Carbonite Server vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication comparison

OpenText and Nakivo are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. OpenText is ranked #57, while Nakivo is ranked #6 with an average rating of 9.1. OpenText holds a 0.8% mindshare in BRS, compared to Nakivo’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 99% of Nakivo users who would recommend it.

Carbonite Server

Read 7 Carbonite Server reviews

1,779 Views
1,263 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Read 92 NAKIVO Backup & Replication reviews

3,832 Views
3,372 Comparison Views

99% willing to recommend

Carbonite Server

NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2025

NAKIVO Backup & Replication and Carbonite Server are in the data protection and backup solutions category. NAKIVO often has the upper hand in pricing and support, while Carbonite leads in features due to its more extensive functionality.

Features: NAKIVO Backup & Replication supports comprehensive VM backup capabilities, incremental replication, and cloud backup integration. Carbonite Server offers robust ransomware protection, high availability, and extensive server environment support. NAKIVO benefits organizations seeking VM-centric solutions, while Carbonite's broader feature set appeals to those with diversified data protection needs.

Room for Improvement: NAKIVO could enhance its server environment support, increase its range of features, and improve high availability capabilities. Carbonite could work on simplifying its deployment process, improving affordability, and streamlining customer support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NAKIVO benefits from a straightforward deployment model, facilitating quick setup with minimal complexity. Carbonite's complex deployment options might require longer implementation times, but it is supported by a dedicated service team. NAKIVO's simplicity suits smaller teams, while Carbonite supports intricate setups.

Pricing and ROI: NAKIVO's competitive pricing offers a high return on investment with limited additional resources needed. Carbonite's higher cost is justified by its expansive capabilities and enhanced resilience, making it a worthwhile investment for businesses seeking comprehensive protection strategies. NAKIVO is more suited for cost-sensitive environments, while Carbonite is targeted toward those prioritizing features and reliability.

To learn more, read our detailed Carbonite Server vs. NAKIVO Backup & Replication Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Carbonite Server vs. NAKIVO Backup & Replication

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Carbonite Server

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

57th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (46th)

NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

6th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Carbonite Server is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NAKIVO Backup & Replication is 1.1%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
NAKIVO Backup & Replication	1.1%
Carbonite Server	0.8%
Other	98.1%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Chris Puddy

Backup, storage and disaster recovery technical specialist at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

A reliable backup product which needs little management

For most technical users the setup and initial deployment are fairly straightforward and once deployed it 99% of the time looks after itself. Installation of the agents is similar to most other products in that it has an install wizard to guide you, the accompanying documentation is also very useful to assist wherever you are in the agent install and policy setup process. Normally our customers' IT team does the deployment of agents, however, this isn't a daunting task unless you are dealing with multiple servers to protect the product. On a server-by-server basis, the deployment doesn't take long. From the MSP side of things, the infrastructure sitting behind the scenes doesn't take too much to install, configure and maintain.

Read full review

Wisdom Selom Quarshie

System Engineer at NetSolutions Ghana Ltd

Has improved disaster recovery with seamless server replication and reduced operational costs

NAKIVO Backup & Replication has been useful; in terms of licensing, it is way cheaper than other solutions, and setting it up in terms of implementation was easier and not difficult to do. The user interface is friendly and straightforward to use. The best features NAKIVO Backup & Replication offers in my experience include the VMware replication jobs, which allow us to schedule the replication of servers at specific times and move them as quickly as possible. The Change Block Technology (CBT) aspect helps us check if data has really moved without even turning on the server, by just looking at the reports that have been sent, making it a beneficial feature. NAKIVO Backup & Replication has positively impacted our organization by providing much cheaper pricing compared to other solutions, which means we have saved more money, and integrating it with our solution, the VMware vSphere, is not challenging.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It seems reliable and easy to use."

"The solution is a free engine to help work with the container."

"The Granular Restore of SQL feature has been a lifesaver more times than I can count. One of the main reasons for looking at Carbonite was their support for platforms like AIX and AS/400 Series."

