Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs Klocwork comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and Perforce are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.8, while Perforce is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.2. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 0.3% mindshare in AS, compared to Perforce’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Perforce users who would recommend it.
Check Point CloudGuard WAF
Read 48 Check Point CloudGuard WAF reviews
  • 1,844 Views
  • 443 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Klocwork
Read 25 Klocwork reviews
  • 3,353 Views
  • 1,878 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Klocwork and Check Point CloudGuard WAF are key players in software security, each addressing distinct needs within the security domain. Users express higher satisfaction with Check Point CloudGuard WAF for its strong market fit and cloud protection efficiency, whereas Klocwork is appreciated for competitive pricing and effective support, hinting at superior cost-performance in some scenarios.

Features: Klocwork provides static code analysis, helps developers find vulnerabilities early, and offers integration with development environments. Check Point CloudGuard WAF focuses on cloud application protection, real-time threat intelligence, and comprehensive network shielding.

Room for Improvement: Klocwork could enhance scalability options, offer better CI/CD tool integration, and improve user interface features. Check Point CloudGuard WAF users seek ease in configurability, smoother setup processes, and better user onboarding experiences.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Klocwork is acknowledged for easy deployment and responsive customer service. Check Point CloudGuard WAF experiences mixed feedback on deployment complexity but benefits from a reliable support system.

Pricing and ROI: Klocwork is seen as a cost-effective solution with favorable ROI in development environments. Check Point CloudGuard WAF, while more expensive, provides significant security value, which users justify despite the higher costs.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Klocwork Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Klocwork
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.3
Organizations achieve up to 90% ROI with Check Point CloudGuard WAF, benefiting from enhanced security, cost savings, and efficiency.
Sentiment score
6.2
Klocwork enhances code quality and compliance, improving efficiency in defect resolution, especially in automotive sectors, despite ROI measurement challenges.
When we are attacked, we can understand how important the solution is.
When you migrate to the cloud, it feels like saving 90% of your time.
Most of the operations happen in the background, so I do not spend much time on it.
For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point CloudGuard WAF report
The main ROI factors include efficiency and how we meet compliance standards for various automotive requirements.
For more quotes and insights, download the Klocwork report
reviewer2619747 - PeerSpot reviewerThanos Constantopoulos - PeerSpot reviewerDialungana Malungo - PeerSpot reviewer
KG
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.8
Check Point CloudGuard WAF customer support is generally effective but needs improvement in response times and availability.
Sentiment score
6.8
Klocwork's support is praised for responsiveness, effective problem-solving, and reducing user contact via comprehensive documentation, despite prioritization issues.
They need to increase the number of people for 24/7 support.
They were responsive even before we committed to buying their solution.
I also received full technical support, especially during the implementation.
For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point CloudGuard WAF report
The customer support team is very responsive, proactive, and engages in conversations to ensure our needs are met.
The issue is not about the knowledge of the support but about the prioritization of the tickets they handle.
During the initial phase, there was a need for follow-ups and clarifications.
For more quotes and insights, download the Klocwork report
Dialungana Malungo - PeerSpot reviewer
SE
reviewer2619747 - PeerSpot reviewer
AA
KG
GR
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
Check Point CloudGuard WAF is highly scalable, effectively handles increased traffic, and benefits from traffic-based licensing and strong support.
Sentiment score
6.7
Klocwork is scalable, efficient, and integrates well with SAST tools, suitable for teams of all sizes without scalability issues.
If I need to scale, I open a Whatsapp group with the director and the team, and we quickly proceed to do so.
They have sufficient resources, and there are no challenges from a scalability perspective.
It handles increasing traffic easily because we can extend our demands based on our needs.
For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point CloudGuard WAF report
Klocwork supports our scalability needs without issues, even as project volumes increase.
The program-to-program enablement is scalable.
For more quotes and insights, download the Klocwork report
reviewer2619747 - PeerSpot reviewerMantu Shaw - PeerSpot reviewerHailemichael Yigrem - PeerSpot reviewer
AA
PM
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
Check Point CloudGuard WAF is highly stable, offering robust performance and minimal downtime with rare disruption instances.
Sentiment score
6.8
Klocwork is reliable and stable, effectively handling large codebases but requires significant computing power and faster updates.
It is very stable.
It is very stable, never crashing or giving me an error that I can see.
I did not have any issues in the last three years during which I had more than ten critical services running on CloudGuard.
For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point CloudGuard WAF report
Installation is easy, and the solution is stable.
For more quotes and insights, download the Klocwork report
RF
Rui Dias - PeerSpot reviewerCharalampos Symeou - PeerSpot reviewer
GR
 

