Carbonite Server vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication comparison

Why PeerSpot?

OpenText and Nakivo are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. OpenText is ranked #57, while Nakivo is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.8. OpenText holds a 0.9% mindshare in BRS, compared to Nakivo’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 99% of Nakivo users who would recommend it.

Carbonite Server

Read 7 Carbonite Server reviews

4,387 Views
2,939 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Read 94 NAKIVO Backup & Replication reviews

7,923 Views
6,497 Comparison Views

99% willing to recommend

Carbonite Server

NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 8, 2026

NAKIVO Backup & Replication and Carbonite Server compete in the backup and recovery space. While NAKIVO often receives positive feedback for its pricing model, Carbonite Server is noted for its comprehensive feature set, justifying its higher price for some users.

Features: NAKIVO Backup & Replication includes efficient data backup, advanced VM replication, and cloud platform integration. Carbonite Server distinguishes itself with robust disaster recovery, strong data encryption, and reliability across both physical and virtual environments.

Room for Improvement: NAKIVO could enhance its support for larger environments and improve integration with physical servers. It may also benefit from boosting data transfer speeds. Carbonite Server might focus on streamlining its deployment process, offering more flexible licensing options, and simplifying its user interface to enhance usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NAKIVO has a simple and quick deployment process requiring minimal IT resources, with responsive customer service. Carbonite Server, while complex to deploy due to its extensive features, provides comprehensive support to ensure smooth implementation.

Pricing and ROI: NAKIVO Backup & Replication is known for a lower setup cost, providing rapid ROI, especially suitable for small to mid-sized enterprises. Carbonite Server involves a higher initial investment, perceived as delivering substantial ROI through its advanced and robust backup solutions for enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed Carbonite Server vs. NAKIVO Backup & Replication Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Carbonite Server vs. NAKIVO Backup & Replication

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Carbonite Server

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

57th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (42nd)

NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

12th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Carbonite Server is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NAKIVO Backup & Replication is 1.1%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
NAKIVO Backup & Replication	1.1%
Carbonite Server	0.9%
Other	98.0%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Chris Puddy

Backup, storage and disaster recovery technical specialist at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

A reliable backup product which needs little management

For most technical users the setup and initial deployment are fairly straightforward and once deployed it 99% of the time looks after itself. Installation of the agents is similar to most other products in that it has an install wizard to guide you, the accompanying documentation is also very useful to assist wherever you are in the agent install and policy setup process. Normally our customers' IT team does the deployment of agents, however, this isn't a daunting task unless you are dealing with multiple servers to protect the product. On a server-by-server basis, the deployment doesn't take long. From the MSP side of things, the infrastructure sitting behind the scenes doesn't take too much to install, configure and maintain.

Read full review

EDERLEY TERRERO

Business Consulting at Gestion IT

Robust data protection has safeguarded mailboxes and disaster recovery for our clients

NAKIVO Backup & Replication has released many updates lately and at this point it works excellently. Needs will always appear, particularly around the AI topic and other things that come out over time. I understand that solutions always have to keep moving forward, but so far I see it as excellent.I give it a nine because nothing is perfect. There are always solutions, and NAKIVO Backup & Replication is a tool that adapts perfectly to certain needs. However, we cannot dismiss that there are powerful solutions on the market that have been around for much longer. I rate it a nine because we can always improve.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Easy verification of things is the most valuable feature."

"The solution is very stable."

"It does not slow down your computer or use a lot of resources as it works."

"The Granular Restore of SQL feature has been a lifesaver more times than I can count. One of the main reasons for looking at Carbonite was their support for platforms like AIX and AS/400 Series."

"I find the BMR/image and the recovery pieces are valuable."

"Technical support handled all our issues quickly and effectively."

"It seems reliable and easy to use."

"The efficiency and convenience are excellent."

More Carbonite Server pros

"Nakivo is an easy-to-use, robust and cost-effective backup solution. I highly recommend it."

"Nakivo has improved our organization largely due to the fact that it is an extremely robust backup system and comes with a replication module that allows us to safeguard mission-critical servers, applied on several sites by us with fantastic results as it becomes a great Plan B in case of a hardware failure or an outage of a primary system."

"It is easy to set up using the included virtual appliance and also includes agents for most NAS systems."

"It uses all the bandwidth available if not limited and backs up entire servers with all data about four times faster than Windows Server Backup and EaseUS TODO Backup."

