We performed a comparison between Azure Stream Analytics and Cloudera DataFlow based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Streaming Analytics solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The way it organizes data into tables and dashboards is very helpful."
"It's a product that can scale."
"I appreciate this solution because it leverages open-source technologies. It allows us to utilize the latest streaming solutions and it's easy to develop."
"We find the query editor feature of this solution extremely valuable for our business."
"I like the way the UI looks, and the real-time analytics service is aligned to this. That can be helpful if I have to use this on a production service."
"The most valuable features are the IoT hub and the Blob storage."
"I like the IoT part. We have mostly used Azure Stream Analytics services for it"
"The most valuable features of Azure Stream Analytics are the ease of provisioning and the interface is not terribly complex."
"This solution is very scalable and robust."
"The initial setup was not so difficult"
"DataFlow's performance is okay."
"The solution could be improved by providing better graphics and including support for UI and UX testing."
"Its features for event imports and architecture could be enhanced."
"One area that could use improvement is the handling of data validation. Currently, there is a review process, but sometimes the validation fails even before the job is executed. This results in wasted time as we have to rerun the job to identify the failure."
"The only challenge was that the streaming analytics area in Azure Stream Analytics could not meet our company's expectations, making it a component where improvements are required."
"Easier scalability and more detailed job monitoring features would be helpful."
"There may be some issues when connecting with Microsoft Power BI because we are providing the input and output commands, and there's a chance of it being delayed while connecting."
"The solution’s customer support could be improved."
"It is not complex, but it requires some development skills. When the data is sent from Azure Stream Analytics to Power BI, I don't have the access to modify the data. I can't customize or edit the data or do some queries. All queries need to be done in the Azure Stream Analytics."
"It is not easy to use the R language. Though I don't know if it's possible, I believe it is possible, but it is not the best language for machine learning."
"It's an outdated legacy product that doesn't meet the needs of modern data analysts and scientists."
"Although their workflow is pretty neat, it still requires a lot of transformation coding; especially when it comes to Python and other demanding programming languages."
Azure Stream Analytics is ranked 3rd in Streaming Analytics with 22 reviews while Cloudera DataFlow is ranked 13th in Streaming Analytics with 3 reviews. Azure Stream Analytics is rated 8.2, while Cloudera DataFlow is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Azure Stream Analytics writes "Easy to set up and user-friendly, but could be priced better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cloudera DataFlow writes "A scalable and robust platform for analyzing data". Azure Stream Analytics is most compared with Amazon Kinesis, Databricks, Amazon MSK, Apache Flink and Apache Spark, whereas Cloudera DataFlow is most compared with Databricks, Confluent, Amazon MSK, Informatica Data Engineering Streaming and Hortonworks Data Platform. See our Azure Stream Analytics vs. Cloudera DataFlow report.
See our list of best Streaming Analytics vendors.
We monitor all Streaming Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.