Axiad Conductor and Microsoft Entra External ID are prominent players in the identity and access management sector. Axiad Conductor appears to lead in customer satisfaction with its support and cost-efficiency benefits, while Microsoft Entra External ID has a notable advantage in feature variety, making it a compelling choice for many businesses.
Features: Axiad Conductor provides robust multi-factor authentication, seamless credential management, and efficient device lifecycle management. On the other hand, Microsoft Entra External ID offers extensive integration capabilities, advanced identity protection, and effective single sign-on solutions. While Axiad focuses on security and simplicity, Microsoft Entra's strength lies in its extensive integration and protection features.
Room for Improvement: Axiad Conductor could enhance its integration capabilities and diversify its feature offerings to match broader requirements. Additionally, improving automated processes for even faster deployment could be beneficial. Microsoft Entra External ID may improve by simplifying its initial deployment phase, providing more straightforward integration options with legacy systems, and enhancing user interface friendliness to reduce setup complexity.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Axiad Conductor is renowned for an easy deployment process, supported by responsive customer service that helps streamline implementation. Microsoft Entra External ID requires more effort initially due to its complex feature set, although it offers comprehensive support to aid this process. Axiad's streamlined setup is contrasted with Microsoft's intricate nature, affecting deployment experience.
Pricing and ROI: Axiad Conductor is considered cost-efficient with lower upfront costs that provide a meaningful ROI. Microsoft Entra External ID, with higher initial investments, is appreciated for its extensive features and associated long-term benefits. Axiad targets affordability while Microsoft emphasizes feature depth, aligning with different budget priorities.
It has led to cost savings as well as time savings because I can use a single solution for all applications.
Companies can leverage it for setting up external identities without needing to develop their own solutions.
In terms of return on investment, prior to using this product, our company managed our own mail server with all internal authentication happening on premises, resulting in a ROI in the thousands every year.
Companies without a Microsoft license for Entra ID or Azure portal cannot add Azure AD B2C, creating logistical issues for some of my clients who are unable to evaluate the platform.
The support for business applications, infrastructure support, and Entra has been mostly positive with highly skilled technicians.
The documentation is very thorough, reducing the need for support.
This is one of EID's weak points compared to Azure AD B2C, which offers customizable authentication options, including attribute and password combinations.
End-user workloads experience increased latency in a cloud environment compared to on-premises resources.
Microsoft Entra External ID is quite scalable, and I would rate its scalability between eight and nine out of ten.
I'd rate the stability of the Microsoft Entra External ID as a 10.
The stability of this solution is very good.
I have not encountered any stability issues with Microsoft Entra External ID.
This is particularly challenging during enterprise agreement renewals, as it's difficult for customers to review costs leading to lengthy negotiations.
Enhanced customizable login options and the ability to use attribute password logins are critical features that are required for Microsoft Entra External ID to gain dominance in the authentication market.
I would like to see a more detailed alert system that provides a summary of why alerts are generated, who is generating them, and the reasons behind it.
Regarding pricing, the cost seems high for single sign-on, especially for external applications like Oracle.
Microsoft's pricing is complex and difficult to fathom due to a range of different licensing options.
The cost can be a factor for Microsoft Entra External ID, but in general, it offers a scalable and efficient solution compared to deploying individual solutions.
It is crucial for hybrid environments, especially for integrating existing on-site infrastructures with cloud-based Active Directory, such as in Office 365 implementations.
EID unifies workforce users with external business partners, which is a very strong feature.
Microsoft's reliability in providing a clear roadmap for the solution is very important, especially at a time when cybersecurity is a risk in every company.
Axiad Conductor offers a user-friendly platform for managing multifactor authentication and credential lifecycle, supporting seamless transitions to cloud environments for enhanced security compliance and access control.
Axiad Conductor stands out with intuitive management of multifactor authentication systems, assertive device lifecycle management, and a managed cloud solution that streamlines operations. It promotes user self-service for credential updates, minimizing the need for extensive training. With the capability to handle large networks, it enhances efficiency while meeting contract demands. Addressing user suggestions, plans include interface design updates and Canadian hosting, although macOS's frequent updates pose integration challenges.
What are the principal features of Axiad Conductor?
What should users look for in terms of ROI and benefits?
In diverse industries, Axiad Conductor is implemented to manage multifactor authentication and PKI elements like smart cards and YubiKeys. Organizations leverage it to ensure compliance, facilitate secure workforce access, and transition PKI systems to the cloud, handling substantial volumes of smart card and machine certificates with ease.
Microsoft Entra External ID, part of Microsoft Entra, provides highly secure digital experiences for partners, customers, citizens, patients, or any users outside your organization with customization controls. Combine external identities and user directories in one portal to seamlessly manage access across the organization.
Microsoft Entra External ID refers to all the ways you can securely interact with users outside of your organization. If you want to collaborate with partners, distributors, suppliers, or vendors, you can share your resources and define how your internal users can access external organizations. If you're a developer creating consumer-facing apps, you can manage your customers' identity experiences.
With External ID, external users can "bring their own identities." Whether they have a corporate or government-issued digital identity, or an unmanaged social identity like Google or Facebook, they can use their own credentials to sign in. The external user’s identity provider manages their identity, and you manage access to your apps with Entra ID or Entra External ID to keep your resources protected.
The following capabilities make up External ID:
We monitor all Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.