"I find the BMR/image and the recovery pieces are valuable."

"Technical support handled all our issues quickly and effectively."

"The efficiency and convenience are excellent."

"It does not slow down your computer or use a lot of resources as it works."

"Easy verification of things is the most valuable feature."

More Carbonite Server pros

"The speed of the backups and replications is fantastic and, for the most part, the simplicity of use has been wonderful."

"It is affordable."

"It is fast, simple, powerful, and has a price without competition."

"The main advantage from our perspective is the ability to plug this solution into an existing infrastructure on a cheap device and point the backup at the server targets and configure the backup options in a simple menu; linking to a cheap cloud resource for a simple solution for off-site storage."

"Before using Nakivo Backup & Replication, all our data backup processes took a long time and did not optimize the disk space reserved for backup. With the introduction of Nakivo Backup & Replication, saving times have been reduced by almost half (thanks to the use of several simultaneous transporters) and the space occupied has also had a very important reduction."

"You can have it setup and running within a few minutes."

"The back-up and restore functions work great and it's easy to use."

"Technical support responds very quickly."

More NAKIVO Backup & Replication pros

Cons

"The only thing that I would like to see improved is related to marketing. Currently, it is very difficult to find the right paper and stuff for me. Their marketing department should provide better information because currently, it is very difficult to find information on the internet. It was bought over by OpenText, and you won't be able to find a lot of information about this solution on their site. They should also provide training facilities for commercial purposes. Some of my colleagues recently went for pilot training, and they were technical. If I want to get trained, the training has to be more commercial. Currently, there is no such training for users like me."

"It could be a little bit easier or faster to be able to access data files without having to download anything."

"They do not yet have USB recovery but they are adding it in coming releases."

"The stability has room for improvement."

"In the next release I would like to see an improvement in the auto failover option."

"The support for object storage isn't quite there yet. Its public cloud support can be improved. I would love to see the public cloud support for object storage, and it would be great, but what I always hear from the folks at Carbonite is that in a lot of cases, it directly competes with their cloud offering. So, I don't know when or where that will go or if that will go anywhere, but we are hopeful to see something. The dashboard is a little outdated. If they gave it a facelift and put some better design around their dashboard, that would be tremendous. I generally care less about the visual aesthetics of an application as long as it does what it needed to do, which is true in the case of this solution. We also have the Microsoft 365 platform. Because they're two separate platforms, I have to log in to my Microsoft platform to manage it, and I have to log into my Carbonite server backup platform to manage it. Having these two coexist together in one management console is really what we're looking for, but we went for it knowing this. We also knew that there would be some integration coming down the road. So, we're again hoping to see some of that coming in 2021."

"The Hyper-V backup has room for improvement."

"The upgrade process is a bit dated and could use some changes."

"The backup speed needs improvement."

"I would love to see BackBlaze B2 implementation in the future, as that would be our preferred cloud destination, but Amazon and Wasabi are both very great choices in the meantime."

"More statistic options would be a great feature."

"There are many features we have not had the opportunity to try, such as Tape Backups, Office 365 backups, and many other things."

"I would like to have the option of creating a subfolder per job in the backup repository because we had an issue where some files were corrupted and we lost the backup of the majority of the VMs."

"So far, there is no version that supports Polish. If such a version existed, many customers in our region would decide to purchase and implement this solution."

"We'd like to see a legacy environment backup, like AIX, etc."

More NAKIVO Backup & Replication cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is reasonable."

"The solution is open source."

"The pricing is between $120 and $150 per year."

"We pay 9,000 dollars per year for our license."

"The prices are high."

"The licensing model is crystal clear on the website."

"It has a much higher bang for the buck than other products we evaluated."

"It's really cheap, and our company saves a significant amount of money on IT backup solutions per year."

"The licensing currently allows for host-based licensing, which is advantageous if you have a lot of data on a few hosts."

"The licensing model is very affordable compared to competitors, with a good quality-to-cost ratio, and the software is quite simple and fast to setup."

"The product is quite cheap compared to other products on the market, but despite this, it is rich in features both at the level of backup and recovery as well as at the level of additional options."

