Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management and OpenText Business Process Monitoring based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Anonymous User
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The technical support and documentation are quite good."

More Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management Pros →

"Automates processes and allows reports and statistics to improve the speed at which changes and assets are managed.""The stability has been very good over the years."

More OpenText Business Process Monitoring Pros →

Cons
"The UI could be better. When I look at the dashboard, for example, the information looks cluttered and unorganized."

More Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management Cons →

"The solution should offer better integration with other tools from a service management perspective.""Product documentation is lacking, and sometimes, incorrect. Having better documentation will allow business analysts and data center personnel to rely on the Micro Focus help desk less."

More OpenText Business Process Monitoring Cons →

Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:Synthetic Monitoring is a very good capability as we can simulate the end-user interaction with the application and proactively we can discover issues before the real end users are impacted.
Top Answer:Here are some ways that Micro Focus APM (RUM and BPM) can help you identify the root cause of application issues Real User Monitoring (RUM) collects data from real users as they interact with… more »
Ranking
Views
67
Comparisons
27
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
479
Comparisons
393
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
CA Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management
Micro Focus Business Process Monitor, HPE Business Process Monitor
Learn More
Broadcom
Video Not Available
Overview

CA Cross-Enterprise APM provides 24/7 monitoring of business transactions for complex application environments by monitoring the real-time performance of mainframe subsystems and providing CA Application Performance Management with this data on a single pane of glass.

OpenText Business Process Monitoring is an Application monitoring software.

Proactively and consistently monitor business processes to identify performance issues before they affect users.

Review affected service level agreements.

BPM provides consistent, predictable measurements that help you associate the business impact with its root cause.

Sample Customers
NIIT Technologies, Cetip Safeguards
United Airlines, Vodafone Ireland, TEB, The Australian Red Cross Blood Service
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company17%
Computer Software Company14%
Financial Services Firm14%
Wholesaler/Distributor9%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business24%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise67%
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management is ranked 104th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while OpenText Business Process Monitoring is ranked 57th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management is rated 6.0, while OpenText Business Process Monitoring is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management writes "Good technical support and scales well for cloud deployments but needs better UI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Business Process Monitoring writes "Stable with good performance visibility but is a discontinued product". Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management is most compared with , whereas OpenText Business Process Monitoring is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics and Datadog.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.