Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs CoreOS Clair comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and Red Hat are both solutions in the Container Security category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.5, while Red Hat is ranked #28 with an average rating of 9.0. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 1.9% mindshare in Container Security, compared to Red Hat’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP

Read 73 Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP reviews

6,163 Views
3,513 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

CoreOS Clair

Read 2 CoreOS Clair reviews

513 Views
508 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP

CoreOS Clair

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP and CoreOS Clair compete in cloud-native security. Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP leads in pricing and customer support, while CoreOS Clair is favored for its features despite a higher price.

Features: Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP has advanced threat detection, automated policy enforcement, and user-friendly pricing structures. CoreOS Clair offers robust vulnerability scanning, detailed reporting capabilities, and comprehensive feature depth.

Room for Improvement: Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP needs better integration with other cloud platforms, enhanced scalability, and improved user documentation. CoreOS Clair should focus on enhancing scalability, improving documentation, and refining user interface for easier navigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is straightforward to deploy and has responsive customer support. CoreOS Clair has a steeper learning curve during deployment but offers effective customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is found to be affordable with good ROI. CoreOS Clair is more expensive initially, though users find the comprehensive feature set justifies the cost and delivers strong ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. CoreOS Clair Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. CoreOS Clair

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP

Ranking in Container Security

10th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (10th), Cloud and Data Center Security (8th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (6th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (5th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (5th), Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) (6th), Compliance Management (6th)

CoreOS Clair

Ranking in Container Security

28th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Container Security category, the mindshare of Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is 1.9%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CoreOS Clair is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Security Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP	1.9%
CoreOS Clair	0.6%
Other	97.5%

Container Security

Featured Reviews

Bart Coddens

Cloud Engineer at Cloudar

Evolved cloud security with active monitoring but needs interface consistency

The user interface needs work. Sometimes, it is a transition from the old tool to the new CNAPP Two that I currently have, and remnants of the old environment can still be detected. I require consistency in the user interface to ensure everything is streamlined into the same look and feel. More work is needed in fine-tuning the threat data towards your CSPM and activity logs, aligning them with business intelligence, which requires a cohesive console interface. My assessment of CloudGuard CDRs in intrusion detection and threat hunting capabilities is that it still needs some work. All the threat data that comes in, you need to fine tune it a bit.

Read full review

Felipe Giffu

Red Hat Solution Architect at Seprol Computadores e Sistemas

An operational system, similar to Linux where you can run your applications inside containers

With CoreOS, you can run your applications inside containers. For example, if you have an application that needs to run on Linux, you can create and install a container. However, it's important to note that you don't install CoreOS inside a container; CoreOS is the host operating system that manages containers. When you mentioned using Nacula as part of your CI/CD pipeline, it means your application is deployed and managed automatically through the CI/CD process. Containers are used to deploy your application within this pipeline, but CoreOS does not run inside these containers. Instead, CoreOS is the base operating system that supports and manages these containers.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Good interface and visibility."

"Assets Management as it provide complete visibility of our workload inkling EC2 instance or Serverless"

"The CDR helps detect anomalous behavior and respond to threats before they become an issue."

"It offers a range of features tailored to address the unique security challenges."

"Cloud security posture management is the feature we've been using the longest."

"We like the ability to investigate, analyze, and generate reports."

"The most valuable feature is posture management, which gives you complete visibility of all your assets in the cloud and allows you to do governance and compliance."

"The administration portal panel is very intuitive."

More Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP pros

"With CoreOS, you can run your applications inside containers. For example, if you have an application that needs to run on Linux, you can create and install a container. However, it's important to note that you don't install CoreOS inside a container; CoreOS is the host operating system that manages containers."

"CoreOS Clair's best feature is detection accuracy."

Cons

"Especially with cloud security, there's too much clutter on the screen and too many things going on."

"CloudGuard CNAPP could be enhanced by increasing the number of components that run natively on Azure."

"For businesses with varied IT ecosystems, increasing the integration capabilities with additional third-party products and services would increase flexibility and user-friendliness."

"CloudGuard's reporting could be better. It's good now, but there is room for improvement. If you're looking for a centralized platform, there are a lot of features that can be appreciated. However, you want complete security integration with SaaS, DAST, secret scanning, etc., and a single platform for all these features."

"The biggest thing is the documentation aspect of Dome9 is a little lacking. They were purchased by Check Point about a year and a half to two years ago. When they integrated into Check Point's support system, a lot of the documentation that they had previously got mangled in the transition, e.g., linking to stuff on the Dome9 website that no longer exists. There are still a lot of spaces with incomplete links and stuff that is not as fully explained as it could be."

"The rules are not well-tuned, and many of them generate false positives or nonsensical results."

"Automatic remediation requires read/write access. When providing read/write access to third-party applications, this can add risk. It should have some options of triggering API calls to the cloud platform, which in turn, can make the required changes."

