Endevor vs Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) comparison

Broadcom and Rocket Software are both solutions in the Software Configuration Management category. Broadcom is ranked #3, while Rocket Software is ranked #6. Broadcom holds a 19.8% mindshare in SCM, compared to Rocket Software’s 8.8% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Rocket Software users who would recommend it.

Endevor

Read 45 Endevor reviews

1,746 Views
1,694 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (forme...

Read 3 Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) reviews

564 Views
564 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Endevor

Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (forme...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Endevor and Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Software Configuration Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Endevor vs. Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Endevor vs. Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product)

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 880,844 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Endevor

Ranking in Software Configuration Management

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mainframe Application Development (2nd)

Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (forme...

Ranking in Software Configuration Management

6th

Average Rating

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Software Configuration Management category, the mindshare of Endevor is 19.8%, down from 34.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) is 8.8%, up from 7.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Software Configuration Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Endevor	19.8%
Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product)	8.8%
Other	71.4%

Software Configuration Management

Featured Reviews

Haim Ben Zagmi

R&D Team Leader at First International Bank of Israel

A highly stable tool for managing mainframe software development projects that require significant expertise

We use the basic feature set of Endevor to control and track all of the sales operations within our company. It is a very good product that allows safe management of the individual components. The tools are specifically designed for mainframe environments, providing features tailored to the…

Read full review

reviewer1527093

Development Team Lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Very flexible with Johnny-on-the-spot tech support

I would like to see them enable parallel development for online. It's available now for batch stuff on the mainframe. Jenkins, IBM, and Rocket all supposedly already have safe and workable version of Git for the mainframe. With that in mind, we need to know where our feature is. Unfortunately, as good as ChangeMan is, if we're listing downfalls, they should be talking to me about this. Not me having to go talk to them about it. Hopefully, they have this in the works and they are positioning their product for the future. That's just a straightforward comment. It really comes down to whether they are complacent or not. The other thing that should improve is cost. Git, even on the mainframe, a large part of the components "free". They're the way you set them up yourselves and they're self-sustaining and built into the infrastructure. You can't charge me for that. I gave ChangeMan an overall score of eight, but what could drive them to a nine is coming up with a way for all my code that belongs together to be tracked and moved together. Everything should move based upon the mainframe; it needs to be alerted and synchronized.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Endevor is easy to use."

"It was an easy install. Since it was all set up, it pretty much runs itself now."

"Stability has been really good. I have actually never had to open an issue or report an issue since I have been running it."

"They've got plug-ins now to run it through Eclipse, they've got a lot of APIs, they handle UNIX files. I can't really think of any serious lack that they haven't addressed."

"The most valuable feature of Endevor is customization and ease of use."

"Being able to compare versions is helpful."

"We have been able to replicate entire SDLCs for new clients and have them loaded and ready to use Endevor in as little as one week. This was possible with the use of Endevor variables within the processors, so that a single processor was able to function for multiple systems across the entire SDLC."

"We can make it do pretty much whatever we want, depending on just how complicated we want it to be, as it is pretty flexible."

More Endevor pros

"Scalability is great. It has absolutely met every need for us so far. We do have some concurrent development paths and we're able to flexibly assign variables. At the same time, our skeletons assemble where we want them to, so the scalability is very good."

"We audit once a year for our ChangeMan access, accurate financial programs, and all of that. Auditors really love ChangeMan for how easy it is to get through and how tight the security is on it. Our internal auditors, external auditors, and SOX editors love this solution. We're in the healthcare business, so HIPAA regulations and all such things are a big deal, and this makes all that really simple."

Cons

"The customer service and support team are not helpful."

"It is still kind of behind the times. It needs to catch up with all the millennials that want a distributed look and feel."

"Interfacing with some change control products that are not CA's, it's a little glitchy on the approvals of changes. It requires special needs for the users for approvals."

"If I had to comment on an area of improvement or something new in the next or future version, I would like to see AI-assisted coding and impact analysis for mainframes."

"The initial setup can be less complex and has room for improvement."

"Sometimes finding errors and output can be difficult because it spits out so many messages that it is hard to figure out which ones are the ones you need to look at and what flow did it actually take through the processor."

"The solution is very expensive."

"One feature of Endevor is its Backout feature. If there is a problem, it can back out the executables. The only problem with that is that it will not back out the source in Endevor. For example, you can do a back out and it will back out the executable to the previous version, but it doesn't back out the source version in Endevor. It would make it much better if when you did a back out of Endevor, it would back out both the source and the executable and keep them in sync."

