AWS Shield vs Corero comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Corero are both solutions in the Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.4, while Corero is ranked #19 with an average rating of 7.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 6.9% mindshare in DDOS, compared to Corero’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Corero users who would recommend it.

AWS Shield

Read 7 AWS Shield reviews

2,537 Views
1,465 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Corero

Read 6 Corero reviews

1,246 Views
763 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

AWS Shield

Corero

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

Corero and AWS Shield are products in the DDoS protection category. AWS Shield has an upper hand in scalability and AWS service integration, whereas Corero is appealing with its competitive pricing and robust support.

Features: Corero provides comprehensive DDoS protection, real-time reporting, and analytics for quick threat identification. It is cost-effective and offers dedicated support. AWS Shield offers seamless integration with AWS services, high scalability, and automated threat detection.

Room for Improvement: Corero could enhance its scalability to rival AWS Shield and improve its integration capabilities. Its user interface, while informative, could also be more intuitive. AWS Shield can work on lowering costs for non-AWS users and enhancing its reporting features. Improved customer service responsiveness would also benefit AWS Shield.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Corero provides straightforward deployment and excellent customer support, simplifying the process for companies with no existing infrastructure. AWS Shield offers easier deployment for AWS users due to its tight integration within the AWS ecosystem, but relies more on automated systems, which might impact personalized support.

Pricing and ROI: Corero is known for lower setup costs and compelling ROI, especially for enterprises focusing on efficiency and budget. AWS Shield, although more expensive, offers value primarily to businesses heavily invested in AWS, with potential cost savings through integration efficiencies.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Shield vs. Corero Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Shield vs. Corero

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Shield

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Corero

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

19th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection category, the mindshare of AWS Shield is 6.9%, down from 7.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Corero is 2.8%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

Featured Reviews

Manikandan-R

Senior Project Manager at Synopsys Inc

Solution provides essential protection with good support and a simple setup

I have noticed a pattern developing in approximately five minutes. If it were possible to provide these patterns with historical data spanning six months, three months, or two months directly from the console, it would be extremely beneficial. It would allow for easy inquiries and facilitate the retrieval of relevant parts without having to manually check logs or examine movements. Instead, if all historical data were available, I could consult six months' worth of identified patterns efficiently through AWS without relying on external sources. This solution is particularly suitable for startups or medium-sized startups. I would rate the overall solution eight out of ten.

Read full review

Björn Lindman

Presales Specialist at Netnordic

The product is highly stable and has valuable features, but it must provide more Layer 7 capabilities

We use the solution for DDoS protection in the routers The DDoS protection features are valuable. The product must provide more Layer 7 capabilities. It must provide deep inspection features. I have been using the solution for ten years. The tool has high stability. I rate the stability a nine…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution operates smoothly at its baseline level, and we do not encounter any issues at that level."

"The product is easy to use."

"The product has a good mechanism to analyze trends and trigger events."

"I am impressed with the product's multiple features like security."

"We have integrated the tool with Active Directory. The most important feature is that it's transparent and doesn't degrade the performance of our solution. Additionally, it's easy to configure, which is crucial for us. It's easy to use and set up and stops attacks on our servers. We haven't encountered any attack problems because the solution stops them in real-time. AWS Shield specifically focuses on defending against denial-of-service attacks, making it a great solution for that type of threat."

"The solution's ease of use is the most valuable feature."

"It is quite scalable, and we have not faced any issues with its scalability."

"It is integrated with AWS. So, it gives you a good first step."

"It is an agnostic and transparent inline platform, which means that the maximum visibility of the symmetric and asymmetric traffic is available, even allowing bidirectional detection of the attack."

"It is a good solution. Its vendor support is the most valuable. It is simple and works well if you have Juniper MX routers."

"The most important aspect, in general, is that the price is suitable for most clients."

"The DDoS protection features are valuable."

"The most valuable feature of Corero is its ability to handle smaller attacks in terms of the amount of volume and time. You can handle almost 100 perfect of the attacks locally."

"This is a hybrid solution."

"SmartWall devices occupy only one-fourth of the width of a rack unit, making them very easy to install."

Cons

"We end up having to pay extra for features that AWS adds that we don't need."

"The time taken to detect anomalies must be reduced."

"The product should give users more flexibility to customize their security policies according to their requirements."

"The management of it is a bit hard. If you don't engineer it on the front side, it is hard to go back in and change it. It could be improved in terms of architecture requirements and then ongoing support requirements as a secondary component to it. People tend to set up things like this, and they just expect it to work without the care and feeding that needs to go back into it either from an application team or a network environment team."

"The product needs to improve its logs and reports to make it read better."