"The initial setup is very straightforward, and I love the Linux version as well; also, NAKIVO is scalable and stable."

"The enterprise version is a solid product with good support, a lot of features, and a helpful knowledge base."

"It was also very easy to configure backups to be sent offsite to a separate repository for disaster recovery needs."

"There are many license types and levels so that every customer can find the right balance between cost and features."

More NAKIVO Backup & Replication pros

Cons

"The support for object storage isn't quite there yet. Its public cloud support can be improved. I would love to see the public cloud support for object storage, and it would be great, but what I always hear from the folks at Carbonite is that in a lot of cases, it directly competes with their cloud offering. So, I don't know when or where that will go or if that will go anywhere, but we are hopeful to see something. The dashboard is a little outdated. If they gave it a facelift and put some better design around their dashboard, that would be tremendous. I generally care less about the visual aesthetics of an application as long as it does what it needed to do, which is true in the case of this solution. We also have the Microsoft 365 platform. Because they're two separate platforms, I have to log in to my Microsoft platform to manage it, and I have to log into my Carbonite server backup platform to manage it. Having these two coexist together in one management console is really what we're looking for, but we went for it knowing this. We also knew that there would be some integration coming down the road. So, we're again hoping to see some of that coming in 2021."

"When you have to restore it, Carbonite takes a lot of time."

"They do not yet have USB recovery but they are adding it in coming releases."

"The only thing that I would like to see improved is related to marketing. Currently, it is very difficult to find the right paper and stuff for me. Their marketing department should provide better information because currently, it is very difficult to find information on the internet. It was bought over by OpenText, and you won't be able to find a lot of information about this solution on their site. They should also provide training facilities for commercial purposes. Some of my colleagues recently went for pilot training, and they were technical. If I want to get trained, the training has to be more commercial. Currently, there is no such training for users like me."

"In the next release I would like to see an improvement in the auto failover option."

"The stability has room for improvement."

"It could be a little bit easier or faster to be able to access data files without having to download anything."

"The Hyper-V backup has room for improvement."

More Carbonite Server cons

"While Nakivo delivers comprehensive solutions, there's room for enhancement, particularly regarding Proxmox support."

"The upgrade process is a bit dated and could use some changes."

"More statistic options would be a great feature."

"The software is aimed at backing up VM images but it would be nice to have an option to just backup certain files/folders and not the entire disk."

"Sometimes, for some VMs and some Windows Server versions, specifically old versions (aka server 12 or older) fail due to the VSS writer error or locking file system."

"In the next release, I would like for them to add restore in physical machines."

"The way encryption is currently working could be improved. Currently, it's not possible to encrypt the backup to an NFS share directly. It needs to have the encryption within the Transporter/VM to enable encryption, which isn't optimal. So I'm hoping that in the near future this function will be implemented."

"It would be ideal if they offered a support portal for users."

More NAKIVO Backup & Replication cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is open source."

"The pricing is between $120 and $150 per year."

"We pay 9,000 dollars per year for our license."

"Its price is reasonable."

"Nakivo has a good price-performance ratio."

"This product is cheaper than other big rivals."

"It has a very good price in the market."

"Cost is very appropriate for SMEs."

"I think the price is competitive. However, for some projects, it can be a bit much for price-sensitive small businesses."

"The licensing model is very affordable compared to competitors, with a good quality-to-cost ratio, and the software is quite simple and fast to setup."

"The prices are high."

"As a free solution for a small environment, this is a great solution!"

More NAKIVO Backup & Replication pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

12%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	81
Midsize Enterprise	16
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Nakivo compare with Veeam Backup & Replication?

Nakivo is my favorite backup software. Below are the main benefits of Nakivo compared to Veeam 1. Low cost. 2. Backup storage with global deduplication (this is the main requirement of a backup sol...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nakivo?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing shows that NAKIVO Backup & Replication is more price-efficient than other solutions, and we are satisfied with the pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nakivo?

Improving NAKIVO Backup & Replication involves addressing the hassle of choosing the right license level when starting out, especially with specific requirements, and the lack of macOS support ...

