Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and ExtraHop Networks are both solutions in the Container Security category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.5, while ExtraHop Networks is ranked #30 with an average rating of 9.0. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 1.9% mindshare in Container Security, compared to ExtraHop Networks’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ExtraHop Networks users who would recommend it.

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP

Read 73 Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP reviews

6,163 Views
3,513 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Read 3 ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 reviews

979 Views
186 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP and ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 are leading cloud security solutions. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 has an edge for its comprehensive insights and superior real-time analytics.

Features: Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP includes robust threat prevention, integrated compliance tools, and a straightforward interface. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 offers advanced detection capabilities, real-time analytics, and in-depth visibility, making it superior in detection.

Room For Improvement: Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP needs better automation, simpler configuration, and usability enhancements. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 requires improved third-party tool integration, enhanced alert systems, and better integration capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is noted for its easy deployment and reliable customer service. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 offers easy deployment but stands out with more responsive customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP users find it cost-effective with a good ROI. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360, despite higher upfront costs, is valued for its significant return on investment through enhanced security outcomes.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP

Ranking in Container Security

10th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (10th), Cloud and Data Center Security (8th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (6th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (5th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (5th), Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) (6th), Compliance Management (6th)

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Ranking in Container Security

30th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) (19th), Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (9th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (23rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Container Security category, the mindshare of Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is 1.9%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Security Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP	1.9%
ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360	0.3%
Other	97.8%

Container Security

Featured Reviews

Bart Coddens

Cloud Engineer at Cloudar

Evolved cloud security with active monitoring but needs interface consistency

The user interface needs work. Sometimes, it is a transition from the old tool to the new CNAPP Two that I currently have, and remnants of the old environment can still be detected. I require consistency in the user interface to ensure everything is streamlined into the same look and feel. More work is needed in fine-tuning the threat data towards your CSPM and activity logs, aligning them with business intelligence, which requires a cohesive console interface. My assessment of CloudGuard CDRs in intrusion detection and threat hunting capabilities is that it still needs some work. All the threat data that comes in, you need to fine tune it a bit.

Read full review

Maksym Toporkov

Head of Research And Development at Quipu GmbH

A competitive choice for network detection and response with exceptional user interface, ease of implementation and minimal false positives

The NDR feature analyzes network traffic, creating records with connection details. While these records offer insights, there's a limitation in investigating payloads directly. ExtraHop provides an option for an additional server to save payloads, but its temporary storage has constraints. Unlike some competitors, it lacks an automatic payload-saving feature for each detection, presenting an improvement opportunity. Suggested enhancement involves the main sensor prompting payload storage for specific detections, streamlining the investigation process, and contributing to a more efficient workflow. A drawback includes packet storage limitations for payload data, necessitating timely extraction for thorough investigations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Overall, it provides good security."

"The reporting against compliance is an important feature that helps you comply with policies and standards within your organization."

"The comprehensive security for IaaS and PaaS cloud assets provides efficient security awareness to all the teams."

"The reporting is quite good. It is the most powerful aspect of this solution."

"It learns from behavior, attacks, management, detections, captures packets, real-time analysis, et cetera. It's generating knowledge from a variety of sources for an excellent analysis."

"This platform has allowed us to collect data from multiple sources, centralizing everything under a single source."

"Customer service is very good."

"The most valuable features are the ability to create pipeline rules, the enhanced NetOps security, and the deep visibility across our entire infrastructure."

More Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP pros

"It stands out for its intuitive and efficient user interface, robust detection capabilities with minimal false positives, and the ability to handle encrypted traffic, making it a valuable asset for network security and management."

"It is very easy to collect and handle data in ExtraHop Reveal(X) Cloud. Integration with Big Data is also easy. Many of our customers integrate it with Big Data platforms like Splunk or Elastic. It is also easy to handle and easy to understand."

"It is scalable."

Cons

"There are opportunities for improvement that can be addressed through a roadmap."

"The entire system is complicated, and the setup process may not cater to the company's demands."

"The reporting dashboard responds slowly, which leads to late report compilation."

"The support must be more effective."

"The support it provides is not very good. They should improve it since we have had several setbacks due to support issues."

"The security of Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management could improve. There are always new security issues coming out."

"Sometimes, the solution provides us with false alerts of vulnerabilities that are not present in our cloud environment."

"The solution could be improved with a greater analysis of its Microsoft Security score."

More Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP cons

"There needs to be more support."

"A drawback includes bucket storage limitations for payload data, necessitating timely extraction for thorough investigations."

