BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS vs Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials comparison

BMC and Redgate are both solutions in the Database Development and Management category. BMC is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.0, while Redgate is ranked #8. BMC holds a 0.4% mindshare in DDM, compared to Redgate’s 6.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Redgate users who would recommend it.

BMC Data Management for IMS...

Read 2 BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS reviews

52 Views
45 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essent...

Read 2 Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials reviews

1,258 Views
578 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BMC Data Management for IMS...

Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essent...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS and Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials are competitive products in database management. BMC has an edge with comprehensive IBM integration, while Redgate stands out with user-friendly tools for development teams.

Features: BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS provides advanced integration with IBM systems, robust performance optimization, and high scalability for enterprise use. Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials offers a suite of tools for effective database development, integrated version control, and enhanced team collaboration, prioritizing simplicity in development environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BMC is integrated into IBM zOS environments, offering specialized solutions with thorough customer support but is complex due to its enterprise scale. Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials ensures straightforward deployment and superior customer service, ideal for smaller teams needing rapid setup and support.

Pricing and ROI: BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS involves higher costs due to its enterprise-level features and integration, resulting in significant ROI for larger operations. Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials has lower initial costs, providing quick ROI with productivity-enhancing tools, appealing to budget-conscious development teams.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS vs. Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS vs. Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC Data Management for IMS...

Ranking in Database Development and Management

21st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essent...

Ranking in Database Development and Management

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Database Development and Management category, the mindshare of BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS is 0.4%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials is 6.1%, up from 5.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Database Development and Management

Featured Reviews

RobertSamson

Technical Consultant at Services Robert Samson SCRS

Improves disaster recovery processes and offers an efficient CPU cycle optimization

Using BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on z/OS has greatly improved our database administration tasks. Although we don't test the database before production, we have experienced benefits in disaster recovery situations and capacity management. For instance, when facing capacity issues during peak transaction times, I've been able to quickly allocate additional resources to ensure smooth operations. This has been crucial, especially during times when the demand surges, such as peak flight hours.

Read full review

ChristopherSmith1

Director, Enterprise Data Management at Glatfelter Insurance Group

SQL Search and change automation functionality help us manage our code repository and databases

The biggest problem with the Redgate SQL Toolbelt is just how heavy it is; it seems to take a lot of resources. It takes a lot of memory and a lot of processing power to run, and that tends to slow things down a bit. Making it a little more lightweight while still doing the same thing, as much as possible, is what we would like to see in the future. I've noticed that Microsoft SSMS runs much quicker without RedGate installed than it does with it installed. From bootup of the app to opening query windows and connections, SSMS is quicker without Redgate than with, by a significant margin. The other area for improvement is regarding licensing. Every month or two my SSMS loses it's redgate license key and I need to re-enter the key to continue using Red Gate, even though the license is annual.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"BMC Data Management improved our data recovery process by simplifying it."

"I have worked with DB2's great features in the last five years. The IDAA feature transformed the vision of warehousing, business analytics, and big data at my bank. Besides the mainframe, I saw that this solution was evolutionary. It gives real-time information."

"The most valuable feature is SQL Search."

"It is easy to track the reports, this is what is most valuable for me."

Cons

"DB2 is a hard tool to grasp. It's hard for users to learn how to use it. It's not easy to see how it works."

"One area for improvement with this product could be in providing clearer guidance and tools for disaster recovery planning and execution."

"I would like to see the bandwidth increase allowing me to easily analyze more data."

"The biggest problem with the Redgate SQL Toolbelt is just how heavy it is; it seems to take a lot of resources."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The cost is about $3,500 USD per individual to buy, and then it's about 20% per year for renewal."

"Our fees are paid on an annual basis."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database Development and Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

31%

Insurance Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Logistics Company

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS?

BMC Data Management improved our data recovery process by simplifying it.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS?

One area for improvement with this product could be in providing clearer guidance and tools for disaster recovery planning and execution. As someone involved in managing infrastructure, understandi...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS?

From my perspective as an infrastructure guy, the most valuable aspect of BMC's data management solutions was their ability to optimize CPU cycles, improving IMS performance without directly impact...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

No data available

IDERA SQL Diagnostic Manager for SQL Server vs Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials

Compared 21% of the time

Quest Spotlight vs Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials

Compared 12% of the time

Quest Foglight for Databases vs Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials

Compared 11% of the time

Nutanix Database Service vs Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials

Compared 11% of the time

SolarWinds Database Performance Analyzer vs Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials

Compared 10% of the time

More Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Database Development and Management

April 2025

BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS report

Download BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS product report

Buyer's Guide

Database Development and Management

April 2025

Download Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials product report

Also Known As

BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on z/OS, Data Management for IMS and DB2 on z/OS

No data available

Overview

Transform the management of your DB2 databases to meet the scale and complexity of digital business

Run DB2 utilities with BMC Next Generation Technology to optimize your data and improve application performance
Eliminate downtime and increase availability of business services
Ensure the integrity of structured and unstructured data
Take control with intelligent automation and policy-driven rules
Bridge the gap from green-screen to modern, secure, self-service user interfaces
Move to DB2 12 and beyond with confidence

BMC

Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials provides DBA teams with advanced tools for SQL development and deployment. It enhances productivity by simplifying complex tasks related to database management.

Designed for professionals managing SQL databases, Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials offers an integrated suite to streamline development pipelines and ensure deployments are efficient and error-free. It supports SQL code management, version control, and automated deployments, making it indispensable for organizations focusing on database performance and management. Its ease of integration and intuitive functionalities cater specifically to an audience that requires precision and reliability in database administration, providing an effective solution for maintaining high standards in database operations.

What are the most valuable features?

Version Control: Seamless integration with source control systems for managing SQL code changes.
Deployment Automation: Streamlines deployment processes, reducing human error and maintenance time.
Code Comparison: Highlights differences in SQL codes for better decision-making and debugging.
Performance Monitoring: Tools to monitor database processes and optimize performance effectively.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Improved Efficiency: Automates routine tasks, reducing manual oversight and freeing up valuable resources.
Risk Mitigation: Advanced version control and change tracking reduce database-related risks.
Time Savings: Speeds up development and deployment cycles, providing quicker turnarounds.

Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials finds application in industries managing significant data workloads like finance, healthcare, and retail. Its deployment features ensure seamless integration into existing infrastructure, supporting critical operations dependent on robust database architecture. It aligns with industry-specific demands by offering reliable solutions tailored with precision.

Redgate

Sample Customers

Airline Tariff Publishing Co (ATPCO), AtTask, MetaScale

Thinger.fi, Churchill College Univeristy of Cambridge, Margin Business Solutions Ltd., 4Penny.net, Sportinginsider.net, Lockheed Martin, Phillip Securities Pte Ltd, Nmbrs

Buyer's Guide

BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS vs. Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials

April 2025

Free Report: BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS vs. Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS vs. Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS vs. Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials report.

See our list of best Database Development and Management vendors.

We monitor all Database Development and Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.