See all answers

Comparisons

HPE Zerto Software vs Carbonite Server

Compared 5% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Carbonite Server

Compared 5% of the time

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs Carbonite Server

Compared 4% of the time

SugarSync vs Carbonite Server

Compared 4% of the time

Carbonite Safe Backup vs Carbonite Server

Compared 3% of the time

More Carbonite Server Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 10% of the time

Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 5% of the time

Rubrik vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 3% of the time

BDRShield vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 3% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 3% of the time

More NAKIVO Backup & Replication Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Backup

September 2026

Download Carbonite Server product report

Buyer's Guide

NAKIVO Backup & Replication

September 2026

Download NAKIVO Backup & Replication product report

Also Known As

Carbonite Recover Backup

No data available

Overview

Carbonite Server offers robust disaster recovery and data protection, with efficient features for restoring and managing complex server environments.

With capabilities like Bare Metal Recovery and SQL granular restore, Carbonite Server supports AIX and AS/400 Series, making it versatile for different platforms. Its efficient replication and failover processes are particularly beneficial for maintaining business continuity. Users appreciate the straightforward setup, responsive technical support, and automatic updates. There is room for improvement in areas such as instant recovery, more granular user permissions, and enhanced cloud integration. Managed service providers find it useful for offering reliable cloud and on-premises backup solutions.

What are the key features of Carbonite Server?

Bare Metal Recovery: Simplifies full system recovery with minimal user intervention.
SQL Granular Restore: Enhances precision in database recovery operations.
Platform Support: Compatible with AIX, AS/400, VMware, vSphere, and vSAN.
Efficient Replication: Facilitates swift disaster recovery and data transfer.
Automatic Updates: Ensures current software status with less manual effort.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Disaster Recovery: Quick recovery processes improve business resilience.
Easy Verification: Simplifies compliance and data integrity checks.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes system resource usage, enhancing performance.
Reliable Support: Access to responsive technical support mitigates downtime.
Data Protection: Comprehensive solutions for cloud backups and data security.

Industries leveraging Carbonite Server enjoy its ability to support cloud backups, off-site data protection, and complex server restoration, especially in virtualized environments. It is widely used by managed service providers to deliver backup services and ensure application consistency in data transfers.

OpenText

NAKIVO Backup & Replication delivers rapid deployment and intuitive management across environments like Windows, Linux, and NAS. It is known for fast VM recovery, robust data protection, and cloud integration with competitive pricing.

NAKIVO Backup & Replication supports diverse IT landscapes, offering efficient deduplication, offsite backups, and policy-based replication. Its granular file restores, effective compression, and seamless cloud integration make it a preferred choice for minimizing downtime and enhancing business resilience. Users highlight its security measures, flexible deployment options, and automatic backups as core strengths. However, further enhancements in interface refinement, storage array integrations, and broadened support for virtual technologies and physical machine backups could enhance user satisfaction. Users seek improved control over alerts, better reporting capabilities, and optimized deduplication and compression.

What are the key features of NAKIVO Backup & Replication?

Fast VM Recovery: Minimal downtime with quick restore options for virtual machines.
Deduplication & Compression: Efficient data storage through advanced deduplication techniques and compression.
Cloud Integration: Seamless operations with cloud platforms like AWS for flexible backup solutions.
Policy-Based Replication: Automated replication policies ensuring consistent and reliable data backup.
Granular File Restores: Restore specific files without needing full system recovery, saving time and resources.

What benefits should users look for when evaluating NAKIVO Backup & Replication?

Competitive Pricing: Cost-effective solution with robust features.
Ease of Use: Intuitive management for a hassle-free experience.
Reliable Performance: Consistent results in protecting and recovering data.
Strong Support: Responsive customer service catering to user needs.

In industries like technology and finance, NAKIVO Backup & Replication is essential for securing virtual environments such as VMware and Hyper-V. Its deployment on NAS devices and capability for offsite backups to cloud platforms like AWS are appreciated. Organizations utilize it for backup, replication, and recovery of virtual machines using daily and incremental methods, ensuring efficient data protection and disaster recovery processes.

Nakivo

Sample Customers

INLINE Commercial Construction, Hamilton County

Coca Cola, Honda, 3M, University of Arizona, University of Maryland, University of Arkansas, Johns Hopkins University, Marriott, Radisson Hotels and Resorts, Fujifilm, Eiffage

Buyer's Guide

Carbonite Server vs. NAKIVO Backup & Replication

September 2026

Free Report: Carbonite Server vs. NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Find out what your peers are saying about Carbonite Server vs. NAKIVO Backup & Replication and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Carbonite Server vs. NAKIVO Backup & Replication report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.