We performed a comparison between CA Endevor Software Change Manager and Micro Focus ChangeMan ZMF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Software Configuration Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"The management and information CA Endevor Software Change Manager provides is very useful"
"The most valuable features are stability and ease of use."
"Scalability is great. It has absolutely met every need for us so far. We do have some concurrent development paths and we're able to flexibly assign variables. At the same time, our skeletons assemble where we want them to, so the scalability is very good."
"We audit once a year for our ChangeMan access, accurate financial programs, and all of that. Auditors really love ChangeMan for how easy it is to get through and how tight the security is on it. Our internal auditors, external auditors, and SOX editors love this solution. We're in the healthcare business, so HIPAA regulations and all such things are a big deal, and this makes all that really simple."
"There should be better integration between CA Endevor Software Change Manager and Zowe."
"I would like to have better integration with other products."
"As such, there's nothing wrong with the product. It is great, but there are small things that can be better to make it much more friendly. The way you navigate through fields can be improved. If I'm going to stage a component over something that exists and that I've created in another library, and I want to pull it in and write it over what I've got there in my package, I've got to type in that data set name every time. That can be aggravating. It is not a big deal. The way things are sorted can also be improved. If you're doing a delete of a bunch of components, you can't sort those out by type or anything. Some things are just standard, and you can't look at them in a way that would be helpful."
"I would like to see them enable parallel development for online. It's available now for batch stuff on the mainframe. Jenkins, IBM, and Rocket all supposedly already have safe and workable version of Git for the mainframe. With that in mind, we need to know where our feature is."
CA Endevor Software Change Manager is ranked 2nd in Software Configuration Management with 2 reviews while Micro Focus ChangeMan ZMF is ranked 5th in Software Configuration Management with 2 reviews. CA Endevor Software Change Manager is rated 9.6, while Micro Focus ChangeMan ZMF is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of CA Endevor Software Change Manager writes "Stable, easy to use, effective for source code management in a mainframe environment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus ChangeMan ZMF writes "It simplifies things and has tight security but needs better technical support and a few enhancements". CA Endevor Software Change Manager is most compared with BMC Compuware ISPW, CA Harvest Software Change Manager, IBM Rational ClearCase and IBM Engineering Workflow Management, whereas Micro Focus ChangeMan ZMF is most compared with BMC Compuware ISPW and Micro Focus Dimensions CM. See our CA Endevor Software Change Manager vs. Micro Focus ChangeMan ZMF report.
See our list of best Software Configuration Management vendors.
We monitor all Software Configuration Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