"They can include integration with SAP. Currently, no vendor provides network performance monitoring in the SAP market. It is a very big market. We have around 400 customers for SAP in Korea. In the USA, there are more than 10,000 customers."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Everything in this field is very expensive."

"Licensing and costs are straightforward, as they have a baseline of 100 workloads within one license and no additional charges."

"Right now, we have licenses on 500 machines, and they are not cheap."

"Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management is expensive."

"The license fee is high."

"We have the enterprise-level license and we renew it annually because it is worth the cost."

"The license for CloudGuard Posture Management is about $80 a year, and it's based on your cloud footprint, not the number of users. So you could have a million users, and it doesn't matter."

"I would advise taking into account the existing number of devices and add a forecast of the number of devices to be added in the coming year or two, to obtain better pricing."

More Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP pricing and cost advice

"When compared to other solutions, it aligns with the market average, indicating a competitive pricing level."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

Government

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	54
Midsize Enterprise	17
Large Enterprise	57

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard Workload Protection?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the pricing model is flexible and consumption-based, which makes it easier to align with our cloud. The setup cost was moderate, not to...

See all answers

What do you like most about CloudGuard for Cloud Intelligence?

The new scanning function is a valuable feature that wasn't available until recently.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Cloud Intelligence?

There is a lack of functionalities and usability. I used to compare it with another solution that is focused on specific features. All solutions have some gaps, and we are looking for the best one ...

See all answers

What do you like most about ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360?

It stands out for its intuitive and efficient user interface, robust detection capabilities with minimal false positives, and the ability to handle encrypted traffic, making it a valuable asset for...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360?

I recommend prioritizing demos over POCs when engaging with vendors. Organizing POCs involves significant time and resource investments for both parties. Instead, invest time in multiple demo sessi...

See all answers

Comparisons

Wiz vs Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP

Compared 15% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP

Compared 13% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security vs Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP

Compared 7% of the time

Cloudflare vs Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP

Compared 4% of the time

More Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP Competitors

ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 19% of the time

Wiz vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 15% of the time

Corelight vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 13% of the time

Darktrace vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 12% of the time

Stellar Cyber Open XDR vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 12% of the time

More ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP

October 2025

Download Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP product report

Buyer's Guide

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

October 2025

Download ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 product report

Also Known As

Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management, Dome9, Check Point CloudGuard Workload Protection, Check Point CloudGuard Intelligence

ExtraHop Reveal(X) Cloud, Reveal(X) Cloud

Overview

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP offers comprehensive cloud security with features like dynamic access control, asset protection, and compliance checks, tailored for organizations seeking enhanced governance across AWS, Azure, and GCP platforms.

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP provides robust capabilities, including centralized firewall management, IAM scanning, and real-time visibility. Its strengths lie in predictive visualization, threat intelligence, and auto-remediation, making it a valuable tool for risk mitigation and compliance management. The platform's integration and responsiveness enhance cloud security, ensuring alignment with industry standards and effective threat protection.

What are the key features of Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP?

Dynamic Access Control: Enables granular security permissions for cloud resources.
Asset Protection: Safeguards cloud assets from unauthorized access and threats.
Compliance Checks: Ensures alignment with industry regulations like PCI DSS and SOC 2.
Centralized Firewall Management: Simplifies firewall rule configuration across cloud environments.
IAM Scanning: Audits and secures identity and access management configurations.
Real-Time Visibility: Provides insights into cloud environments for proactive threat detection.

What benefits and ROI should you expect from Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP?

Threat Intelligence: Identifies and mitigates potential risks before exploitation.
Auto-Remediation: Automates responses to security incidents, reducing manual intervention.
Intuitive Interface: Simplifies management and enhances operational efficiency.
Posture Management: Maintains strong security posture through continuous assessment.

Organizations in finance, healthcare, and retail frequently implement Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP for compliance and security across cloud environments. It assists with workload protection, threat detection, and regulatory obligation fulfillment, proving effective for securing applications and monitoring API interactions.

Check Point Software Technologies

Cloud is where your business operates, where it innovates, how it enables employees, and how it connects with customers. Adversaries know this, and that's why attacks against cloud assets in IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS environments are increasing. With Reveal(x) 360, you can mitigate the blast radius of advanced threats like ransomware and supply chain attacks with unified security across multicloud and hybrid environments in a single management pane.

ExtraHop Networks

Sample Customers

Symantec, Citrix, Car and Driver, Virgin, Cloud Technology Partners

Wizards of the Coast

Buyer's Guide

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

September 2025

Free Report: Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 report.

See our list of best Container Security vendors.

We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.