Room For Improvement

Check Point CloudGuard WAF needs interface, monitoring, documentation, pricing improvements, AI integration, easier setup, and enhanced mobile protection.
Klocwork needs improved language support, flexible reporting, better integration with Agile DevOps, and enhanced static and dynamic analysis.
The provider could improve by providing better guidance and support during the configuration process.
It's not something you manipulate, it's not an antivirus where you deal with signatures, updates, and upgrades every day.
I would say that the more automation this product has, the easier it will be to work with it.
For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point CloudGuard WAF report
There are too many warnings, and it requires expertise to determine the correct category for them.
Klocwork sometimes provides too many additional warnings which require expertise to manage.
We would like Klocwork to connect to Git and notify developers of issues tied to specific commits.
For more quotes and insights, download the Klocwork report
SE
reviewer2619747 - PeerSpot reviewerBaruch Peretz - PeerSpot reviewer
GR
PM
AA
 

Setup Cost

Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers flexible, subscription-based pricing with competitive features, though costs can exceed alternatives like Azure WAF and FortiWeb.
Klocwork's flexible pricing models are valued, though opinions vary on cost-effectiveness, catering to diverse organizational needs.
It is more expensive than f5, where we purchased everything as bundles, and Check Point costs more, but it is worth the money.
It is less costly than Cloudflare, Fortinet, and other vendors.
I know that its price is relatively expensive compared to other products but it gives benefits that are worth it.
For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point CloudGuard WAF report
It is less expensive than Coverity.
The solution is not very cheap, however, it is less expensive than Coverity.
Klocwork was competitively priced, making it a cost-effective solution for us.
For more quotes and insights, download the Klocwork report
reviewer2619747 - PeerSpot reviewerMantu Shaw - PeerSpot reviewerBaruch Peretz - PeerSpot reviewer
PM
GR
AA
 

Valuable Features

Check Point CloudGuard WAF provides advanced security, easy integration, AI threat detection, and compliance, enhancing control and visibility.
Klocwork provides efficient static code analysis with strong IDE integration, supporting multiple languages and enhancing code quality and collaboration.
Upon implementation and evaluation with third-party penetration testing, it meets rigorous security standards required for dealing with financial institutions.
It can protect against zero-day attacks and hidden anomalies.
The solution preemptively blocks zero-day attacks and detects hidden anomalies effectively.
For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point CloudGuard WAF report
The most valuable feature of Klocwork is the static analysis tools, which help identify potential security threats and errors.
Its integration with the CI/CD pipeline has helped streamline the software development process.
It takes just half a day to set up.
For more quotes and insights, download the Klocwork report
SE
DC
Charalampos Symeou - PeerSpot reviewer
AA
KG
GR
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point CloudGuard WAF
Ranking in Application Security Tools
7th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
48
Ranking in other categories
Web Application Firewall (WAF) (10th)
Klocwork
Ranking in Application Security Tools
19th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
25
Ranking in other categories
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (17th), Static Code Analysis (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Check Point CloudGuard WAF is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Klocwork is 1.4%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Check Point CloudGuard WAF0.3%
Klocwork1.4%
Other98.3%
Application Security Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Dialungana Malungo - PeerSpot reviewer
Protects our web applications and APIs and has a very low false positive rate
CloudGuard WAF is a very straightforward solution. I do not have to worry about signatures. Most of the solutions that are out there are mainly based on signatures, and I have to do a lot of maintenance to get the signature updates, and sometimes, due to a lack of resources, I am not able to do so. With CloudGuard WAF, I have peace of mind, because most of the features are AI-based, and there is not much configuration that needs to be done on my side. Once set, I only go to CloudGuard WAF to check. I do not have to worry about signatures or updates. Everything is done perfectly, and I have a sense of peace because I know our applications are safe. It is very important for us that CloudGuard WAF protects our applications against threats without relying on signatures. That is definitely one of the key features I need.
Read full review
AnirbanSarkar - PeerSpot reviewer
Lets you find defects during the development phase, so you don't have to wait till the development is over to find and address flaws
What needs improvement in Klocwork, compared to other products in the market, is the dashboard or reporting mechanisms that need to be a bit more flexible. The Klocwork dashboard could be improved. Though it's good, it's not as good as some of the other products in the market, which is a problem. The reporting could be more detailed and easier to sort out because sorting in Klocwork could be a bit more time-consuming, mainly when sorting defects based on filters, compared to how it's done on other tools such as Coverity. What I'd like added in the next release of Klocwork is the peer code review Cahoots which used to be a part of Klocwork, and the architecture analysis and both have been taken out of Klocwork. I found the two critical for specific deployments, so if those can be brought back to Klocwork, that would be very good.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
20%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Government
6%
Manufacturing Company
26%
Computer Software Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Transportation Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business25
Midsize Enterprise18
Large Enterprise16
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise12
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CloudGuard for Application Security?
We have not had any incidents. We could realize its benefits immediately. We watched and monitored the traffic, and it was amazing to see the results.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard for Application Security?
I don't know about the pricing, setup cost, or licensing for Check Point CloudGuard WAF, as I don't manage costs.
See all answers
What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Application Security?
Check Point CloudGuard WAF can be improved; initially, the setup is very complicated, and there's not a lot of documentation available, plus it didn't have something for anti-bot, but other than th...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Klocwork?
Klocwork's pricing seems attractive, as it uses a per-user license model that does not have a lot of overhead.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Klocwork?
One area for improvement is that when customers use different static analysis tools, they report more issues compared to Klocwork. The static analysis engine of Klocwork has areas that need improve...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Klocwork?
I work on tools such as Klocwork, LDRA, as well as Jira and Confluence, focusing more on the software quality assurance aspect. We use Klocwork for coding and aggregate checks. We use it for static...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
Imperva Application Security Platform vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF
Compared 19% of the time
F5 Advanced WAF vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
F5 Advanced WAF vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF
Compared 14% of the time
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF
Compared 12% of the time
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF
Compared 11% of the time
open-appsec vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
open-appsec vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF
Compared 10% of the time
More Check Point CloudGuard WAF Competitors
Coverity Static vs Klocwork Logo
Coverity Static vs Klocwork
Compared 28% of the time
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Klocwork Logo
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Klocwork
Compared 27% of the time
Polyspace Code Prover vs Klocwork Logo
Polyspace Code Prover vs Klocwork
Compared 14% of the time
Helix QAC vs Klocwork Logo
Helix QAC vs Klocwork
Compared 6% of the time
Axivion Static Code Analysis vs Klocwork Logo
Axivion Static Code Analysis vs Klocwork
Compared 5% of the time
More Klocwork Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Check Point CloudGuard WAF
October 2025
Check Point CloudGuard WAF reportDownload Check Point CloudGuard WAF product report
Buyer's Guide
Klocwork
September 2025
Klocwork reportDownload Klocwork product report
 

