Coming October 25: PeerSpot Awards will be announced! Learn more

CA XCOM Data Transport vs XM SendSecure comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
BMC Logo
33,681 views|13,420 comparisons
Broadcom Logo
1,040 views|812 comparisons
OpenText Logo
53 views|32 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA XCOM Data Transport and XM SendSecure based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed CA XCOM Data Transport vs. XM SendSecure report (Updated: September 2022).
636,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The cost is basically $100 a job, give or take."
  • "This is an area where it is a little difficult to work with BMC. They want to do licenses by job, which is what we have. For example, the simplest is to license by job, but they can also license by nodes. While the licensing is simple to use, it might not be the correct licensing model for the customer. It is okay because we want to license by job, which is something measurable. At the end of the day, licensing by job is the most important."
  • "The cost of the hardware is high. Because you need to license each job, it is costly."
  • "You're going to spend a lot of money upfront, but the benefits you're going to get out of it are going to quickly pay for it."
  • "Initially, our licensing model was based on the number of jobs per day. That caused some issues because we were restricted to a number. So at our renewal time we said, 'We want to convert from number of jobs to number of endpoints.' That cost us extra money but it gave us additional capabilities, without worrying about the number of jobs."
  • "BMC's price is based on the number of jobs."
  • "You must accept that BMC licensing can be very confusing. No one can easily understand how they calculate things, whether it is user-based, job-based, or server-based. The calculation is quite tough. How BMC calculates licensing is not easily available anywhere."
  • "There are human costs in addition to the standard pricing and licensing of this solution."
  • More Control-M Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.
    636,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful… more »
    Top Answer:Hi! I don't know the "Oracle DAC Scheduler", but I can say that in most competitive solutions Control-m stands out in… more »
    Top Answer:We have a better picture of our auditability. When someone comes to us, and asks for sources, "How did the deltas… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Control M
    Learn More
    Overview

    Control-M simplifies application and data workflow orchestration on premises or as a service. It makes it easy to build, define, schedule, manage, and monitor production workflows, ensuring visibility, reliability, and improving SLAs.

    • Accelerate new business applications into production—by embedding workflow orchestration into your CI/CD pipeline
    • Scale Dev and Ops collaboration, with a Jobs-as-Code approach
    • Simplify workflows across hybrid and multi-cloud environments with AWS, Azure and Google Cloud Platform integrations
    • Deliver data-driven outcomes faster, managing big data workflows in a scalable way
    • Take control of your file transfer operations with integrated, intelligent file movement and visibility

    Get automated high-performance, secure movement of mission-critical data and files.
    CA XCOM Data Transport’s reliable delivery and automated transmission recovery features help maintain data integrity throughout the processing environment while supporting enterprise security standards with robust data encryption and auditing capabilities.

    Discover OpenText XM SendSecure™, the enterprise-grade secure file exchange solution that balances defense-in-depth security with uncomplicated simplicity. Keep your data safe while facilitating compliance with HIPAA, PCI-DSS, GDPR, FERPA, SOX and more with an easy-to-use cloud-based solution.

    Offer
    Learn more about Control-M
    Learn more about CA XCOM Data Transport
    Learn more about XM SendSecure
    Sample Customers
    CARFAX, Tampa General Hospital, Navistar, Amadeus, Raymond James, Railinc
    Greenchoice, R+V Versicherung, Italian Interior Ministry, Vodafone Turkey
    OCHIN, Pacific Life Insurance Company, Neptune Energy, Department for International Development, British American Tobacco, ZOLL Medical, Matson Logistics
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm32%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Retailer8%
    Healthcare Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm24%
    Computer Software Company20%
    Insurance Company9%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm43%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Insurance Company7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise79%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise78%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise80%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Managed File Transfer (MFT)
    September 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, HelpSystems, Seeburger and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: September 2022.
    636,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CA XCOM Data Transport is ranked 16th in Managed File Transfer (MFT) while XM SendSecure is ranked 38th in Managed File Transfer (MFT). CA XCOM Data Transport is rated 0.0, while XM SendSecure is rated 0.0. On the other hand, CA XCOM Data Transport is most compared with AWS Transfer for SFTP, CompleteFTP, Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct, IBM Sterling File Gateway and HelpSystems GoAnywhere MFT, whereas XM SendSecure is most compared with .

    See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

    We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.