Carbonite Server vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication comparison

OpenText and Nakivo are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. OpenText is ranked #57, while Nakivo is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.8. OpenText holds a 0.9% mindshare in BRS, compared to Nakivo’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 99% of Nakivo users who would recommend it.

Carbonite Server

Read 7 Carbonite Server reviews

3,973 Views
2,702 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Read 94 NAKIVO Backup & Replication reviews

7,602 Views
6,234 Comparison Views

99% willing to recommend

Carbonite Server

NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 8, 2026

NAKIVO Backup & Replication and Carbonite Server compete in the backup and recovery space. While NAKIVO often receives positive feedback for its pricing model, Carbonite Server is noted for its comprehensive feature set, justifying its higher price for some users.

Features: NAKIVO Backup & Replication includes efficient data backup, advanced VM replication, and cloud platform integration. Carbonite Server distinguishes itself with robust disaster recovery, strong data encryption, and reliability across both physical and virtual environments.

Room for Improvement: NAKIVO could enhance its support for larger environments and improve integration with physical servers. It may also benefit from boosting data transfer speeds. Carbonite Server might focus on streamlining its deployment process, offering more flexible licensing options, and simplifying its user interface to enhance usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NAKIVO has a simple and quick deployment process requiring minimal IT resources, with responsive customer service. Carbonite Server, while complex to deploy due to its extensive features, provides comprehensive support to ensure smooth implementation.

Pricing and ROI: NAKIVO Backup & Replication is known for a lower setup cost, providing rapid ROI, especially suitable for small to mid-sized enterprises. Carbonite Server involves a higher initial investment, perceived as delivering substantial ROI through its advanced and robust backup solutions for enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed Carbonite Server vs. NAKIVO Backup & Replication Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Carbonite Server vs. NAKIVO Backup & Replication

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Carbonite Server

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

57th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (44th)

NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

13th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Carbonite Server is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NAKIVO Backup & Replication is 1.2%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
NAKIVO Backup & Replication	1.2%
Carbonite Server	0.9%
Other	97.9%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Chris Puddy

Backup, storage and disaster recovery technical specialist at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

A reliable backup product which needs little management

For most technical users the setup and initial deployment are fairly straightforward and once deployed it 99% of the time looks after itself. Installation of the agents is similar to most other products in that it has an install wizard to guide you, the accompanying documentation is also very useful to assist wherever you are in the agent install and policy setup process. Normally our customers' IT team does the deployment of agents, however, this isn't a daunting task unless you are dealing with multiple servers to protect the product. On a server-by-server basis, the deployment doesn't take long. From the MSP side of things, the infrastructure sitting behind the scenes doesn't take too much to install, configure and maintain.

Read full review

EDERLEY TERRERO

Business Consulting at Gestion IT

Robust data protection has safeguarded mailboxes and disaster recovery for our clients

NAKIVO Backup & Replication has released many updates lately and at this point it works excellently. Needs will always appear, particularly around the AI topic and other things that come out over time. I understand that solutions always have to keep moving forward, but so far I see it as excellent.I give it a nine because nothing is perfect. There are always solutions, and NAKIVO Backup & Replication is a tool that adapts perfectly to certain needs. However, we cannot dismiss that there are powerful solutions on the market that have been around for much longer. I rate it a nine because we can always improve.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution is very simple to use and I will recommend it to anybody."

"I find the BMR/image and the recovery pieces are valuable."

"Easy verification of things is the most valuable feature."

"It does not slow down your computer or use a lot of resources as it works."

"The advice that I have for people looking into using Carbonite Server is that it seems reliable and easy to use."

"The solution is very stable."

"The Granular Restore of SQL feature has been a lifesaver more times than I can count. One of the main reasons for looking at Carbonite was their support for platforms like AIX and AS/400 Series."

"Technical support handled all our issues quickly and effectively."

More Carbonite Server pros

"The ability to restore in the case of a catastrophic event is priceless since every company must use a backup solution of some sort."

"It has a much higher bang for the buck than other products we evaluated."

"You can have it setup and running within a few minutes."

"It's really cheap, and our company saves a significant amount of money on IT backup solutions per year."

"I appreciate the management that really does respond quickly, they reply immediately to any query raised from us as a technician or consultant and they know the pulse of the market and keep updating the features in such a big way."

