Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS Security Hub vs ThreatQ comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and ThreatQuotient are both solutions in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.6, while ThreatQuotient is ranked #22 with an average rating of 7.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 8.1% mindshare in SOAR, compared to ThreatQuotient’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ThreatQuotient users who would recommend it.
AWS Security Hub
Read 26 AWS Security Hub reviews
  • 7,414 Views
  • 2,891 Comparison Views
89% willing to recommend
ThreatQ
Read 2 ThreatQ reviews
  • 871 Views
  • 375 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

ThreatQ and AWS Security Hub both operate in the cybersecurity market, with distinct focuses. AWS Security Hub appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set, despite a higher cost.

Features: ThreatQ enhances threat intelligence with customizable workflows, integration capabilities, and robust intelligence collection to improve situational awareness. AWS Security Hub offers a unified view of security alerts by integrating seamlessly with AWS services, ensuring automated compliance checks and broader security management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ThreatQ ensures easy deployment and offers strong customer support, facilitating integration into existing infrastructures. AWS Security Hub simplifies the deployment process within AWS-centric environments thanks to its inherent compatibility but may require more effort to integrate into non-AWS setups.

Pricing and ROI: ThreatQ is considered cost-effective upfront, with predictable pricing and a significant return on investment through improved threat management. AWS Security Hub, although potentially higher in initial costs, is seen as a worthwhile investment due to its feature-rich offering that provides strategic value over time.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed AWS Security Hub vs. ThreatQ Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
AWS Security Hub vs. ThreatQ
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS Security Hub
Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
5th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (13th)
ThreatQ
Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
22nd
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (12th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category, the mindshare of AWS Security Hub is 8.1%, down from 9.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ThreatQ is 1.2%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
AWS Security Hub8.1%
ThreatQ1.2%
Other90.7%
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
 

Featured Reviews

Karthik Ekambaram - PeerSpot reviewer
Has helped identify misconfigurations and prioritize risks but lacks multi-cloud support and deeper integration features
AWS Security Hub cannot scale up to multiple different cloud environments; it only works for AWS. There are other products in the market for CSPM that can give you multi-cloud environment misconfigurations, even Microsoft for that matter. Regarding the integration of AWS Security Hub with third-party tools, I am not certain whether we can integrate them, but there is no need to do so. However, AWS Security Hub cannot integrate with other cloud providers, so it only supports the AWS environment. The compliance checks within AWS Security Hub are good, but we don't use them much. We utilize compliance frameworks such as CIS compliance frameworks and ISO 27017 framework, which are beneficial, but it can improve in other areas too, such as including NIST and other frameworks beyond just ISO and CIS. Improvements can be applicable for scalability, particularly on integration with multi-cloud environments, and compliance frameworks can be added for more variety as well. The unified dashboard in AWS Security Hub is adequate; I cannot say it is exceptional, but the content available in the dashboards is satisfactory for now.
Read full review
Yasir Akram - PeerSpot reviewer
Good reporting and pretty stable but needs to be simpler to use
The support team of ThreatQ set up a VM on our VPN, which was SlashNext's private VPN. Then we just initiated some system calls and ThreatQ provided us the configuration file with our settings (like our email, our API key, our URL, our category, etc.). They set up a VM on our private VPN cloud. And then they provided us the configuration file in which we just entered our details like our company URL, our API category, and API keys et cetera. We could just add it on the configuration file. We just uploaded it to the ThreatQ server. After running the system calls, we just initiated the ThreatQ and then performed tasks on the UI, such as categorizing the reports. If we only wanted the report for phishing, then we just manipulated the data on the UI and just extracted the reports. That's all. The deployment was complex. We used high hardware specifications. I don't remember the exact specifications, however, I recall them being high. There were some services that had some compatibility errors. That's why we had our VMs - to make sure that the customer would not face any errors. Everything's deployed with high specifications and custom specifications. That was the biggest challenge for us - to deploy on the customer VMs. On average, deployment takes 15-20 minutes if it's deployed without any errors. I was with one of the NetOps network admin during deployment. We were only two people and we just deployed and installed all services and we executed the deployment.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"AWS Security Hub has very good integration features. It allows for AWS native services integration, and it helps us to integrate some of the services outside of AWS. They have partners, such as Amazon Preferred Network Partners (APN). If you have different security tools around APN, we can integrate those findings with AWS Security Hub reducing the need to refer to different portals or different UIs. You can have AWS Security Hub act as a single common go-to dashboard."
"I rate Security Hub ten out of ten for stability."
"Within AWS Security Hub, there is a feature for aggregating and prioritizing security findings which allows for better risk prioritization based on misconfiguration, as they know AWS thoroughly."
"I really like the seamless integration with the AWS account structure. It can even be made mandatory as part of the landing zone. These are great features. And there's a single pane of glass for the entire account."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is easy to manage...It is a scalable solution."
"Finding out if your infrastructure is secure is a valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature of AWS Security Hub is the ability to track when monitoring is not enabled on any of my resources."
"Currently, our organization utilizes AWS for various purposes, including SaaS (Software as a Service), PaaS (Platform as a Service), and hosting applications in the cloud. We develop our applications and use AWS services as a platform for basic functions and secondary development needs. Additionally, we rely on PaaS for accounting services. Approximately, 50% of our applications are hosted in the cloud environment, making it a significant part of our current setup."
More AWS Security Hub pros
"Integrating the solution with our existing security tools and workflows was easy."
"The reporting services are great. With reporting services, if you have customers that just visit a URL you can see the result - including why it's blocked and how and how the URL was first recognized as malicious."
 

