No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Cuckoo Sandbox vs bucket/av comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

bucket/av
Ranking in Anti-Malware Tools
24th
Average Rating
10.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.5
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Cuckoo Sandbox
Ranking in Anti-Malware Tools
20th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Anti-Malware Tools category, the mindshare of bucket/av is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cuckoo Sandbox is 1.6%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Anti-Malware Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Cuckoo Sandbox1.6%
bucket/av0.5%
Other97.9%
Anti-Malware Tools
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2900358 - PeerSpot reviewer
DevOps Lead at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
Reduced manual security overhead while file scanning integrates seamlessly into existing workflows
My experience with the procurement process was easy.It was really easy to buy bucket_av through the AWS Marketplace; I encountered no problems. My thoughts about the metering and billing experience are positive, as bucket_av provides their own dashboard for the volumes and data usage, so it is fairly easy to see how much data is going through and the amount of money it costs. My advice to others looking into using bucket_av is that if you want a bolt-on solution to scan S3s, I think it is a perfect solution if you do not want to modify your application code that is already using an S3 bucket. I give this product a rating of five out of five.
Adrián Rodriguez Garcia - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Threat Intelligence & Hunting Analyst/Consultant at Wise Security Global
Provides detailed behavior analysis while needing improvements in signature detection
I use Cuckoo Sandbox primarily for automated malware behavior analysis. Specifically, it helps me extract indicators of compromise (IOC) to add to different platforms in the security environment of my company Cuckoo can show me every behavior in a machine. For example, it shows all files…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Anti-Malware Tools solutions are best for your needs.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
45%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Healthcare Company
6%
University
11%
Government
9%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for bucket/av?
The pricing is competitive, but I wish it was a little cheaper.
What needs improvement with bucket/av?
The pricing is a little high. We still need to evaluate if pricing is acceptable once we start scanning more objects.
What is your primary use case for bucket/av?
We use BucketAV for scanning S3 objects for potential malware and viruses.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cuckoo Sandbox?
I don't know the price as I always use the free version of Cuckoo Sandbox.
What needs improvement with Cuckoo Sandbox?
The only issue is with the installation, which requires some adjustments. We need to check the OS level for compatibility. This can be challenging for those who are new to Cuckoo Sandbox.
What is your primary use case for Cuckoo Sandbox?
We are using Cuckoo Sandbox ( /products/cuckoo-sandbox-reviews ) for phishing emails and malware analysis.
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, OPSWAT and others in Anti-Malware Tools. Updated: September 2026.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.