"The user interface in general is very good. I"

"The VM Backup Verification is one of the features I appreciate the most."

"This product has helped to centralize backups and made it easy to recover data."

More NAKIVO Backup & Replication pros

Cons

"They do not yet have USB recovery but they are adding it in coming releases."

"In the next release I would like to see an improvement in the auto failover option."

"When you have to restore it, Carbonite takes a lot of time."

"The only thing that I would like to see improved is related to marketing. Currently, it is very difficult to find the right paper and stuff for me. Their marketing department should provide better information because currently, it is very difficult to find information on the internet. It was bought over by OpenText, and you won't be able to find a lot of information about this solution on their site. They should also provide training facilities for commercial purposes. Some of my colleagues recently went for pilot training, and they were technical. If I want to get trained, the training has to be more commercial. Currently, there is no such training for users like me."

"It could be a little bit easier or faster to be able to access data files without having to download anything."

"The Hyper-V backup has room for improvement."

"The support for object storage isn't quite there yet. Its public cloud support can be improved. I would love to see the public cloud support for object storage, and it would be great, but what I always hear from the folks at Carbonite is that in a lot of cases, it directly competes with their cloud offering. So, I don't know when or where that will go or if that will go anywhere, but we are hopeful to see something. The dashboard is a little outdated. If they gave it a facelift and put some better design around their dashboard, that would be tremendous. I generally care less about the visual aesthetics of an application as long as it does what it needed to do, which is true in the case of this solution. We also have the Microsoft 365 platform. Because they're two separate platforms, I have to log in to my Microsoft platform to manage it, and I have to log into my Carbonite server backup platform to manage it. Having these two coexist together in one management console is really what we're looking for, but we went for it knowing this. We also knew that there would be some integration coming down the road. So, we're again hoping to see some of that coming in 2021."

"The stability has room for improvement."

More Carbonite Server cons

"The only thing we have encountered that we would like to see improved in the future are error messages."

"The reporting features could be enhanced to provide more detailed and customizable reports for better insights into backup operations."

"I would like to have the option of creating a subfolder per job in the backup repository because we had an issue where some files were corrupted and we lost the backup of the majority of the VMs."

"It would be interesting if it were possible to integrate a mobile app to monitor the system in real-time."

"An improvement would be to include a general data backup solution that is not only for virtual machines."

"While the solution provides mostly what we need, it would be ideal if there were some additional feature capabilities for the API."

"Updating VM Tools on a replicated VM could be better."

"Sometimes, for some VMs and some Windows Server versions, specifically old versions (aka server 12 or older) fail due to the VSS writer error or locking file system."

More NAKIVO Backup & Replication cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is open source."

"We pay 9,000 dollars per year for our license."

"The pricing is between $120 and $150 per year."

"Its price is reasonable."

"Pricing is easy to understand and very affordable."

"The product is quite cheap compared to other products on the market, but despite this, it is rich in features both at the level of backup and recovery as well as at the level of additional options."

"You have a lot of different options when it comes to pricing and the pricing models are pretty flexible and affordable."

"The solution's pricing is adequate for its features and quality."

"From the perspective of Indian users, the cost is a little bit high."

"I advise that this is the best product for medium or small environments according to my cost-benefit analysis."

"This product is cheaper than other big rivals."

"It has a very good price in the market."

More NAKIVO Backup & Replication pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

11%

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	81
Midsize Enterprise	16
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Nakivo compare with Veeam Backup & Replication?

Nakivo is my favorite backup software. Below are the main benefits of Nakivo compared to Veeam 1. Low cost. 2. Backup storage with global deduplication (this is the main requirement of a backup sol...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nakivo?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing shows that NAKIVO Backup & Replication is more price-efficient than other solutions, and we are satisfied with the pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nakivo?

Improving NAKIVO Backup & Replication involves addressing the hassle of choosing the right license level when starting out, especially with specific requirements, and the lack of macOS support ...

