BioCatch vs Riskified comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
BioCatch Logo
1,782 views|1,035 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Riskified Logo
1,012 views|704 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BioCatch and Riskified based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention.
To learn more, read our detailed Fraud Detection and Prevention Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It can track mouse movements as well as the actual oriental moments of such as the movement of devices, how they are held, and the angles which at they are held. All these are captured for customers and a behavioral profile is built for the customer over a period of time. This would be matched against any fraudulent behavior. If, for example, suddenly a customer account seems to be accessed by our profile, which is not one particular customer account, if the movements or habits are suspect, we can catch the fraud and shut it down."

More BioCatch Pros →

"The most valuable features of this solution are the scoring and the yes, or no function.""Our clients have definitely avoided losing money on multiple occasions due to fraud.""The scoring mechanism is good."

More Riskified Pros →

Cons
"BioCatch is one of the fraud detection tools which also has machine learning capabilities and it has what is called a machine learning model feature. It is run in the background. The consequence of those machine models is it is complex to perform data functions and the activity and programming techniques. The decision-making for determining what's happening within those models is a little bit complex and not at all transparent. It's not easy for businesses to understand how the model is using the data of the bank customers in order to come to the assumption it does."

More BioCatch Cons →

"The fraud channel is a sensitive spot, so it's always complex.""The user interface could be more intuitive.""I can't think of any issues that we've faced that need to be improved."

More Riskified Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "It is determined by the requirements of each company."
  • More Riskified Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
    768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The most valuable features of this solution are the scoring and the yes, or no function.
    Top Answer:The user interface could be more intuitive.
    Top Answer:Riskified is for fraud prevention. The solution sits close to the gateway. It screens orders and rejects those that have a high fraud profile.
    Ranking
    Views
    1,782
    Comparisons
    1,035
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    1,012
    Comparisons
    704
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    237
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Forter logo
    Compared 49% of the time.
    Kount logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    Amazon Fraud Detector logo
    Compared 11% of the time.
    Accertify Interceptas logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Learn More
    Riskified
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    BioCatch is a cybersecurity company that delivers behavioral biometrics, analyzing human-device interactions to protect users and data. Banks and other enterprises use BioCatch to significantly reduce online fraud and protect against a variety of cyber threats, without compromising the user experience.

    Riskified's fraud detection solution protects eCommerce merchants from chargebacks while minimizing the impact of false declines on online revenues. Machine learning models eliminate the need to manually adjust fraud detection, and elastic linking drives decision speed and accuracy.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    ALDO, Macy's, Finish Line, Burlington, Burton Group, Sky-tours, GiftCards.com, Kirna ZabĂȘte
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm56%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Comms Service Provider4%
    Insurance Company3%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Retailer16%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise80%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise62%
    Buyer's Guide
    Fraud Detection and Prevention
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: March 2024.
    768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    BioCatch is ranked 5th in Fraud Detection and Prevention while Riskified is ranked 4th in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 3 reviews. BioCatch is rated 8.0, while Riskified is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of BioCatch writes "Stable with good behavioral biometrics and great technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Riskified writes "Integrates well, reasonably priced, and the technical support is helpful". BioCatch is most compared with ThreatMetrix, IBM Trusteer, Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub and F5 Shape Security, whereas Riskified is most compared with Forter, Kount, Amazon Fraud Detector and Accertify Interceptas.

    See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.

    We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.