More Endevor cons

"I would like to see them enable parallel development for online. It's available now for batch stuff on the mainframe. Jenkins, IBM, and Rocket all supposedly already have safe and workable version of Git for the mainframe. With that in mind, we need to know where our feature is."

"As such, there's nothing wrong with the product. It is great, but there are small things that can be better to make it much more friendly. The way you navigate through fields can be improved. If I'm going to stage a component over something that exists and that I've created in another library, and I want to pull it in and write it over what I've got there in my package, I've got to type in that data set name every time. That can be aggravating. It is not a big deal. The way things are sorted can also be improved. If you're doing a delete of a bunch of components, you can't sort those out by type or anything. Some things are just standard, and you can't look at them in a way that would be helpful."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is very expensive."

"It's worth the value. The pricing is fairly good, justifiable for the return on investment."

"It's competitively priced and, as far as I know, it's just an enterprise license. We have found it is worth the money."

"The product is expensive."

"Licensing is fairly simple, you don't need multiple licenses."

"Just make sure if you are going to license, ensure you license the right features."

"It's on a yearly basis. I am not aware of any additional costs."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Configuration Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,844 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

30%

Insurance Company

13%

Computer Software Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

21%

Insurance Company

11%

Non Profit

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	39

No data available

Comparisons

BMC AMI DevX vs Endevor

Compared 59% of the time

IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs Endevor

Compared 12% of the time

CA Harvest Software Change Manager vs Endevor

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Endevor

Compared 5% of the time

More Endevor Competitors

BMC AMI DevX vs Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product)

Compared 32% of the time

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product)

Compared 12% of the time

IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product)

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Dimensions CM vs Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product)

Compared 7% of the time

More Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Endevor

January 2026

Download Endevor product report

Buyer's Guide

Software Configuration Management

January 2026

Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) report

Download Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) product report

Also Known As

CA Endevor Software Change Manager, Endevor Software Change Manager, CA Software Change Manager for Mainframe, CA Endevor SCM

Open Text, Micro Focus ChangeMan ZMF

Overview

Endevor is a comprehensive tool designed for managing source code within mainframe environments, known for its robust version control, data security, and audit trail capabilities, all contributing to efficient application life cycle management.

Endevor offers extensive customization, automation that reduces manual tasks, and seamless integration with Enterprise DevOps, which makes it suitable for managing complex development processes. It simplifies version tracking and history logging, enhancing traceability, which is crucial for audits. Security controls ensure code safety and the integrity of application migrations. However, users see room for improvement in streamlining the setup complexity and enhancing the graphical interface to cater to non-mainframe platform users.

What are the key features of Endevor?

Data Security: Offers strong security measures to protect code and data.
Audit Trail: Provides comprehensive monitoring of changes for audit readiness.
Version Control: Maintains robust version management for code consistency.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with Enterprise DevOps for streamlined workflows.
Customization: Allows flexible modifications to suit specific needs.
Automation: Reduces manual tasks with automated processes.
Standardized Processing: Ensures consistent operations across environments.

What benefits should users seek in Endevor reviews?

Efficiency: Reduced manual tasks leading to cost-effective project management.
Consistency: Standardized operations improve reliability and performance.
Traceability: Enhanced version tracking supports thorough audits and compliance.
Security: Robust protections safeguard valuable code against unauthorized access.
Flexibility: Customization options meet unique development demands.
Integration Capabilities: Complements existing dev workflows effectively.
Scalability: Supports large-scale development projects with ease.

In industries reliant on mainframes, Endevor is pivotal for managing source code efficiently. It facilitates application migration, software change management, and automates compilation processes. Organizations value its role in maintaining code integrity and providing the necessary security and auditing capabilities. Implementation often involves development teams utilizing it for managing testing cycles, coordinating multi-client applications, and ensuring seamless production deployments.

Broadcom

Change management solutions that tackle the complexity of developing, deploying and maintaining software applications.

Rocket Software

Sample Customers

Blue Hill Data Services Inc.

SPTS Technologies, Generali France, Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. (BBH), Kutxa-Vital-Banco Madrid, Space and Naval Warfare Information Technology Center (SPAWAR ITC)

Buyer's Guide

Endevor vs. Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product)

December 2025

Free Report: Endevor vs. Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product)

Find out what your peers are saying about Endevor vs. Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,844 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Endevor vs. Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) report.

See our list of best Software Configuration Management vendors.

We monitor all Software Configuration Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.