BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) comparison

BMC and Google are both solutions in the Cloud Monitoring Software category. BMC is ranked #45, while Google is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.0. BMC holds a 0.3% mindshare in CMS, compared to Google’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Google users who would recommend it.

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Read 5 BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management reviews

455 Views
177 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Google Cloud's operations s...

Read 10 Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) reviews

2,709 Views
1,111 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Google Cloud's operations s...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management and Google Cloud's operations suite compete in cloud management solutions. Google Cloud's operations suite has the upper hand due to its comprehensive features despite BMC having better pricing and support.

Features: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management provides robust lifecycle management, customizable automation, and enhanced resource management efficiency. Google Cloud's operations suite features extensive monitoring, logging, and tracing capabilities, integrating seamlessly with Google's cloud infrastructure for an all-encompassing view of cloud operations.

Room for Improvement:BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management could improve its integration capabilities with broader platforms, streamline its interface for better usability, and simplify its automation workflows. Google Cloud's operations suite could enhance its initial cost structure, provide more personalized support options, and offer offline deployment functionalities for increased adaptability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management has a more complex deployment due to its customization options, which could lead to longer setup times. Its customer service is known for personalized support. Google Cloud's operations suite benefits from fast deployment with minimal configuration, leveraging its infrastructure. Its support is backed by comprehensive documentation and community assistance.

Pricing and ROI: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management offers attractive pricing aligned with flexible deployment needs, providing reasonable ROI for those seeking detailed control. Google Cloud's operations suite might have higher initial costs, but its efficient process management and integration can lead to higher long-term ROI by enhancing operational efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 862,624 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

45th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (39th)

Google Cloud's operations s...

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

20th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (27th), Log Management (29th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) is 1.1%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Entprssol67

Enterprise Solution Architect at Engineering Ingegneria Informatica SPA

Helps design blueprints in a cloud environment but the support is a major problem

One of the major problems is that support is not so good. I used to have a support expert in Spain but they left two years ago. BMC doesn't invest a lot in network automation but network automation is a major point in CLM. There aren't any experts here in Europe, maybe they have in America, I don't know. The main problem is the support in Europe. We had a lot of problems with the people who got put on our cases. The agents that we were assigned to were not so capable. They wanted to replicate the problem. If you have an incident, it takes a lot of time to troubleshoot the problem. The incident support is not so good. The technicians don't know the platform well. BMC doesn't want to invest in CLM. Two years ago we had a lot of problems. Maybe BMC realized that CLM is an end of life product.

Read full review

Anand_Patel

Senior Technical Architect at T-Systems International GmbH

Offers reliable Ops Agent and logging transport feature with easy third-party integrations

As part of our company, we implemented several changes in our log analytics pattern, including the storage and procurement process. Earlier, before implementing the solution, our company was able to procure only one year of data, but later, we came to the three-year mark. Around 15-20% reduction has been witnessed in the total analytic consumption of our company. The aforementioned result was possible because the solution allowed the creation of a dashboard where factors like storage costs, proportion of logs, and logs presence in a storage bucket or BigQuery can all be checked. Earlier all logs were stored in a raw storage, but currently our company is able to move logs in table bucket that contributes towards cost savings.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Automates Java EE Application Deployment from an SCM system."

"Supports unattended installs and image-based, script-based, or template-based provisioning."

"CLM has a multi-cloud portal because they have the resources to implement in various environments in various ports."

"Integrates role-based access control with pre-configured policies for CIS, DISA, HIPAA, PCI, SOX, NIST, and SCAP documentation and remediation."

"By allowing end users to request their own services, the request process for systems is much quicker and more accurate."

"Assesses change impact or completes an audit using multiple dashboard views."

"You can tie together your public and private cloud infrastructure into a "single pane of glass"."

"The most valuable feature is the multi-cloud integration, where there is support for both GCP and AWS."

"Our company has a corporate account for Google Cloud and so our systems and clusters integrate really well."

