Azure Search vs Elastic Search comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Microsoft Logo
1,910 views|1,626 comparisons
62% willing to recommend
Elastic Logo
3,993 views|1,325 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Azure Search and Elastic Search based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Search as a Service solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Azure Search vs. Elastic Search Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,496 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It provides good access capabilities to various platforms.""Offers a tremendous amount of flexibility and scalability when integrating with applications.""Creates indexers to get data from different data sources.""The product is pretty resilient.""The product is extremely configurable, allowing you to customize the search experience to suit your needs.""The customer engagement was good.""The search functionality time has been reduced to a few milliseconds.""The amount of flexibility and agility is really assuring."

More Azure Search Pros →

"A nonstructured database that can manage large amounts of nonstructured data.""Implementing the main requirements regarding my support portal​.""The product is scalable with good performance.""The most valuable feature of Elastic Enterprise Search is the opportunity to search behind and between different logs.""It is easy to scale with the cluster node model.​""The UI is very nice, and performance wise it's quite good too.""We can easily collect all the data and view historical trends using the product. We can view the applications and identify the issues effectively.""The most valuable features of Elastic Enterprise Search are it's cloud-ready and we do a lot of infrastructure as code. By using ELK, we're able to deploy the solution as part of our ISC deployment."

More Elastic Search Pros →

Cons
"For availability, expanding its use to all Azure datacenters would be helpful in increasing awareness and usage of the product.​""Adding items to Azure Search using its .NET APIs sometimes throws exceptions.""It would be good if the site found a better way to filter things based on subscription.""The initial setup is not as easy as it should be.""For SDKs, Azure Search currently offers solutions for .NET and Python. Additional platforms would be welcomed, especially native iOS and Android solutions for mobile development.""The after-hour services are slow.""The solution's stability could be better.""The pricing is room for improvement."

More Azure Search Cons →

"Elastic Search needs to improve its technical support. It should be customer-friendly and have good support.""Elastic Search could benefit from a more user-friendly onboarding process for beginners.""Elastic Enterprise Search could improve its SSL integration easier. We should not need to go to the back-end servers to do configuration, we should be able to do it on the GUI.""Technical support should be faster.""I have not been using the solution for many years to know exactly the improvements needed. However, they could simplify how the YML files have to be structured properly.""I would like to be able to do correlations between multiple indexes.""It should be easier to use. It has been getting better because many functions are pre-defined, but it still needs improvement.""There is an index issue in which the data starts to crash as it increases."

More Elastic Search Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "​When telling people about the product, I always encourage them to set up a new service using the free pricing tier. This allows them to learn about the product and its capabilities in a risk-free environment. Depending on their needs, the free tier may be suitable for their projects, however enterprise applications will most likely required a higher, paid tier."
  • "For the actual costs, I encourage users to view the pricing page on the Azure site for details.​"
  • "I think the solution's pricing is ok compared to other cloud devices."
  • "I would rate the pricing an eight out of ten, where one is the low price, and ten is the high price."
  • "The solution is affordable."
  • "The cost is comparable."
  • More Azure Search Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "ELK has been considered as an alternative to Splunk to reduce licensing costs."
  • "An X-Pack license is more affordable than Splunk."
  • "​The pricing and license model are clear: node-based model."
  • "This is a free, open source software (FOSS) tool, which means no cost on the front-end. There are no free lunches in this world though. Technical skill to implement and support are costly on the back-end with ELK, whether you train/hire internally or go for premium services from Elastic."
  • "We are using the free version and intend to upgrade."
  • "It can be expensive."
  • "This product is open-source and can be used free of charge."
  • "We are using the open-sourced version."
  • More Elastic Search Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Search as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
    767,496 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The after-hour services are slow. It could be better.
    Top Answer:We use the solution to link the Active Directory account to Office 365.
    Top Answer:Logsign provides us with the capability to execute multiple queries according to our requirements. The indexing is very high, making it effective for storing and retrieving logs. The real-time… more »
    Top Answer:I don't see improvements at the moment. The current setup is working well for me, and I'm satisfied with it. Integrating with different platforms is also fine, and I'm not recommending any changes or… more »
    Ranking
    6th
    out of 13 in Search as a Service
    Views
    1,910
    Comparisons
    1,626
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    395
    Rating
    6.8
    1st
    out of 13 in Search as a Service
    Views
    3,993
    Comparisons
    1,325
    Reviews
    27
    Average Words per Review
    501
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Amazon Kendra logo
    Compared 68% of the time.
    Amazon Athena logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    Solr logo
    Compared 3% of the time.
    Algolia logo
    Compared 3% of the time.
    Faiss logo
    Compared 14% of the time.
    Milvus logo
    Compared 13% of the time.
    Pinecone logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Amazon Kendra logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    OpenText IDOL logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Elastic Enterprise Search, Swiftype, Elastic Cloud
    Learn More
    Overview
    Azure Search is a search-as-a-service cloud solution that gives developers APIs and tools for adding a rich search experience over your data in web, mobile, and enterprise applications. Functionality is exposed through a simple REST API or .NET SDK that masks the inherent complexity of search technology. In addition to APIs, the Azure portal provides administration and prototyping support. Infrastructure and availability are managed by Microsoft.

