup costs, delivers extensive ROI through its wide-ranging security features and enhanced protection, justifying investment for broader security demands.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. ReversingLabs Report (Updated: April 2025).

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. ReversingLabs

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Harmony SASE (f...

Ranking in Anti-Malware Tools

7th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (5th), Firewalls (16th), Enterprise Infrastructure VPN (7th), ZTNA as a Service (5th), ZTNA (4th), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (7th)

ReversingLabs

Ranking in Anti-Malware Tools

18th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (25th), Container Security (26th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (12th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (12th), Software Supply Chain Security (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Anti-Malware Tools category, the mindshare of Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReversingLabs is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Anti-Malware Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer8099174

IT Help Support - Coop at DistillerSR

Secure access with an intuitive design and straightforward controls

In terms of improvement, Perimeter 81 could enhance its reporting and analytics capabilities to provide more detailed insights into network activity. Additionally, expanding integration options with a broader range of third-party tools would be beneficial for seamless compatibility with various existing systems. As for additional features in the next release, it would be great to see advanced threat detection and response capabilities integrated into the platform. This would further enhance security by proactively identifying and mitigating potential threats. Additionally, improved mobile device management features and more comprehensive user behavior analytics would be valuable additions to meet evolving cybersecurity needs.

Read full review

Jesse Harris

Principal Solutions Architect at Tanium

Comes with a large sample size and helps t stay on top of emerging threats

The solution helps to stay on top of emerging threats with easy integration with other products. ReversingLabs has a large sample size. The solution needs to improve integrations. I have been using the solution for four to five years. ReversingLabs' stability is excellent. I rate the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The setup is really easy...I rate the support team a ten out of ten."

"Providing access and security allows our company employees to work from home and remotely."

"The application control and granular access feature are very easy to use, intuitive, and effective."

"The features are excellent, particularly the user interface and user accessibility."

"The product’s ability to block phishing sites is valuable."

"Its software solution also ensures connectivity and protects against NSF filtering."

"It is a very stable solution."

"SD-WAN is one of the primary solutions offered by Perimeter 81."

More Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) pros

"ReversingLabs has a large sample size."

"The automated static analysis of malware is the most valuable feature. Its detection abilities are very good. It hits all of the different platforms out there, platforms that see the items in the wild."

"As far as static analysis information is concerned, we use most of the information that is available in order to determine whether or not we might be dealing with a malware variant. This includes information that is related to Java rules. This is also related to malware families indicated or specific malicious software variants that are labeled by name."

"It offers reports on a great many more file types than the other analysis solutions we have. It can give us a more in-depth analysis and better reporting on a larger number of file types. It also gives us a more comprehensive score on a number of things as well, and that's why we're using it as a front-end filter. It gives us more information... It's valuable because of its depth of information, as well as the breadth it gives us. There aren't a lot of tools that cover all of the different file types."

"As far as the malware repository is concerned, it's extensive. It's a good source for finding samples, where we are unable to find them on other channels or by leveraging other sources."

Cons

"The solution requires you to buy a minimum of 50 licenses and that is not practical."

"Currently, I am not able to define a different country or location, which can result in negative experiences as the tool is being recognized by websites and this can make it difficult to access them or force me to disable the program temporarily."

"Offering in-app explanations detailing what each feature does, its benefits and potential use cases can help users better understand and utilize the tool to its full potential."

"In mobile devices, there is also sometimes a bit of tear when it is via LTE, however, that must be due to connectivity."

"The connectivity issue can be improved as at times it lags when connecting to their server."

"One of the more negative experiences using Perimeter 81 is the fact that I am logged off after a pre-determined amount of time which cuts off access to some of my company's resources."

"One of our challenges is ensuring the security of our cloud-based operations."

"While the product has been instrumental in enhancing security, continuous improvement is essential. Feedback from users and ongoing technological advancements should guide the refinement of these security measures."

More Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) cons

"We would really like further integration with our threat intelligence platform, which is called ThreatConnect. We would also really like further integrations with an endpoint protection product we use called Tanium. The reason I mentioned both of these is that ReversingLabs claims to have extensive integrations with both of them, but they did not work for us."

"While the company is very helpful, it would be very much appreciated to have extensive proof of concept scripts for the different APIs available, though not for all the APIs that we have purchased. Respective scripts are available, but those scripts which are available are typically not of very high quality."

"The solution needs to improve integrations."

"I would like to see if we could do a little bit more of bulk uploading of hash sets. Right now, I can only do them individually."

"The product support could be better at times. Sometimes, the resources that they provide could be of higher quality."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate Harmony Connect's pricing at six out of ten. It wasn't particularly expensive, but it wasn't super cheap either."

"Regarding pricing, I can say that the more the number of users, the less they have to pay."

"The product's pricing model accommodates diverse needs and deployment sizes."

"I consider the product to be a medium-priced solution. There are no additional costs attached to the tool."

