Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs Couchbase Capella comparison

Microsoft and Couchbase are both solutions in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category. Microsoft is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.8, while Couchbase is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.5. Microsoft holds a 3.3% mindshare in DS, compared to Couchbase’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Couchbase users who would recommend it.

Azure Database for PostgreSQL

Read 23 Azure Database for PostgreSQL reviews

2,850 Views
1,824 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Couchbase Capella

Read 2 Couchbase Capella reviews

463 Views
245 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azure Database for PostgreSQL

Couchbase Capella

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 18, 2026

Couchbase Capella and Azure Database for PostgreSQL compete in the cloud database market. Couchbase Capella has the upper hand in cost-effectiveness and ease of integration, while Azure Database for PostgreSQL shines in comprehensive features and structured data handling.

Features: Couchbase Capella provides dynamic applications with NoSQL capabilities, flexible scalability, and advanced data synchronization. Azure Database for PostgreSQL supports ACID compliance, extensive analytical tools, and structured data handling.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Couchbase Capella offers seamless integration and straightforward deployment for rapid setup. Azure Database for PostgreSQL provides comprehensive deployment options, detailed documentation, and strong customer support for in-depth assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Couchbase Capella is more cost-effective with lower initial setup costs, enhancing ROI. Azure Database for PostgreSQL, though more expensive, delivers greater long-term value with its advanced features, attracting those investing in relational database solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs. Couchbase Capella Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs. Couchbase Capella

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Database for PostgreSQL

Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)

5th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (5th)

Couchbase Capella

Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)

15th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Data Analysis (18th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category, the mindshare of Azure Database for PostgreSQL is 3.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Couchbase Capella is 1.4%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Database as a Service (DBaaS) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Azure Database for PostgreSQL	3.3%
Couchbase Capella	1.4%
Other	95.3%

Database as a Service (DBaaS)

Featured Reviews

Sathish Palanisamy

Staff Data Engineer at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

Improves database performance, supports AI integration, and accelerates customer-focused innovation

Azure Database for PostgreSQL can be improved in the area of elastic capabilities. One of the things we were actively looking for is the elastic feature, which was made a GA at this Ignite event. I am really happy that finally in Azure, we have a product which we can use for elastic clusters. If you are bound with a single server, then you have a vertical limit. Now you do not have any limits. As long as your use case grows, we can grow. The only thing I would maybe be thinking about is we should also allow customers to pick different node sizes for every node inside the elastic eventually. Some nodes do not need that big capacity. So that may be a nice-to-have feature, though it is not a must-have at this point.

Read full review

SupriyaKulkarni

Devops Specialist at Amdocs

Good GUI, easy to learn, and simple to install

The architecture is complex. I do understand that. However, the GUI is very user-friendly. Sometimes all these things are a little difficult to understand for a person who is not experienced in Couchbase. There is a constant requirement to upgrade the versions. We need to constantly keep on upgrading the latest version for the newest one. Currently, we are dealing with an issue where some of the servers are on the 6.5 version, and a few have moved to 7.5. So we are in a mixed mode right now. We are having a high IO issue on our servers, which we are already dealing with. We have these cases with Couchbase, with Red Hat, et cetera. We feel like this constant need to upgrade is something that is very mundane yet a very difficult task. If you have three clusters, which have around thirty nodes, the data is quite sensitive. Whenever there is Couchbase upgrade that is going on, we see that our SR is dropped. The purchase rate and success rate drop. This affects our business and the clients. Rebalancing could be improved. I find it to be a very slow process when it comes to rebalancing the clusters. If you talk about other architectures like Oracle, they are pretty fast. Couchbase is a little slower. Rebalancing, taking the node out, doing the upgrade, putting it back, rebalancing it, is a very difficult and cumbersome. For Oracle, we have been running on version 19.5 for the past five years. There were absolutely no issues. Yet for Couchbase, every six months, we have to go do the upgrade.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Automatic patching and backups have saved us time; anything automatic is a blessing—it allows us to be hands-off, and the reliability has been very good with it."