"Check Point tools need to improve the latency in the portal since they take a long time to load."

More Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP cons

"It can be improved in its support response. They usually take up to seven days to resolve the issue."

"An area for improvement is that CoreOS Clair doesn't provide information about the location of vulnerabilities it detects."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management is expensive."

"Licensing and costs are straightforward, as they have a baseline of 100 workloads within one license and no additional charges."

"It is difficult to contextualize the pricing because we are used to Indian pricing and licensing."

"Its price is very fair."

"The solution’s pricing is a little bit high."

"The pricing is extremely competitive."

"Everything in this field is very expensive."

"The tool's pricing is moderate. Its licensing costs are yearly."

More Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP pricing and cost advice

"CoreOS Clair is open-source and free of charge."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	54
Midsize Enterprise	17
Large Enterprise	57

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard Workload Protection?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the pricing model is flexible and consumption-based, which makes it easier to align with our cloud. The setup cost was moderate, not to...

See all answers

What do you like most about CloudGuard for Cloud Intelligence?

The new scanning function is a valuable feature that wasn't available until recently.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Cloud Intelligence?

There is a lack of functionalities and usability. I used to compare it with another solution that is focused on specific features. All solutions have some gaps, and we are looking for the best one ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CoreOS Clair?

If you work with CoreOS or OpenShift, you don't need to pay for CoreOS separately. When you pay for OpenShift, you get CoreOS included, so you don't need to pay for the operating system separately....

See all answers

What needs improvement with CoreOS Clair?

It can be improved in its support response. They usually take up to seven days to resolve the issue.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CoreOS Clair?

We use the tool to manage and secure the event file system. CoreOS Clair is an operational system that is very similar to Linux and offers benefits to other Linux operating systems. One major advan...

See all answers

Comparisons

Wiz vs Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP

Compared 15% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP

Compared 13% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security vs Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP

Compared 7% of the time

Cloudflare vs Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP

Compared 4% of the time

More Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP Competitors

JFrog Xray vs CoreOS Clair

Compared 23% of the time

Trivy vs CoreOS Clair

Compared 17% of the time

Snyk vs CoreOS Clair

Compared 15% of the time

Tenable.io Container Security vs CoreOS Clair

Compared 13% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs CoreOS Clair

Compared 12% of the time

More CoreOS Clair Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP

October 2025

Download Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP product report

Buyer's Guide

Container Security

October 2025

Download CoreOS Clair product report

Also Known As

Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management, Dome9, Check Point CloudGuard Workload Protection, Check Point CloudGuard Intelligence

No data available

Overview

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP offers comprehensive cloud security with features like dynamic access control, asset protection, and compliance checks, tailored for organizations seeking enhanced governance across AWS, Azure, and GCP platforms.

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP provides robust capabilities, including centralized firewall management, IAM scanning, and real-time visibility. Its strengths lie in predictive visualization, threat intelligence, and auto-remediation, making it a valuable tool for risk mitigation and compliance management. The platform's integration and responsiveness enhance cloud security, ensuring alignment with industry standards and effective threat protection.

What are the key features of Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP?

Dynamic Access Control: Enables granular security permissions for cloud resources.
Asset Protection: Safeguards cloud assets from unauthorized access and threats.
Compliance Checks: Ensures alignment with industry regulations like PCI DSS and SOC 2.
Centralized Firewall Management: Simplifies firewall rule configuration across cloud environments.
IAM Scanning: Audits and secures identity and access management configurations.
Real-Time Visibility: Provides insights into cloud environments for proactive threat detection.

What benefits and ROI should you expect from Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP?

Threat Intelligence: Identifies and mitigates potential risks before exploitation.
Auto-Remediation: Automates responses to security incidents, reducing manual intervention.
Intuitive Interface: Simplifies management and enhances operational efficiency.
Posture Management: Maintains strong security posture through continuous assessment.

Organizations in finance, healthcare, and retail frequently implement Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP for compliance and security across cloud environments. It assists with workload protection, threat detection, and regulatory obligation fulfillment, proving effective for securing applications and monitoring API interactions.

Check Point Software Technologies

Clair is an open source project for the static analysis of vulnerabilities in appc and docker containers.

Vulnerability data is continuously imported from a known set of sources and correlated with the indexed contents of container images in order to produce lists of vulnerabilities that threaten a container. When vulnerability data changes upstream, the previous state and new state of the vulnerability along with the images they affect can be sent via webhook to a configured endpoint. All major components can be customized programmatically at compile-time without forking the project.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

Symantec, Citrix, Car and Driver, Virgin, Cloud Technology Partners

eBay, Veritas, Verizon, SalesForce

Buyer's Guide

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. CoreOS Clair

September 2025

Free Report: Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. CoreOS Clair

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. CoreOS Clair and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. CoreOS Clair report.

See our list of best Container Security vendors.

We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.