See all answers

Comparisons

HPE Zerto Software vs Carbonite Server

Compared 5% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Carbonite Server

Compared 5% of the time

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs Carbonite Server

Compared 4% of the time

SugarSync vs Carbonite Server

Compared 4% of the time

Carbonite Safe Backup vs Carbonite Server

Compared 3% of the time

More Carbonite Server Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 9% of the time

Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 6% of the time

Rubrik vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 3% of the time

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 3% of the time

BDRShield vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 3% of the time

More NAKIVO Backup & Replication Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Backup

July 2026

Download Carbonite Server product report

Buyer's Guide

NAKIVO Backup & Replication

July 2026

Download NAKIVO Backup & Replication product report

Also Known As

Carbonite Recover Backup

No data available

Overview

Carbonite Server offers robust disaster recovery and data protection, with efficient features for restoring and managing complex server environments.

With capabilities like Bare Metal Recovery and SQL granular restore, Carbonite Server supports AIX and AS/400 Series, making it versatile for different platforms. Its efficient replication and failover processes are particularly beneficial for maintaining business continuity. Users appreciate the straightforward setup, responsive technical support, and automatic updates. There is room for improvement in areas such as instant recovery, more granular user permissions, and enhanced cloud integration. Managed service providers find it useful for offering reliable cloud and on-premises backup solutions.

What are the key features of Carbonite Server?

Bare Metal Recovery: Simplifies full system recovery with minimal user intervention.
SQL Granular Restore: Enhances precision in database recovery operations.
Platform Support: Compatible with AIX, AS/400, VMware, vSphere, and vSAN.
Efficient Replication: Facilitates swift disaster recovery and data transfer.
Automatic Updates: Ensures current software status with less manual effort.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Disaster Recovery: Quick recovery processes improve business resilience.
Easy Verification: Simplifies compliance and data integrity checks.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes system resource usage, enhancing performance.
Reliable Support: Access to responsive technical support mitigates downtime.
Data Protection: Comprehensive solutions for cloud backups and data security.

Industries leveraging Carbonite Server enjoy its ability to support cloud backups, off-site data protection, and complex server restoration, especially in virtualized environments. It is widely used by managed service providers to deliver backup services and ensure application consistency in data transfers.

OpenText

NAKIVO Backup & Replication delivers rapid deployment and intuitive management across environments like Windows, Linux, and NAS. It is known for fast VM recovery, robust data protection, and cloud integration with competitive pricing.

NAKIVO Backup & Replication supports diverse IT landscapes, offering efficient deduplication, offsite backups, and policy-based replication. Its granular file restores, effective compression, and seamless cloud integration make it a preferred choice for minimizing downtime and enhancing business resilience. Users highlight its security measures, flexible deployment options, and automatic backups as core strengths. However, further enhancements in interface refinement, storage array integrations, and broadened support for virtual technologies and physical machine backups could enhance user satisfaction. Users seek improved control over alerts, better reporting capabilities, and optimized deduplication and compression.

What are the key features of NAKIVO Backup & Replication?

Fast VM Recovery: Minimal downtime with quick restore options for virtual machines.
Deduplication & Compression: Efficient data storage through advanced deduplication techniques and compression.
Cloud Integration: Seamless operations with cloud platforms like AWS for flexible backup solutions.
Policy-Based Replication: Automated replication policies ensuring consistent and reliable data backup.
Granular File Restores: Restore specific files without needing full system recovery, saving time and resources.

What benefits should users look for when evaluating NAKIVO Backup & Replication?

Competitive Pricing: Cost-effective solution with robust features.
Ease of Use: Intuitive management for a hassle-free experience.
Reliable Performance: Consistent results in protecting and recovering data.
Strong Support: Responsive customer service catering to user needs.

In industries like technology and finance, NAKIVO Backup & Replication is essential for securing virtual environments such as VMware and Hyper-V. Its deployment on NAS devices and capability for offsite backups to cloud platforms like AWS are appreciated. Organizations utilize it for backup, replication, and recovery of virtual machines using daily and incremental methods, ensuring efficient data protection and disaster recovery processes.

Nakivo

Sample Customers

INLINE Commercial Construction, Hamilton County

Coca Cola, Honda, 3M, University of Arizona, University of Maryland, University of Arkansas, Johns Hopkins University, Marriott, Radisson Hotels and Resorts, Fujifilm, Eiffage

Buyer's Guide

Carbonite Server vs. NAKIVO Backup & Replication

August 2026

Free Report: Carbonite Server vs. NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Find out what your peers are saying about Carbonite Server vs. NAKIVO Backup & Replication and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Carbonite Server vs. NAKIVO Backup & Replication report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.