Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CA NetMaster File Transfer Management vs webMethods.io comparison

Broadcom and IBM are both solutions in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category. Broadcom is ranked #40, while IBM is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.1. Broadcom holds a 0.0% mindshare in MFT, compared to IBM’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution.
CA NetMaster File Transfer ...
  • 50 Views
  • 50 Comparison Views
webMethods.io
Read 93 webMethods.io reviews
  • 9,897 Views
  • 396 Comparison Views
94% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between CA NetMaster File Transfer Management and webMethods.io based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Fortra, BMC and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT).

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Managed File Transfer (MFT) Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 861,803 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CA NetMaster File Transfer ...
Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)
40th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
webMethods.io
Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)
9th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
93
Ranking in other categories
Business-to-Business Middleware (3rd), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), API Management (9th), Cloud Data Integration (7th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category, the mindshare of CA NetMaster File Transfer Management is 0.0%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 2.3%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
 

Featured Reviews

Use CA NetMaster File Transfer Management?
Share your opinion
MohanPrasad - PeerSpot reviewer
Smooth integration and enhanced deployment with high licensing cost
webMethods.io was used to integrate APIs through the webMethods.io platform, trigger database events, and connect backend APIs through a Java backend. It was used extensively for integration purposes in my organization Integration became smoother, troubleshooting was easier, and deployment and…
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
861,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Retailer
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Built.io Flow?
The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?
webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?
webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io Logo
IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io
Compared 8% of the time
Apigee vs webMethods.io Logo
Apigee vs webMethods.io
Compared 7% of the time
IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io Logo
IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io
Compared 7% of the time
IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io Logo
IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io
Compared 4% of the time
Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io Logo
Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io
Compared 4% of the time
More webMethods.io Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
June 2025
CA NetMaster File Transfer Management reportDownload CA NetMaster File Transfer Management product report
Buyer's Guide
webMethods.io
June 2025
webMethods.io reportDownload webMethods.io product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API
 

Overview

CA NetMaster File Transfer Management enables you to be aware of the status of critical file transfers and allows for actions based on defined data center policies. If you do any kind of file transport, CA NetMaster can provide you with enhanced visibility of your scheduled and unscheduled file transfers.

Broadcom

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM
 

Sample Customers

Hill International, SAIF, Travelport, Sky
Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
June 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Fortra, BMC and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
861,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.