"From the perspective of Indian users, the cost is a little bit high."

More NAKIVO Backup & Replication pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	80
Midsize Enterprise	16
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Nakivo compare with Veeam Backup & Replication?

Nakivo is my favorite backup software. Below are the main benefits of Nakivo compared to Veeam 1. Low cost. 2. Backup storage with global deduplication (this is the main requirement of a backup sol...

See all answers

What do you like most about Nakivo?

NAKIVO Backup & Replication is very easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nakivo?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is very positive. The pricing is very low, and the licensing process makes it easy to obtain any quote.

See all answers

Comparisons

HPE Zerto Software vs Carbonite Server

Compared 13% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Carbonite Server

Compared 8% of the time

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs Carbonite Server

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Spectrum Protect Plus vs Carbonite Server

Compared 5% of the time

SugarSync vs Carbonite Server

Compared 5% of the time

More Carbonite Server Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 22% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 8% of the time

Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 7% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 5% of the time

ExaGrid Tiered Backup Storage vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 5% of the time

More NAKIVO Backup & Replication Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Backup

January 2026

Download Carbonite Server product report

Buyer's Guide

NAKIVO Backup & Replication

January 2026

Download NAKIVO Backup & Replication product report

Also Known As

Carbonite Recover Backup

No data available

Overview

Carbonite Server securely replicates data to the local backup server while securing a second copy in the cloud. Granular restore and local failover options ensure rapid recovery and minimal data loss. With integrated hardware and cloud failover for critical systems, Carbonite Server provides reliable data protection.

OpenText

NAKIVO Backup & Replication delivers rapid deployment and intuitive management across environments like Windows, Linux, and NAS. It is known for fast VM recovery, robust data protection, and cloud integration with competitive pricing.

NAKIVO Backup & Replication supports diverse IT landscapes, offering efficient deduplication, offsite backups, and policy-based replication. Its granular file restores, effective compression, and seamless cloud integration make it a preferred choice for minimizing downtime and enhancing business resilience. Users highlight its security measures, flexible deployment options, and automatic backups as core strengths. However, further enhancements in interface refinement, storage array integrations, and broadened support for virtual technologies and physical machine backups could enhance user satisfaction. Users seek improved control over alerts, better reporting capabilities, and optimized deduplication and compression.

What are the key features of NAKIVO Backup & Replication?

Fast VM Recovery: Minimal downtime with quick restore options for virtual machines.
Deduplication & Compression: Efficient data storage through advanced deduplication techniques and compression.
Cloud Integration: Seamless operations with cloud platforms like AWS for flexible backup solutions.
Policy-Based Replication: Automated replication policies ensuring consistent and reliable data backup.
Granular File Restores: Restore specific files without needing full system recovery, saving time and resources.

What benefits should users look for when evaluating NAKIVO Backup & Replication?

Competitive Pricing: Cost-effective solution with robust features.
Ease of Use: Intuitive management for a hassle-free experience.
Reliable Performance: Consistent results in protecting and recovering data.
Strong Support: Responsive customer service catering to user needs.

In industries like technology and finance, NAKIVO Backup & Replication is essential for securing virtual environments such as VMware and Hyper-V. Its deployment on NAS devices and capability for offsite backups to cloud platforms like AWS are appreciated. Organizations utilize it for backup, replication, and recovery of virtual machines using daily and incremental methods, ensuring efficient data protection and disaster recovery processes.

Nakivo

Sample Customers

INLINE Commercial Construction, Hamilton County

Coca Cola, Honda, 3M, University of Arizona, University of Maryland, University of Arkansas, Johns Hopkins University, Marriott, Radisson Hotels and Resorts, Fujifilm, Eiffage

Buyer's Guide

Carbonite Server vs. NAKIVO Backup & Replication

December 2025

Free Report: Carbonite Server vs. NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Find out what your peers are saying about Carbonite Server vs. NAKIVO Backup & Replication and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Carbonite Server vs. NAKIVO Backup & Replication report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.