

HCL AppScan and Check Point WAF compete in the web and application security category. Check Point WAF seems to have the upper hand with its AI-driven threat detection and lower false positive rate, while HCL AppScan excels in comprehensive scanning within the software development lifecycle.
Features: HCL AppScan is favored for its features like API scanning, integration with the SDLC, and support for static and dynamic scans, making it versatile across various environments. Check Point WAF offers robust AI-driven threat detection, protects against zero-day attacks, and operates without relying on signature updates, making it effective for deployed applications.
Room for Improvement: HCL AppScan requires better scanning speed for large sites, enhanced central management, and integration for container usage. Check Point WAF could improve its onboarding process, simplify initial setups, and improve its pricing model, along with providing better documentation and support.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HCL AppScan is lauded for its versatility in on-premises and cloud deployments, with generally favorable support feedback despite needing faster response times. Check Point WAF is noted for its scalability across cloud environments but criticized for complicated initial setups and occasionally unresponsive customer support.
Pricing and ROI: HCL AppScan is perceived as costly with its token use model but provides significant ROI by reducing vulnerabilities. Check Point WAF offers competitive pricing, albeit slightly higher than some rivals, while both solutions demonstrate substantial ROI, with HCL AppScan users particularly noting cost savings and risk mitigation over time.
When we are attacked, we can understand how important the solution is.
When you migrate to the cloud, it feels like saving 90% of your time.
Most of the operations happen in the background, so I do not spend much time on it.
They need to increase the number of people for 24/7 support.
They were responsive even before we committed to buying their solution.
I also received full technical support, especially during the implementation.
Veracode provides excellent assistance and regularly scheduled calls to address customer concerns and updates.
There is still room for improvement when it comes to the speed of response.
If I need to scale, I open a Whatsapp group with the director and the team, and we quickly proceed to do so.
They have sufficient resources, and there are no challenges from a scalability perspective.
Check Point CloudGuard WAF's scalability is very good.
It is very stable.
It is very stable, never crashing or giving me an error that I can see.
I did not have any issues in the last three years during which I had more than ten critical services running on CloudGuard.
Since we've been using HCL AppScan for about three months, we really have not encountered a false positive.
The provider could improve by providing better guidance and support during the configuration process.
Future releases should include better bot mitigation, behavioral anomaly detection, compliance templates, advanced threat intel integration, and streamlined multi-cloud support to boost protection and usability.
A machine learning-based adaptive mode could help the WAF learn over time and auto-tune policies.
If I'm scanning a web application, it shows me the various components being used. It tells me whether I have Java libraries, .NET frameworks, or other log management libraries such as Log4j, and what versions of those specific components are present.
It is more expensive than f5, where we purchased everything as bundles, and Check Point costs more, but it is worth the money.
It is less costly than Cloudflare, Fortinet, and other vendors.
I know that its price is relatively expensive compared to other products but it gives benefits that are worth it.
Companies often choose based on budget constraints, with Veracode being on the higher end cost-wise.
Upon implementation and evaluation with third-party penetration testing, it meets rigorous security standards required for dealing with financial institutions.
It can protect against zero-day attacks and hidden anomalies.
The solution preemptively blocks zero-day attacks and detects hidden anomalies effectively.
AppScan's most valuable features include its ability to identify vulnerabilities accurately, provide detailed remediation steps, and the newly introduced AI-powered features that enhance its functionality further.
I have utilized its interactive application security testing, as well as both static application security testing, dynamic application security testing, and IAST.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) | 0.6% |
| HCL AppScan | 2.3% |
| Other | 97.1% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 38 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 21 |
| Large Enterprise | 21 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 14 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 31 |
Check Point WAF uses AI-driven threat prevention with seamless API integration, offering advanced DDoS protection. It auto-learns attack patterns, updates protection, and minimizes false positives. Its interface simplifies policy management for secure web applications across cloud environments.
Check Point WAF combines AI-driven threat detection with streamlined policy management to provide effective security for web applications and APIs. It offers zero-day protection, threat intelligence, and advanced DDoS protection. Users enjoy robust logging and compliance management across multi-cloud environments. Integration is smooth, with reduced reliance on signatures, facilitating multi-layer security. Despite its strengths, users note areas for improvement, such as latency and pricing, and call for enhancements in API security, real-time monitoring, and reporting. Challenges include integration complexity and limited technical support accessibility. Effective application security across dynamic environments is a key offering.
What are Check Point WAF's key features?Check Point WAF finds particular relevance in industries requiring robust cybersecurity measures such as finance, healthcare, and e-commerce. These sectors benefit from its advanced threat detection and adaptive security policy management, crucial for securing sensitive data across multi-cloud infrastructures. By managing API usage efficiently, it helps maintain regulatory compliance while ensuring optimal operation. Enhanced traffic logging and malware threat management add to its appeal for organizations focusing on securing transactions and sensitive information.
HCL AppScan offers quick vulnerability detection with effective SDLC integration and is known for its user-friendly interface and seamless security integration.
HCL AppScan provides dynamic and static scanning to identify vulnerabilities like XSS and SQL injection. It integrates well into CI/CD pipelines, supports multiple languages, and offers web and dynamic scanning, helping businesses ensure security across development lifecycles. Users benefit from API coverage, Postman integration, and its ability to function in cloud and on-premise environments, facilitating a shift from DevOps to DevSecOps practices.
What features define HCL AppScan?HCL AppScan is leveraged in sectors requiring rigorous security checks, such as finance and healthcare, where it conducts comprehensive scans and offers insights into potential vulnerabilities. Its robust scanning capabilities aid companies in maintaining compliance and security standards.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.