"Compared to my previous expenses for maintaining an on-premise PostgreSQL database, Azure Database for PostgreSQL is far easier, far simpler, and far cheaper in my opinion."

"I rate Azure Database for PostgreSQL 10 out of 10."

"Our organization's database uptime has improved after implementing Azure Database for PostgreSQL, particularly with the flexible server's redundant configuration capabilities, which allow for failovers and read-only configurations."

"The most valuable features of Azure Database for PostgreSQL are its networking capabilities, which allow for integration with other Azure services."

"The most valuable features of Azure Database for PostgreSQL for us are reliability, performance, and cost, making it a good cost-benefit for us."

"Overall, we are satisfied with Microsoft solutions and recommend them."

"I rate Azure Database for PostgreSQL 10 out of 10."

Cons

"Azure Database for PostgreSQL has not really helped reduce infrastructure costs at my company."

"Performance is one area that has constraints for our customers. I believe there could be improvements in the mirroring part and Change Data Capture (CDC)."

"The critical service is the Azure OpenAI service. It would help to make it simpler and easier to integrate with that or cognitive services."

"We would love to definitely see scalability. We would love to see it grow as more people use it and it can handle the data and maybe tell us some optimizations by reporting on what we have."

"Coming from a traditional Oracle Exadata setup, all queries will run faster because Oracle has that optimization layer in between which optimizes it for you, which is why you pay a lot of money for that. When you come to Azure Database for PostgreSQL, that layer is gone."

"While the flexibility of the server for financial reasons is understandable, better switching between primary and backup would make transitions smoother."

"There aren't any notable areas for improvement that I could see. PostgreSQL was self-sufficient with no need for additional database knowledge to maintain it."

"We had to move to a CSP. This has been a significant challenge. We experienced trouble with our CSP and had to change CSPs because we could not get the level of support we needed from them."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We do not pay for a full-year subscription because our usage is still at the beginning phase and not much. The pay-as-you-go model works well for us."

"There aren't any notable areas for improvement that I could see. PostgreSQL was self-sufficient with no need for additional database knowledge to maintain it."

"The pricing experience is positive. Azure Database for PostgreSQL reduces the need for hardware investments, and the pay-as-you-go pricing model positively affects database-related costs by allowing us to start small and scale as needed."

"The pay-as-you-go pricing model plays a critical role in managing database-related costs and resource allocation. We build using Infrastructure as Code (IAC) and maintain a focus on FinOps to control Azure service costs. Some clients are pushy on price. It's critical to automate it, so we're just using it when appropriate and switching it off in certain scenarios."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service (DBaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Marketing Services Firm

12%

Educational Organization

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	16

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Database for PostgreSQL?

My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing for Azure Database for PostgreSQL is positive; I appreciate it all. The pricing is very cost-effective and stable given that we have many data...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Database for PostgreSQL?

Azure Database for PostgreSQL can be improved in ways I'm very curious to explore with Horizon. I'm interested in seeing how the fully enterprise-hardened features change things and where that blur...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Azure Database for PostgreSQL?

My main use cases for Azure Database for PostgreSQL came from a personal project to scratch an itch, and it was the easiest one to go grab. I appreciate how easy PostgreSQL is to get running locall...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Couchbase Capella?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Couchbase Capella?

The solution is basically used to support our ordering system, which generates a huge number of orders for our customers.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Couchbase Capella?

We are Counchbase customers. Depending on your application, it is good to use Couchbase where you have high OLTP systems where you know there will be constant data loading, deleting, et cetera, hap...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs Azure Database for PostgreSQL

Compared 22% of the time

Amazon RDS vs Azure Database for PostgreSQL

Compared 13% of the time

MySQL vs Azure Database for PostgreSQL

Compared 12% of the time

Oracle Database as a Service vs Azure Database for PostgreSQL

Compared 10% of the time

PostgreSQL vs Azure Database for PostgreSQL

Compared 8% of the time

More Azure Database for PostgreSQL Competitors

Redis vs Couchbase Capella

Compared 31% of the time

Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs Couchbase Capella

Compared 29% of the time

Google Cloud Spanner vs Couchbase Capella

Compared 23% of the time

MongoDB Atlas vs Couchbase Capella

Compared 17% of the time

More Couchbase Capella Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Database for PostgreSQL

January 2026

Download Azure Database for PostgreSQL product report

Buyer's Guide

Database as a Service (DBaaS)

January 2026

Download Couchbase Capella product report

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Microsoft

Couchbase

Overview

Azure Database for PostgreSQL offers efficient management, robust networking, and seamless Microsoft integration. Known for its strong performance and high satisfaction in enterprise settings, it provides operational efficiency, security, and monitoring.

