Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration vs webMethods.io comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 27, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration
Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware
14th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
8.4
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
webMethods.io
Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware
3rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
93
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (9th), API Management (10th), Cloud Data Integration (8th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Business-to-Business Middleware category, the mindshare of Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration is 2.1%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 11.1%, up from 8.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business-to-Business Middleware
 

Featured Reviews

SK
The user interface is easy to understand, but its performance could be improved
I also work with IBM Sterling B2B Integrator. Unlike Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration, IBM Sterling B2B Integrator doesn't have a UI-based platform to monitor all incoming and outgoing transactions. We use IBM Sterling B2B Integrator for everything, including transmission. We use Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration only for transmission purposes. We use Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration because it has a great user interface, which makes it very easy to monitor everything. IBM Sterling B2B Integrator is better than Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration because it is a very robust solution. Unlike cloud-based systems, IBM Sterling B2B Integrator can handle very complex logic. It can easily process files with 5 GB to 10 GB sizes. Once you take the license, you won't have to pay anything extra for computing power.
MohanPrasad - PeerSpot reviewer
Smooth integration and enhanced deployment with high licensing cost
webMethods.io was used to integrate APIs through the webMethods.io platform, trigger database events, and connect backend APIs through a Java backend. It was used extensively for integration purposes in my organization Integration became smoother, troubleshooting was easier, and deployment and…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The automation of all the data transfers is great."
"Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration has a great user interface that is easy to understand."
"Given that you have one integration API in place, it takes very minimal effort to scale it to any other application that might want to use the same. Its flow-based development environment is a breeze and makes it really easy to re-use most of the existing components and build up a new API."
"I like the solution's policies, transformation, mediation, and routing features."
"From a user perspective, the feature which I like the most about Integration Server is its designer."
"I would say the core Web-based integrations work the best. They are the most efficient and robust implementations one can do with webMethods."
"The cloud version of the solution is very easy to set up."
"I like the tool's scalability."
"The Software AG Designer has been great. It's very intuitive."
"Segregation of deployment for the environments is the most valuable feature of the solution."
 

Cons

"The solution's performance could be improved and made similar to that of IBM Sterling B2B Integrator."
"The initial setup can be a bit tricky."
"Perhaps in the area of Microservices, where I think Trading Networks could benefit from some improvements."
"The on-premises setup can be difficult."
"Technical support is an area where they can improve."
"It is quite expensive."
"I would like to have a dashboard where I can see all of the communication between components and the configuration."
"webMethods Integration Server needs to add more adapters."
"The interface needs some work. It is not very user-friendly."
"Other products have been using AI and cloud enhancements, but webMethods Integration Server is still lagging in that key area."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Compared to other SaaS platforms, the solution's pricing is less."
"I am not involved in the licensing side of things."
"webMethods Trading Networks is a bit costly compared to others solutions."
"The product is expensive."
"I signed a three-year deal with them. It is a yearly locked-in price for the next three years."
"This is not a cheap solution but, compared to other products such as those offered by IBM, the pricing is similar."
"I would like to see better pricing for the license."
"The price is a little bit high, especially regarding their support."
"The price of webMethods Integration Server isn't that high from an enterprise context, but open-source ESB solutions will always be the cheapest."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.
865,484 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Retailer
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration?
The solution's performance could be improved and made similar to that of IBM Sterling B2B Integrator.
What is your primary use case for Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration?
We use the solution for transmission purposes, where we send files from our system to the customer's system.
What do you like most about Built.io Flow?
The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?
webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.
What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?
webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.
 

Also Known As

B2Bi, Axway B2Bi, AMPLIFY B2B Integration
Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Procter & Gamble, ASEAN, OneHealthPort
Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings
Find out what your peers are saying about Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
865,484 professionals have used our research since 2012.