

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP and Tenable Vulnerability Management both compete in the cloud security category. CloudGuard is seen as having an advantage for users needing advanced access controls and compliance features, while Tenable stands out for those requiring comprehensive vulnerability management.
Features: Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP offers advanced IAM role control, dynamic access, and compliance reporting which provide integrated threat intelligence and detailed visibility across cloud platforms. It also features predictive security management and efficient policy enforcement, helping streamline compliance processes. Tenable Vulnerability Management is known for robust vulnerability management capabilities, with extensive scanning and asset visibility for cloud and on-premises environments.
Room for Improvement: Check Point CloudGuard users request better third-party integration, enhanced documentation, and a reduction in false positives. Improvements in cost-effectiveness and quicker performance updates are also desired. Tenable Vulnerability Management could enhance its reporting capabilities, dashboard customization, and user interface for a more intuitive experience, with increased integration options and support for multi-cloud environments being beneficial.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is primarily used in public cloud and hybrid environments, with users noting its ease of deployment and comprehensive customer service. Its intuitive setup is often praised on platforms like AWS and Azure, though on-premises integration can be complex. Tenable Vulnerability Management offers a wide range of deployment options, including public, private, and hybrid clouds. Customer service is generally positive, although faster, more responsive support during complex deployments is suggested.
Pricing and ROI: Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is moderately priced, with costs tied to cloud asset usage and features utilized, delivering significant ROI through security efficiency and reduced manual oversight. Tenable Vulnerability Management is seen as relatively costly, especially for SMBs, due to its all-encompassing license structure. Despite higher costs, Tenable provides a strong ROI by effectively identifying and mitigating vulnerabilities.
The compliance has improved as our overall compliance score against CIS benchmark has improved from around 72 to 92% within the first three months of adoption.
This helped my team cut manual review time by roughly twenty to twenty-five percent, allowing me to reallocate effort to proactive cloud security improvements.
Monitoring cloud security automatically ensures a return on investment.
When I need help or have open questions, or if I require the capability to deploy a quick test environment, there are always people I can contact at Check Point to get my information or the environment as fast as I need it.
I have a dedicated support engineer and a presales engineer dedicated to me.
Customer support for Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP has been responsive and knowledgeable.
It needs improvement in response time and addressing feature requests promptly.
The technical support of Tenable Vulnerability Management is available 24/7, and whenever we require support, we can get it within five minutes.
We had used Tenable's expert support services in order to make sure that we run Tenable Vulnerability Management on a continuous basis and are able to utilize their services.
Visibility scales without performance issues as my environment expands.
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP scales efficiently in the multi-cloud environment.
I never had any performance-related issues.
They can seamlessly scale the number of endpoints from 100 to 1,000,000 in a day.
Tenable Vulnerability Management is highly scalable.
With the growing needs of our company, Tenable Vulnerability Management is able to safely adapt.
If there are errors, it is sometimes challenging to elaborate or troubleshoot since it is not transparent enough to understand what to search for.
It is rapidly evolving, and sometimes mistakes occur, necessitating testing.
I have faced no stability issues with Tenable.
The stability is commendable, and I would rate Tenable ten out of ten.
The stability of Tenable Vulnerability Management is highly reliable.
I need more integration from the code-to-cloud principle.
It would be nice to have periodic updates on what people should do, maybe with some analysis or something.
I require consistency in the user interface to ensure everything is streamlined into the same look and feel.
They should also accelerate the process of implementing new features upon request.
I would suggest HP WebInspect as a better option than Tenable.io.
Tenable Vulnerability Management is not very effective for real-time risk prioritization for our organization's security strategy.
In terms of ROI, we can see time savings for audit preparation of at least 30-40%.
It is not cheap, of course, yet it is a necessity.
From a licensing and cost perspective, it is really competitive.
Tenable charges around $40 per device, while Rapid7 costs $10 to $15 per device.
I would not say very expensive for Tenable Vulnerability Management; it is not prohibitive, but at the same time, there are some other tools in the marketplace which are offering the same kind of services that Tenable offers, the same kind of features that Tenable has offered at a lesser cost.
One of the main reasons we use the solution is that it is great at identifying risks that are critical to our business.
The CDR helps detect anomalous behavior and respond to threats before they become an issue.
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP offers a unified, modular platform that combines CSPM, CWPP, CIEM, code security, and cloud detection and response.
Tenable enables vulnerability management through potential AI integration that consolidates efforts and resolves multiple vulnerabilities simultaneously.
The main benefit of integration with Tenable Vulnerability Management is that there will be no lack of missing vulnerabilities when it comes to the patching environment.
The best features of Tenable Vulnerability Management are flexibility, breadth and scope, and the fact that their current vulnerabilities come out, and they have tests for them within a day or two.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Tenable Vulnerability Management | 3.1% |
| Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP | 1.2% |
| Other | 95.7% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 55 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 18 |
| Large Enterprise | 56 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 21 |
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP offers comprehensive cloud security with features like dynamic access control, asset protection, and compliance checks, tailored for organizations seeking enhanced governance across AWS, Azure, and GCP platforms.
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP provides robust capabilities, including centralized firewall management, IAM scanning, and real-time visibility. Its strengths lie in predictive visualization, threat intelligence, and auto-remediation, making it a valuable tool for risk mitigation and compliance management. The platform's integration and responsiveness enhance cloud security, ensuring alignment with industry standards and effective threat protection.
What are the key features of Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP?Organizations in finance, healthcare, and retail frequently implement Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP for compliance and security across cloud environments. It assists with workload protection, threat detection, and regulatory obligation fulfillment, proving effective for securing applications and monitoring API interactions.
Managed in the cloud and powered by Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability Management (formerly Tenable.io) provides the industry's most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your organization. Built-in prioritization, threat intelligence and real-time insight help you understand your exposures and proactively prioritize remediations.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.