No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

AWS Secrets Manager vs Pulumi Enterprise comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS Secrets Manager
Ranking in Secrets Management Tools
3rd
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Password Managers (3rd)
Pulumi Enterprise
Ranking in Secrets Management Tools
7th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
AI Infrastructure (10th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Secrets Management Tools category, the mindshare of AWS Secrets Manager is 39.8%, up from 38.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pulumi Enterprise is 0.3%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Secrets Management Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
AWS Secrets Manager39.8%
Pulumi Enterprise0.3%
Other59.900000000000006%
Secrets Management Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Mahadev Metre - PeerSpot reviewer
DevOps Engineer at Paydoh
Consistent security and efficiency improvements optimize IT infrastructure with effective management
When creating AWS Secrets Manager, it should be automated using tools such as Terraform, Puppet, or Ansible. With Terraform code, you specify the encryption key, secret name, rotation policy, and secret replication. Human error occurs when feeding secret values manually, especially with large amounts of secrets to input. Secrets should never be protected only by IAM. They should be protected by multiple layers, such as IAM and one or two KMS keys. Additional security measures could be beneficial if necessary. The rotation policy is crucial because some secrets may become obsolete, require updates, or get compromised. With a weekly rotation policy, if unauthorized access occurs, the exposure is limited to seven days. The rotation policy can be customized according to needs.
Hammed Akinwale - PeerSpot reviewer
DevOps & Platform Engineer at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
Managing multi‑cloud infrastructure has become efficient while documentation and community still improve
Pulumi Enterprise could accept more automation, such as creating workflows or frameworks for platforms like YouTube and Spotify. Additionally, it should allow for creating resources on the cloud console with less friction. I would like the documentation feature to enable me to download the documents of my infrastructure from Pulumi Enterprise once it is written. I do not want to have to rewrite documentation after coding; once my infrastructure is written with Pulumi Enterprise, I should be able to get the documentation seamlessly. There should be more investment in building a stronger community around Pulumi Enterprise, as the Pulumi Enterprise community is not that strong compared to its capabilities.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I would recommend everyone to use AWS Secrets Manager for their security and for storing their passwords, because I see that passwords nowadays are easily compromised."
"The solution is very scalable."
"The API is fine and works well."
"It's highly scalable, so I'd rate it a ten out of ten."
"AWS Secrets Manager has impacted my organization positively through security improvements because on that basis, I can rotate my keys and passwords at a certain time."
"The most valuable feature is usability, as it is quite user-friendly."
"The most valuable feature of AWS Secrets Manager is its seamless integration with various AWS services."
"The most valuable feature is security."
"Pulumi Enterprise increases efficiency and reliability by providing seamless automation processes and tools while considering security and making secure infrastructure easy."
"Pulumi Enterprise positively impacts my organization as it enables us to manage stacks across different environments."
 

Cons

"An area for improvement in AWS Secrets Manager could be expanding integration options beyond AWS services."
"There is room for improvement in terms of integrating with certain other platforms."
"If you add one more layer of security to AWS Secrets Manager, even the programmer will not be able to see the secrets."
"There is a potential improvement in connecting AWS Secrets Manager to Jenkins CI/CD pipeline to automatically reflect changes in production."
"There is a need for better environmental implementation, such as having a security fund as a solution."
"The only concern with AWS Secrets Manager is its cost, which can be prohibitive for small organizations."
"AWS Secrets Manager could support hybrid infrastructure."
"We occasionally have problems with rate limits, although that is a problem more generally with AWS."
"I have not seen any specific outcome or benefit that I have measured so far, such as saving time, reducing errors, or helping my team in a measurable way."
"There should be more investment in building a stronger community around Pulumi Enterprise, as the Pulumi Enterprise community is not that strong compared to its capabilities."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive."
"We've observed that AWS Secrets Manager pricing is based on a per-secret-per-month model. As a result, we prefer to divide our secrets into individual pieces to increase security and grant specific access permissions to certain secrets, systems, or individuals. However, this approach results in higher costs. Therefore, we have been exploring ways to combine our secrets into groups to reduce expenses and simplify management. Nonetheless, we acknowledge that this issue may not be related to the secret manager's functionality."
"We purchase a monthly license for the product."
"I don't believe there is a license cost for the solution."
"The cost is somewhat high."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Secrets Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
902,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Large Enterprise10
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Azure Key Vault or AWS Secrets Manager?
Azure Key Vault is a SaaS solution. You can easily store passwords and secrets securely and encrypt them. Azure Key Vault is a great solution to ensure you are compliant with security and governanc...
Which is better - HashiCorp Vault or AWS Secrets Manager?
HashiCorp Vault was designed with your needs in mind. One of the features that makes this evident is its ability to work as both a cloud-agnostic and a multi-cloud solution. As a cloud-agnostic sol...
What needs improvement with AWS Secrets Manager?
AWS Secrets Manager could not be better because there has been no frustration with the product.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pulumi Enterprise?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Pulumi Enterprise is that these areas can be improved. The pricing can be made lower.
What needs improvement with Pulumi Enterprise?
In terms of how Pulumi Enterprise can be improved, I would say its documentation can be improved for entry-level users. More complete documentation would help new users get into the details and avo...
What is your primary use case for Pulumi Enterprise?
My main use case for Pulumi Enterprise is that our platform and DevOps engineering teams use it to support multiple application teams. A specific example of how our platform and DevOps teams use Pu...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Autodesk, Clevy, Stackery
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about HashiCorp, Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Secrets Management Tools. Updated: June 2026.
902,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.