"Perhaps the time required to detect anomalies can be reduced. Presently, it takes some time to determine whether a situation is normal or abnormal."

"Perhaps the time required to detect anomalies can be reduced."

"The product is expensive."

"Lacks international presence."

"The product must provide more Layer 7 capabilities."

"Juniper is known in our country, but it is not very popular. There is also not enough information about Corero. Our enterprise and financial sectors don't know about this solution. They need to provide more information and do more marketing for this solution in our country."

"It could use support in Spanish."

"The approach taken by Corero is to partner with other organizations in order to address volumetric attacks that cannot be handled by the hardware installed in the infrastructure. Corero does not have a solution for these attacks, so they are looking for partners to help them manage them. This approach is supplemented by local hardware, but the main focus is on the partnerships. It would be beneficial to have a more complete solution."

"Corero needs to improve its application DDoS prevention capabilities and user behavior detection features."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's pricing is good."

"We pay $3000 per month for the solution."

"The cost depends on traffic each month, so on average, it costs us between US$200 and US$300 per month."

"It depends on your subscription level and the volume that you're spending with AWS. So, it is very relative to the consumption alignment in your subscription level. It is a well-constructed, scalable pricing option, but it is relative to how much you're spending on AWS. Because the more you spend, typically, the more you get off on services like this. I find it to be comparable to other solutions."

"The tool is cheap."

"Its price is normal."

"The price of Corero is affordable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

27%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS Shield?

We have integrated the tool with Active Directory. The most important feature is that it's transparent and doesn't degrade the performance of our solution. Additionally, it's easy to configure, whi...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Shield?

The tool is cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Shield?

Perhaps the time required to detect anomalies can be reduced. Presently, it takes some time to determine whether a situation is normal or abnormal. I am unsure how much this duration can be reduced...

See all answers

What do you like most about Corero?

The DDoS protection features are valuable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Corero?

Corero needs to improve its application DDoS prevention capabilities and user behavior detection features.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Corero?

I use Corero for network DDoS protection projects. It is particularly effective in providing protection against network DDoS attacks.

See all answers

Comparisons

Cloudflare vs AWS Shield

Compared 34% of the time

Azure DDoS Protection vs AWS Shield

Compared 23% of the time

Cloudflare One vs AWS Shield

Compared 18% of the time

Prolexic vs AWS Shield

Compared 4% of the time

Akamai App and API Protector vs AWS Shield

Compared 4% of the time

More AWS Shield Competitors

Arbor DDoS vs Corero

Compared 45% of the time

Radware DDoS vs Corero

Compared 17% of the time

Cloudflare vs Corero

Compared 13% of the time

Imperva DDoS vs Corero

Compared 6% of the time

Cisco Secure DDoS Protection vs Corero

Compared 6% of the time

More Corero Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Shield

June 2025

Download AWS Shield product report

Buyer's Guide

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

June 2025

Download Corero product report

Overview

AWS Shield is a managed Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) protection service that safeguards applications running on AWS. AWS Shield provides always-on detection and automatic inline mitigations that minimize application downtime and latency, so there is no need to engage AWS Support to benefit from DDoS protection.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Corero Network Security is dedicated to improving the security and availability of the Internet through the deployment of innovative DDoS & Network Security Solutions. The Corero SmartWall® Threat Defense System (TDS) family of products can be deployed in various topologies, (full edge protection or scrubbing). the SmartWall Threat Defense System (TDS) family of solutions utilizes modern DDoS mitigation architecture to automatically, and surgically remove DDoS attack traffic, while allowing good user traffic to flow uninterrupted.

The goal of the Corero automatic DDoS mitigation solution is to protect the customer’s network infrastructure, online services and confidential data from harmful DDoS attacks. The Corero solutions are the highest performing in the industry, while providing the most robust security coverage at unprecedented scale with the lowest total cost of ownership to the customer. These solutions are designed to provide real-time attack mitigation with continuous threat visibility, which allows our customers to also monetize DDoS Protection as-a-Service (DDPaaS) offerings.

Corero

Sample Customers

netflix, dow jones, mapbox, pearson, rovio, youview, moviestar planet, asurion, payplug, hour of code

Telesystem, Jagex, Hivelocity, Los Angeles Dedicated, Netrics hosting, Hyve, Zacks Investment Research, Dynamic Business Systems, G4BOX INC., GamersFirst, Fastmetrics, San Miguel County

Buyer's Guide

AWS Shield vs. Corero

June 2025

Free Report: AWS Shield vs. Corero

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Shield vs. Corero and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Shield vs. Corero report.

See our list of best Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection vendors.

We monitor all Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.