Cons

"Security Hub is currently not worth investing in, as it requires more configurations and integration with other services to work effectively."
"Although AWS Security Hub does a periodic scan of your overall infrastructure, it doesn't do it in real time."
"The solution should be easier to learn and use"
"The user interface, graphs, and dashboards of the solution could improve in the future. They are not very sophisticated and could use an update."
"Security Hub is currently not worth investing in, as it requires more configurations and integration with other services to work effectively."
"Security needs to be measured based on their own criteria. We can't add custom criteria specific to our organization. For example, having an S3 bucket publicly available might be flagged as a critical alert, but it might not be critical in a sandbox environment. So, it gets flagged as critical, which becomes a false positive. So, customization options and creating custom dashboards would be areas for improvement."
"The support must be quicker."
"The telemetry doesn't always go into the control center. When you have multiple instances running in AWS, you need a control tower to take feeds from Security Hub and analyze your results. Sometimes exemptions aren't passed between the control tower and Security Hub. The configuration gets mixed up or you don't get the desired results."
More AWS Security Hub cons
"The tool is not user-friendly."
"The solution should be simpler for the end-user in terms of reporting and navigating the product."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS Security Hub is not an expensive tool. I would consider it to be a cheap solution. AWS Security Hub follows the PAYG pricing model, meaning you will have to pay for whatever you use."
"The cost is based on the number of compliances, core checks, and services required, and for more than 10,000 recommendations, the charge is just one dollar."
"The price of the solution is not very competitive but it is reasonable."
"Security Hub is not an expensive solution."
"The pricing is fine. It is not an expensive tool."
"AWS Security Hub's pricing is pretty reasonable."
"There are multiple subscription models, like yearly, monthly, and packaged."
"The price of AWS Security Hub is average compared to other solutions."
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user186927 - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 16, 2015
Cybereason vs. Interset vs. SQRRL
Capture DB - they all use NoSQL db and hence solve the ad hoc query and 'go back in time' problem with current best of breed SIEM and DLP solutions that rely on real time analysis of incoming logs (and don't store them). This means deeper and quicker iterative threat analysis and assessment…
Read full review
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
6%
Financial Services Firm
24%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Educational Organization
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise12
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Azure Sentinel or AWS Security Hub?
We like that Azure Sentinel does not require as much maintenance as legacy SIEMs that are on-premises. Azure Sentinel is auto-scaling - you will not have to worry about performance impact, you will...
See all answers
What do you like most about AWS Security Hub?
The most valuable features of the solution are the scanning of all the cloud environments and most of the compliances available in the cloud.
See all answers
What needs improvement with AWS Security Hub?
Regarding how Amazon can improve AWS Security Hub, they have numerous services that are discriminated individually and grouped into packages. However, the sheer number of services can be overwhelmi...
See all answers
What do you like most about ThreatQ?
Integrating the solution with our existing security tools and workflows was easy.
See all answers
What needs improvement with ThreatQ?
The tool is not user-friendly. It is not beginner-friendly. It would be very difficult for a beginner to learn the tool. It will take at least two months to get familiar with it. Building the playb...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for ThreatQ?
We used the solution for threat mapping and managing IoCs.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Microsoft Sentinel vs AWS Security Hub Logo
Microsoft Sentinel vs AWS Security Hub
Compared 37% of the time
Wiz vs AWS Security Hub Logo
Wiz vs AWS Security Hub
Compared 11% of the time
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs AWS Security Hub Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs AWS Security Hub
Compared 7% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs AWS Security Hub Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs AWS Security Hub
Compared 5% of the time
Google Cloud Security Command Center vs AWS Security Hub Logo
Google Cloud Security Command Center vs AWS Security Hub
Compared 3% of the time
More AWS Security Hub Competitors
ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) vs ThreatQ Logo
ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) vs ThreatQ
Compared 44% of the time
Anomali vs ThreatQ Logo
Anomali vs ThreatQ
Compared 28% of the time
Recorded Future vs ThreatQ Logo
Recorded Future vs ThreatQ
Compared 14% of the time
Cyware Cyber Fusion vs ThreatQ Logo
Cyware Cyber Fusion vs ThreatQ
Compared 7% of the time
EclecticIQ vs ThreatQ Logo
EclecticIQ vs ThreatQ
Compared 6% of the time
More ThreatQ Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
AWS Security Hub
October 2025
AWS Security Hub reportDownload AWS Security Hub product report
Buyer's Guide
Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)
October 2025
ThreatQ reportDownload ThreatQ product report
 

