We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard WAF and FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."The tool helps us to block IPs and applications."
"User attitude reviews help us keep all online users compliant with company regulations and policies."
"The solution offers sophisticated security techniques with unique characteristics that can be particularly valuable for the financial sector, which is where we develop apps."
"The portal is quite intuitive."
"It helps us streamline our revenue streams, and we're spending less money on application security."
"It provides advanced analytics that gives each team time to prepare for any threat that might occur in the future."
"The features I have found most valuable are the comprehensive threat prevention capabilities, automated policy management, and seamless integration with cloud environments."
"The solution offers continuous security monitoring and alerting, which can help organizations detect and respond to security incidents in real time."
"It is good for web tracking applications."
"The fact that I can log into the platform and see everybody, see logs, authentication failure, and see everything on one platform, is the most valuable feature."
"FortiWeb Web Application Firewall blocks attacks from application layers and provides protection."
"The platform's stability is good."
"The initial setup was easy since it was possible to get remote support for the product."
"We use it to secure VMs and applications. It protects against DDoS attacks. It's very user-friendly."
"The machine learning on FortiWeb WAF is valuable."
"The tool's HTTP traffic, website fixing, and blocking are fantastic. It is user-friendly with easy configuration."
"I feel like I need more clarity in understanding pricing for DDoS protection."
"One of the big problems we found in Check Point, in general, is the support."
"I would like to be able to integrate the theme of Artificial Intelligence to help review issues and to monitor and view the security issue while also suggesting and interpreting and additionally configuring solutions - basically, acting as an interpreter."
"I have faced issues with the tool's blocking aspects. It is hard to open or block web services due to the multitude of cloud centers. I have to do the process manually at times. We have a bug which is hard to solve."
"Improving the process for handling licensing renewals would be a welcome enhancement."
"CloudGuard for Application Security, like the other Check Point applications, has been presenting major latency problems when entering their administrative portal."
"In terms of features, I do not have any negatives. Their integration is extremely quick. It is better than others I have been involved with in the past. Their pricing model, however, can be better."
"The creation of security profiles for each application takes a lot of time."
"We have encountered issues with webhooks and management of FortiWeb Web Application Firewall's on-premise version."
"The product lacks features offered by enterprise-level firewall tools."
"The documentation is poor."
"FortiWeb Web Application Firewall's signature database updates could be improved."
"There is room for improvement in the support. The response time could be faster. Plus, they ask for a lot of information. It is not easy to get support."
"The product is complicated to set up."
"WAF needs more signatures on FortiWeb and updates the database continuously to protect against new attacks."
"FortiWeb Web Application Firewall needs to improve its performance."
More FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point CloudGuard WAF is ranked 13th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 29 reviews while FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) is ranked 16th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 13 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard WAF is rated 9.0, while FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard WAF writes "Automation capabilities also help streamline security processes and smooths down API integration processes and detects API availability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) writes "Protects internal applications and prevents target attacks ". Check Point CloudGuard WAF is most compared with SonarQube and Checkmarx One, whereas FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) is most compared with F5 Advanced WAF and Azure Front Door.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
