Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ChatGPT vs GitHub CoPilot comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 5, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ChatGPT
Ranking in AI Code Assistants
6th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
AI Writing Tools (4th), Large Language Models (LLMs) (4th), AI Proofreading Tools (3rd)
GitHub CoPilot
Ranking in AI Code Assistants
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
Rapid Application Development Software (10th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the AI Code Assistants category, the mindshare of ChatGPT is 2.9%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub CoPilot is 7.0%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AI Code Assistants
 

Featured Reviews

Malte Landwehr - PeerSpot reviewer
Using technology helps streamline research, improve writing skills, and brainstorm creative ideas
I don't have one use case. I have many. I use ChatGPT for creativity and brainstorming. I often use it to generate ten or twenty ideas for a topic, and that often helps me to then pick which direction I actually want to go into. I use it to fine-tune my writing skills. When I write an important…
TarunRevalla - PeerSpot reviewer
Saves time with context-aware code suggestions and seamless integration
In terms of improvements for Copilot, I haven't considered much since it offers many useful interactions. It integrates well with GitHub repositories, tracks changes on PRs, and provides valuable suggestions where applicable. There is excellent support across various code editors like JetBrains, VS Code, and NeoGen. I also run many automations within GitHub. When an NPR is raised, it automatically provides suggestions, which is part of the enterprise edition without limitations. While I don't see immediate room for improvement, one suggestion is for Copilot to provide specific suggestions for certain lines of code instead of rewriting entire sections. If the tool could focus on specific lines where changes are suggested, it would save time and reduce server load.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Rockset is very fast, and you can query just like in MySQL."
"The initial setup was very simple."
"ChatGPT has positively impacted our organization by speeding up a lot of our processing time."
"I would rate ChatGPT a nine on a scale of one to ten."
"It enhances efficiency and productivity in development."
"I use it almost like a search engine, but it goes a step beyond."
"The product's most valuable feature is vulnerability management features."
"The solution's most valuable features are context awareness, multi language support, integration with popular IDs like Visual Studio Code or JetBrains, and reduced coding time."
"GitHub CoPilot has good stability and performance."
"Copilot is highly recommended for everyone."
"Efficiencies with GitHub CoPilot have improved by 30%, which means a quicker go-to market and a simplified way of documenting technical designs."
"GitHub CoPilot is easy to use even for beginners and it supports the integration with CI/CD tools."
 

Cons

"Rockset is now bought by OpenAI. It’s uncertain if Rockset will continue to exist as it is."
"I would not recommend ChatGPT as a standalone product. I think it could be beneficial when used alongside other tools, but as a standalone solution, its accuracy cannot be entirely trusted."
"Filtering the database based on indexes is difficult in Rockset and should be simplified."
"If the tool could focus on specific lines where changes are suggested, it would save time and reduce server load."
"Sometimes, if it is a bigger piece of code, it breaks in between."
"It cannot be fully depended on to build every component and run a large enterprise application without significant human intervention."
"The only suggestion is to enhance Copilot's ability to assist developers with infrastructure as code tasks. Like, while using CI/CD pipeline, when I use YAML files, so it could just support the port number."
"The limitation is based on the training dataset and the number of repositories."
"One drawback is that the solution sometimes suggests unwanted code, especially if I accidentally press the tab. This doesn't happen often. Sometimes it seems to understand my code, but other times it doesn't. This inconsistency is confusing."
"GitHub CoPilot's alerting features need improvement."
"In certain instances, OpenAI didn't respond in the expected way. The responses were more general and didn't address the specific point."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"GitHub Copilot is a paid service, costing approximately $6 per month. There might be a free trial available."
"GitHub CoPilot comes readily available for enterprise customers, so it's a free add-on if you already have GitHub's enterprise license."
"The product offers a free version and a paid version. Whether to choose the product's free version or paid version depends on the size of the company where it will be used."
"The solution is costly."
"There is a need to pay around 10 USD to be able to use the solution."
"A personal license is priced at ten dollars per month, while a professional or enterprise license costs nineteen dollars per user, and these rates are consistent for all users."
"The product has a tiered pricing model that starts with a free version for individual developers but requires a separate license fee for enterprise use."
"It's affordable."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Code Assistants solutions are best for your needs.
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
10%
Healthcare Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with ChatGPT?
I think it's pretty good. No recommendations.
What is your primary use case for ChatGPT?
I don't have one use case. I have many. I use ChatGPT for creativity and brainstorming. I often use it to generate ten or twenty ideas for a topic, and that often helps me to then pick which direct...
What advice do you have for others considering ChatGPT?
Just use it. Just don't be afraid to use it. Just go with it. I would rate ChatGPT a nine on a scale of one to ten. It's really, really good.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub CoPilot?
I honestly don't have a clue about how much we usually pay for GitHub CoPilot because the increase in license costs is managed by another team, and I am not the administrator, so I generally don't ...
What needs improvement with GitHub CoPilot?
The areas of GitHub CoPilot that need improvement include the ability to debug, which is applicable to AI-driven tools that allow you to code, and to understand our application better and learn fro...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Rockset
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. Adobe 2. Cisco 3. Comcast 4. DoorDash 5. Expedia 6. Facebook 7. GitHub 8. IBM 9. Lyft 10. Microsoft 11. Netflix 12. Oracle 13. Pinterest 14. Reddit 15. Salesforce 16. Slack 17. Spotify 18. Square 19. Target 20. Twitter 21. Uber 22. Verizon 23. Visa 24. Walmart 25. Yelp 26. Zoom 27. Airbnb 28. Dropbox 29. eBay 30. Google 31. LinkedIn 32. Amazon
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about ChatGPT vs. GitHub CoPilot and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.