Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration vs webMethods.io comparison

Axway and IBM are both solutions in the Business-to-Business Middleware category. Axway is ranked #14 with an average rating of 7.0, while IBM is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.1. Axway holds a 2.1% mindshare in BBM, compared to IBM’s 10.6% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of Axway users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration

Read 2 Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration reviews

267 Views
119 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 93 webMethods.io reviews

990 Views
624 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 27, 2025

Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration and webMethods.io compete in the B2B integration category. webMethods.io appears to have the upper hand due to its rich features and perceived value despite higher costs.

Features: Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration provides strong data integration capabilities, comprehensive data tracking, and enhanced security features. webMethods.io stands out with its cloud-native architecture, advanced automation functionalities, and efficient integration processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration offers a flexible deployment model with reliable customer support for quick problem resolution. webMethods.io has a straightforward deployment process with extensive training resources, ensuring efficient customer interactions for tech-savvy businesses.

Pricing and ROI: Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration presents a budget-friendly initial setup cost with a competitive pricing structure promising favorable ROI. webMethods.io has a higher initial cost but justifies quicker ROI due to its advanced features and efficiency improvements, enhancing strategic investment returns.

To learn more, read our detailed Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration vs. webMethods.io

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,168 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

14th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

webMethods.io

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (9th), API Management (9th), Cloud Data Integration (7th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Business-to-Business Middleware category, the mindshare of Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration is 2.1%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 10.6%, up from 7.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business-to-Business Middleware

Featured Reviews

SantoshKumar11

Application Support Engineer (owner) at a pharma/biotech company with 1,001-5,000 employees

The user interface is easy to understand, but its performance could be improved

I also work with IBM Sterling B2B Integrator. Unlike Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration, IBM Sterling B2B Integrator doesn't have a UI-based platform to monitor all incoming and outgoing transactions. We use IBM Sterling B2B Integrator for everything, including transmission. We use Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration only for transmission purposes. We use Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration because it has a great user interface, which makes it very easy to monitor everything. IBM Sterling B2B Integrator is better than Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration because it is a very robust solution. Unlike cloud-based systems, IBM Sterling B2B Integrator can handle very complex logic. It can easily process files with 5 GB to 10 GB sizes. Once you take the license, you won't have to pay anything extra for computing power.

Read full review

MohanPrasad

Senior Consultant at Brillio

Smooth integration and enhanced deployment with high licensing cost

webMethods.io was used to integrate APIs through the webMethods.io platform, trigger database events, and connect backend APIs through a Java backend. It was used extensively for integration purposes in my organization Integration became smoother, troubleshooting was easier, and deployment and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The automation of all the data transfers is great."

"Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration has a great user interface that is easy to understand."

"The product supports various types of digital documents, including XMLs and EDI."

"webMethods platform is used to build an EAI platform, enabling communication between many internal systems and third-party operators."

"The MFT component of webMethods, for example, is easy to set up and convenient to use. It handles files very efficiently and it is easy to automate tasks with complex schedules. Monitoring is centralized to MWS which can be used to monitor other products as well (Trading Networks, BPM, MFT, etc.)"

"The tool supports gRPC."

"What I like the most about the solution is that it comes with ready-made tools like handling security tokens and OAuth."

"webMethods Trading Networks is a stable solution."

"The solution's ease-of-use is its most valuable feature, in which complex issues may be resolved."

"webMethods Integration Server is an easy-to-use solution and does not require a lot of coding."

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"The initial setup can be a bit tricky."

"The solution's performance could be improved and made similar to that of IBM Sterling B2B Integrator."

"We got the product via a reseller, and the support from the reseller has been less than desirable."

"Prices should be reduced, ideally by up to 30% for long-term customers like us."

"We need more dashboards and reporting engines that can provide detailed information for management. In short, we need better analytics."

"It is an expensive solution and not very suitable for smaller businesses."

"t doesn't represent OOP very well, just a method and proprietary interface called IData."

"As webMethods Integration Server is expensive, that's its area for improvement."

"The solution has big instances when deployed under microservices or in a containerized platform. They need to improve that so that it is competitive with other integration solutions, like Redis and Kafka. Deployments under microservices with those solutions are much more lightweight, in the size of the runtime itself, compared with Software AG."

"In terms of improvement, it would be better if it adapted quicker to open standards. It took a while for API specification before the last version was available. The spec of version two was rather quick."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Compared to other SaaS platforms, the solution's pricing is less."

"Initialy good pricing and good, if it comes to Enterprise license agreements."

"It is expensive, but we reached a good agreement with the company. It is still a little bit expensive, but we got a better deal than the previous one."

"Some who consider this solution often avoid it due to its high price."

"The price of webMethods Integration Server isn't that high from an enterprise context, but open-source ESB solutions will always be the cheapest."

"Always plan five years ahead and don’t jeopardize the quality of your project by dropping items from the bill of materials."

"The product is expensive."

"The price is a little bit high, especially regarding their support."

"It is worth the cost."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration?

Compared to other SaaS platforms, the solution's pricing is less.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration?

The solution's performance could be improved and made similar to that of IBM Sterling B2B Integrator.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration?

We use the solution for transmission purposes, where we send files from our system to the customer's system.

See all answers

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration

Compared 69% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration

Compared 31% of the time

More Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration Competitors

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 8% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business-to-Business Middleware

June 2025

Download Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

June 2025

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

B2Bi, Axway B2Bi, AMPLIFY B2B Integration

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Overview

Axway B2Bi is an advanced B2B gateway solution for establishing connections and managing information flows between your internal applications and your B2B community — on premise or in the cloud.

B2Bi provides the visibility you need to find information about business-critical files and messages, and the analytics you need to be proactive, react to exceptions, and improve your overall business processes and SLAs.

Axway B2Bi can replace or consolidate existing B2B and EDI systems and integrate transactions and processes with Oracle, SAP, Lawson and other business systems — all with easy partner on-boarding, high security and scalability, and built-in system administration.

Axway

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM

Sample Customers

Procter & Gamble, ASEAN, OneHealthPort

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration vs. webMethods.io

June 2025

Free Report: Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.