With features that facilitate Azure integration, easy configuration, and AI integration, Azure Database for PostgreSQL serves as a valuable choice for businesses requiring operational efficiency and cost-effectiveness. Users benefit from powerful vector capabilities, seamless Microsoft service integration, straightforward management, and user authentication ensuring high satisfaction. Easy optimization, query analysis, and backup operations make it suitable for varied enterprise applications. However, improvements in flexible scaling, cost-effectiveness of monitoring tools, and enhanced integration with Azure OpenAI would enhance its capabilities further.

What Are the Key Features of Azure Database for PostgreSQL?

Robust Networking: Offers seamless Azure integration to optimize cloud resources.
AI Integration: Simplifies incorporating artificial intelligence into databases.
Monitoring Tools: Provides comprehensive tools for efficient database management.
Security: Ensures user data is protected with high-standard security protocols.
Cost-Effectiveness: Delivers efficient operations with budget-friendly solutions.

What Benefits Should Users Consider?

Operational Efficiency: Streamlines database management tasks, reducing workload.
High Satisfaction: Receives positive feedback for its reliable performance in enterprises.
Enterprise Compatibility: Integrates across various Microsoft services for enhanced productivity.
User-Friendly Management: Facilitates straightforward database administration.
Scalability: Supports businesses with potential growth through flexible solutions.

Industries such as healthcare, retail, and finance leverage Azure Database for PostgreSQL for backend solutions, incident reporting, and public information sharing. Managed service providers utilize its strong performance for client needs, while administrators use it for applications like ControlM. Its flexibility supports containerized applications and disaster recovery, ensuring compatibility with diverse environments.

Microsoft

Couchbase Capella is a fully managed NoSQL DBaaS designed for optimal cloud-native performance. It integrates high-speed and flexible JSON applications with real-time analytics, supporting billion-scale vector search.

This platform is tailored for cloud environments, offering enhanced operational efficiency. It supports trusted mobile NoSQL for always-on apps and real-time JSON-native analytics without ETL processes. Couchbase Capella is unique in managing the complete data lifecycle for RAG and agentic systems, providing contextual memory and response validation, facilitating quick and cost-effective development of AI-driven applications.

What are the standout features of Couchbase Capella?

Fully Managed DBaaS: Removes the complexity of database management with automated processes.
Cloud-Native Performance: Optimizes speed and flexibility for internet applications.
JSON Application Support: Facilitates fast and flexible deployment of JSON-based applications.
Billion-Scale Vector Search: Handles extensive data searches efficiently.
Mobile NoSQL Integration: Ensures seamless offline capabilities for mobile apps.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides instant insights without the need for ETL.

What benefits or ROI should you seek in reviews for Couchbase Capella?

Cost-Effectiveness: Offers competitive pricing with high performance.
Operational Efficiency: Minimizes manual database management needs.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing datasets and application demands.
Flexibility: Supports a variety of use cases with its versatile structure.
Security: Prioritizes data protection and privacy.

In healthcare, Couchbase Capella aids in managing vast amounts of patient data with real-time analytics, ensuring fast application performance for critical decision-making. In retail, it enhances customer experiences through personalized recommendations and dynamic inventory management, while in finance, it supports secure, agile processing of transactions and fraud detection.

Couchbase

Buyer's Guide

Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs. Couchbase Capella

December 2025

Free Report: Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs. Couchbase Capella

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs. Couchbase Capella and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs. Couchbase Capella report.

See our list of best Database as a Service (DBaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Database as a Service (DBaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.