    Elasticsearch is a prominent open-source search and analytics engine known for its scalability, reliability, and straightforward management. It's a favored choice among enterprises for real-time data search, analysis, and visualization. Open-source Elasticsearch is free, offering a comprehensive feature set and scalability. It allows full control over deployments but requires managing and maintaining the infrastructure. On the other hand, Elastic Cloud provides a managed service with features like automated provisioning, high availability, security, and global reach.

    Elasticsearch excels in handling time-sensitive data and complex search requirements across large datasets. Its scalability allows it to handle growing data volumes efficiently, maintaining high performance and fast response times. Integrated with Kibana, Elasticsearch enables powerful data visualization, providing real-time insights crucial for data-driven decision-making.

    Elastic Cloud reduces operational overhead and improves scalability and performance, though it comes with associated costs. It is available on your preferred cloud provider — AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud. Customers who want to manage the software themselves, whether on public, private, or hybrid cloud, can download the Elastic Stack.

    At its core, Elasticsearch is renowned for its full-text search capabilities, capable of performing complex queries and supporting features like fuzzy matching and auto-complete.

    Peer reviews from various professionals highlight its strengths and weaknesses. Pros include its detection and correlation features, flexibility, cloud-readiness, extensibility, and efficient search capabilities. However, users have noted challenges like steep learning curves, data analysis limitations, and integration complexities. The platform is generally viewed as stable and scalable, with varying degrees of satisfaction regarding its usability and feature set.

    In summary, Elasticsearch stands out for its high-speed search, scalability, and versatile analytics, making it a go-to solution for organizations managing large datasets. Its adaptability to different enterprise needs, robust community support, and continuous development keep it at the forefront of enterprise search and analytics solutions. However, potential users should be aware of its learning curve and the need for skilled personnel for optimization.

    Sample Customers
    XOMNI, Real Madrid C.F., Weichert Realtors, JLL, NAV CANADA, Medihoo, autoTrader Corporation, Gjirafa
    T-Mobile, Adobe, Booking.com, BMW, Telegraph Media Group, Cisco, Karbon, Deezer, NORBr, Labelbox, Fingerprint, Relativity, NHS Hospital, Met Office, Proximus, Go1, Mentat, Bluestone Analytics, Humanz, Hutch, Auchan, Sitecore, Linklaters, Socren, Infotrack, Pfizer, Engadget, Airbus, Grab, Vimeo, Ticketmaster, Asana, Twilio, Blizzard, Comcast, RWE and many others.
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Insurance Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Computer Software Company27%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Insurance Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise63%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise69%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    Azure Search vs. Elastic Search
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Search vs. Elastic Search and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    767,496 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Azure Search is ranked 6th in Search as a Service with 8 reviews while Elastic Search is ranked 1st in Search as a Service with 59 reviews. Azure Search is rated 7.4, while Elastic Search is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Azure Search writes "Good performance for standard faceted search and full-text search". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Elastic Search writes "Played a crucial role in enhancing our cybersecurity efforts ". Azure Search is most compared with Amazon Kendra, Amazon Athena, Amazon AWS CloudSearch, Solr and Algolia, whereas Elastic Search is most compared with Faiss, Milvus, Pinecone, Amazon Kendra and OpenText IDOL. See our Azure Search vs. Elastic Search report.

    See our list of best Search as a Service vendors.

    We monitor all Search as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.