We performed a comparison between CA XCOM Data Transport and XM SendSecure based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
Control-M simplifies application and data workflow orchestration on premises or as a service. It makes it easy to build, define, schedule, manage, and monitor production workflows, ensuring visibility, reliability, and improving SLAs.
Get automated high-performance, secure movement of mission-critical data and files.
CA XCOM Data Transport’s reliable delivery and automated transmission recovery features help maintain data integrity throughout the processing environment while supporting enterprise security standards with robust data encryption and auditing capabilities.
Discover OpenText XM SendSecure™, the enterprise-grade secure file exchange solution that balances defense-in-depth security with uncomplicated simplicity. Keep your data safe while facilitating compliance with HIPAA, PCI-DSS, GDPR, FERPA, SOX and more with an easy-to-use cloud-based solution.
CA XCOM Data Transport is ranked 16th in Managed File Transfer (MFT) while XM SendSecure is ranked 38th in Managed File Transfer (MFT). CA XCOM Data Transport is rated 0.0, while XM SendSecure is rated 0.0. On the other hand, CA XCOM Data Transport is most compared with AWS Transfer for SFTP, CompleteFTP, Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct, IBM Sterling File Gateway and HelpSystems GoAnywhere MFT, whereas XM SendSecure is most compared with .
See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.
We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.