"The pricing of Check Point is relatively high when compared to other competitors like Palo Alto and Fortinet. While Palo Alto may be on the higher side in terms of cost, Check Point's pricing is similar to that of Fortinet. In some cases, Check Point offers better value for the features it provides. We initially considered other options but ultimately decided to purchase hardware that came with three years of iOS. This approach eliminated the need for any additional costs associated with Check Point. I would rate it 10 out of 10."

"Annual licenses cost $30 to $40 each."

"The cost of the solution's licenses depends on the particular use cases."

"Overall I am very happy with the solution’s flexibility and pricing."

More Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) pricing and cost advice

"Currently, the license number of lookups that we purchased has not been reached yet, because the integration has only recently been completed. However, our usage is expected and planned to increase over the next couple of months."

"We have a yearly contract based on the number of queries and malicious programs which can be processed."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Anti-Malware Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Perimeter 81?

Even after restarting, it tries to quickly reestablish connection which is very helpful.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Perimeter 81?

It's essential to consider the organization's specific requirements and budget. Here are some general recommendations: * Evaluate your needs * Understand pricing models * Request a quote * Compare ...

What needs improvement with Perimeter 81?

What do you like most about ReversingLabs?

ReversingLabs has a large sample size.

What needs improvement with ReversingLabs?

The solution needs to improve integrations.

What advice do you have for others considering ReversingLabs?

I rate the product a ten out of ten.

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

Comparisons

Compared 15% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

Compared 13% of the time

Netskope vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

Compared 9% of the time

Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

Compared 9% of the time

Cisco Umbrella vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

Compared 7% of the time

More Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Competitors

VirusTotal vs ReversingLabs

Compared 24% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs ReversingLabs

Compared 13% of the time

JFrog Xray vs ReversingLabs

Compared 13% of the time

Black Duck vs ReversingLabs

Compared 12% of the time

Snyk vs ReversingLabs

Compared 8% of the time

More ReversingLabs Competitors

Product Reports

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

May 2025

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) report

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) product report

Download ReversingLabs product report

April 2025

Also Known As

Check Point Quantum SASE

ReversingLabs Titanium, ReversingLabs secure.software

Overview

Perimeter 81 is a cloud-based network security and software-defined perimeter (SDP) solution designed to provide secure access to resources in the cloud, data centers, and on-premises environments. It offers a unified platform for organizations to manage and secure their network infrastructure, regardless of the location or type of resources.

Perimeter 81 Benefits:

Easy to use
Flexible access policies
Strong encryption and authentication protocols
Scalable
Compatible with various devices and platforms

Perimeter 81 Features:

Secure Network Access: Perimeter 81 provides secure access to internal resources and cloud-based applications through its client applications and gateways.
Software-Defined Perimeter (SDP): SDP is a security framework that focuses on dynamically creating secure connections between users and resources on a need-to-know basis.
Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA): Perimeter 81 follows the Zero Trust security model, which assumes that no user or device can be inherently trusted.
Multi-Cloud and Hybrid Cloud Support: Perimeter 81 is designed to secure access to resources across multi-cloud and hybrid cloud environments.
User and Device Management: The solution offers centralized user and device management capabilities, allowing administrators to define access policies, manage user roles, and enforce multi-factor authentication (MFA) for enhanced security.
Network Segmentation: Perimeter 81 enables organizations to segment their network resources, creating isolated environments based on logical groupings.
Centralized Management and Analytics: Perimeter 81 provides a centralized management console where administrators can configure and monitor their network security settings.

Reviews from Real Users

PeerSpot user, Frontend Developer at Limelight Networks, states that "We use some VPN solutions, and Perimeter 81 has the best user experience for desktop or mobile".

Daniel Goldfeld, Vice President of Customer Success at Mine - The All-in-One Privacy Suite, says that Perimeter 81 has "Great SAML and SCIM support with the ability to deploy site-2-site tunnels with specific IP restrictions".

Another PeerSpot user, Accounts Payable Specialist at Simera, writes that "The feature that I have found to be most valuable is the reputation that the company has regarding privacy. Nowadays, this is critical, especially when you do all of your work online."

Check Point Software Technologies

ReversingLabs is the trusted authority in software and file security. We provide the modern cybersecurity platform to verify and deliver safe binaries. Trusted by the Fortune 500 and leading cybersecurity vendors, the ReversingLabs Titanium Platform® powers the software supply chain and file security insights, tracking over 35 billion files daily with the ability to deconstruct full software binaries in seconds to minutes. Only ReversingLabs provides that final exam to determine whether a single file or full software binary presents a risk to your organization and your customers.

RL - Trust Delivered.

https://www.reversinglabs.com

Sample Customers

Aqua Security, Cognito, Multipoint, Kustomer, Postman, Meredith

Financial services, healthcare, government, manufacturing, oil & gas, telecommunications, information technology