Also Known As

SQRRL
No data available
 

Overview

AWS Security Hub is a comprehensive security service that provides a centralized view of security alerts and compliance status across an AWS environment. It collects data from various AWS services, partner solutions, and AWS Marketplace products to provide a holistic view of security posture. With Security Hub, users can quickly identify and prioritize security issues, automate compliance checks, and streamline remediation efforts. 

The service offers a range of features including continuous monitoring, threat intelligence integration, and customizable dashboards. It also provides automated insights and recommendations to help users improve their security posture. Security Hub integrates with other AWS services like Amazon GuardDuty, AWS Config, and AWS Macie to provide a unified security experience. Additionally, it supports integration with third-party security tools through its API, allowing users to leverage their existing security investments. 

With its user-friendly interface and powerful capabilities, AWS Security Hub is a valuable tool for organizations looking to enhance their security and compliance posture in the cloud.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

ThreatQ is a cybersecurity platform designed to enhance threat intelligence operations. It centralizes and manages threat data, allowing organizations to identify and respond to threats more efficiently.

ThreatQ is designed to empower security teams by personalizing threat intelligence and automation processes. It integrates with existing technologies, streamlining data collection and distribution. This promotes efficient detection, investigation, and response to security incidents, improving overall cybersecurity posture and resilience.

What are the key features of ThreatQ?
  • Data Aggregation: Centralizes threat data from multiple sources for easy access.
  • Customization: Tailors threat intelligence to suit specific security needs.
  • Automation: Streamlines repetitive security tasks to save time.
  • Integration: Seamlessly connects with existing security tools.
What benefits should users look for in reviews?
  • Improved Efficiency: Reduces time needed for threat investigation.
  • Enhanced Decision-Making: Provides actionable insights for security actions.
  • Cost Savings: Maximizes existing security resources and investments.
  • Scalability: Adapts as organizations grow and threats evolve.

ThreatQ is versatile in industries like finance and healthcare, where cybersecurity is crucial. It facilitates swift threat identification and risk management, essential for protecting sensitive data and complying with industry regulations. Its adaptability allows it to fit into diverse security architectures, making it a valuable asset across sectors.

ThreatQuotient
 

Sample Customers

Edmunds, Frame.io, GoDaddy, Realtor.com
Radar, Bitdefender, Crowdstrike, FireEye, IBM Security
Buyer's Guide
AWS Security Hub vs. ThreatQ
September 2025
Free Report: AWS Security Hub vs. ThreatQ
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Security Hub vs. ThreatQ and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our AWS Security Hub vs. ThreatQ report.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.