"The features that I have found most valuable are its graphs - if I need any statistics, in Kubernetes or Kong level or VPN level, I can quickly get the reports."

"We find the solution to be stable."

"Offers a valuable logging transport feature"

"Google's technical support is very good."

"It's easy to use."

"I like the monitoring feature."

More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) pros

Cons

"The installation and configuration can be tricky due to it being built on Remedy."

"Needs integrations with other providers to provide a custom public cloud environment."

"One of the major problems is that support is not so good."

"The product provides minimal metrics that are insufficient."

"It could be more stable."

"Lacking sufficient operations documentation."

"This solution could be improved if it offered the ability to analyze charts, such as a solution like Kibana."

"It could be even more automated."

"While we are satisfied with the overall performance, in certain cases we must add additional metrics and additional tools like Grafana and Dynatrace."

"If I want to track any round-trip or breakdowns of my response times, I'm not able to get it. My request goes through various levels of the Google Cloud Platform (GCP) and comes back to my client machine. Suppose that my request has taken 10 seconds overall, so if I want to break it down, to see where the delay is happening within my architecture, I am not able to find that out using Stackdriver."

"The logging functionality could be better."

More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The cost could be lower."

"The cost of using Stackdriver depends on usage."

"We have a basic standard license without any additional costs."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

862,624 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with Google Stackdriver?

If the errors are caught early in the interface, it would be easier for users to manage. The process of logging analytics can be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Google Stackdriver?

I use the solution for logging, defining alerts, and monitoring. Our company's Java and Python logging teams mainly use it.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Google Stackdriver?

The Ops Agent and logging transport feature of the solution have had a major impact on improving application performance. The solution also allows the transport of logs into log buckets, which is h...

See all answers

Comparisons

CloudBolt vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 59% of the time

Pandora FMS vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 41% of the time

More BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management Competitors

AWS X-Ray vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 28% of the time

Datadog vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 19% of the time

New Relic vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 6% of the time

Dynatrace vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 5% of the time

Prometheus Group vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 5% of the time

More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

June 2025

Download BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

July 2025

Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) report

Download Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) product report

Also Known As

BMC CLM

Google Stackdriver, Stackdriver Monitoring, Stackdriver Logging, Google Cloud Monitoring

Overview

BMC's cloud management platform drives digital innovation with agile, full-stack service provisioning across cloud and traditional platforms. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management scales easily while integrating with essential compliance and governance policies to reduce risk.

BMC

Real-time log management and analysis

Cloud Logging is a fully managed service that performs at scale and can ingest application and platform log data, as well as custom log data from GKE environments, VMs, and other services inside and outside of Google Cloud. Get advanced performance, troubleshooting, security, and business insights with Log Analytics, integrating the power of BigQuery into Cloud Logging.

Built-in metrics observability at scale

Cloud Monitoring provides visibility into the performance, uptime, and overall health of cloud-powered applications. Collect metrics, events, and metadata from Google Cloud services, hosted uptime probes, application instrumentation, and a variety of common application components. Visualize this data on charts and dashboards and create alerts so you are notified when metrics are outside of expected ranges.

Stand-alone managed service for running and scaling Prometheus

Managed Service for Prometheus is a fully managed Prometheus-compatible monitoring solution, built on top of the same globally scalable data store as Cloud Monitoring. Keep your existing visualization, analysis, and alerting services, as this data can be queried with PromQL or Cloud Monitoring.

Monitor and improve your application's performance

Application Performance Management (APM) combines the monitoring and troubleshooting capabilities of Cloud Logging and Cloud Monitoring with Cloud Trace and Cloud Profiler to help you reduce latency and cost so you can run more efficient applications.

Google

Sample Customers

JDA Software, Morningstar, Orange Business Services, Wipro

Uber, Batterii, Q42, Dovetail Games

Buyer's Guide

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

July 2025

Free Report: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

862,624 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) report.

See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.