Also Known As

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec
No data available
 

Overview

Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers advanced security for web applications and APIs with features such as intrusion prevention, bot prevention, and AI-driven threat detection, ensuring organizations achieve high-level protection and efficient security management.

Check Point CloudGuard WAF integrates with APIs, providing a seamless security enhancement while reducing false positives. Its scalability supports rapid deployment, valuable for companies aiming to secure resources in clouds like AWS and Azure. Enhanced threat prevention, comprehensive compliance support, and advanced threat protection methods such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting prevention are key strengths. Despite its robust capabilities, there are opportunities for improvement, such as lower costs, improved third-party tool integration, and a more intuitive interface to enhance usability.

What are the key features of Check Point CloudGuard WAF?
  • Intrusion Prevention System: Effectively detects and blocks unauthorized access attempts.
  • Bot Prevention: Shields applications from malicious bot traffic.
  • AI-driven Threat Detection: Uses advanced algorithms to identify and mitigate threats.
  • Log Management: Offers extensive logging capabilities for tracking and analysis.
  • Scalability: Supports rapid deployment across different environments, including multi-cloud.
What benefits should users expect from Check Point CloudGuard WAF?
  • Security Efficiency: Combines high-grade protection with ease of use to simplify security management.
  • Cost Efficiency: Aids in effective resource utilization, minimizing overhead.
  • Compliance Support: Helps meet various industry standards effortlessly.
  • Enhanced Threat Protection: Provides robust safeguards against common web vulnerabilities.

Check Point CloudGuard WAF is predominantly applied within industries requiring stringent security standards, such as financial services, healthcare, and e-commerce. Its deployment strengthens the defense of critical APIs, facilitates compliance, and supports efficient multi-cloud security management, aligning well with evolving industry demands.

Check Point Software Technologies

Klocwork detects security, safety, and reliability issues in real-time by using this static code analysis toolkit that works alongside developers, finding issues as early as possible, and integrates with teams, supporting continuous integration and actionable reporting.

Perforce
 

Sample Customers

Orange España, Paschoalotto
ACCESS Co Ltd, Risk-AI, Winbond Electronics, Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute, University of Southern California, Alebra Technologies, SIMULIA, Risk Management Solutions, Brigham Young University, SRD, HRL
Buyer's Guide
Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Klocwork
September 2025
Free Report: Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Klocwork
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Klocwork and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Klocwork report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.