AWS IAM Identity Center vs Microsoft Entra ID Governance comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft are both solutions in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.7, while Microsoft is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.5. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 1.5% mindshare in IAMS, compared to Microsoft’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

AWS IAM Identity Center

Read 11 AWS IAM Identity Center reviews

727 Views
371 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Read 12 Microsoft Entra ID Governance reviews

751 Views
713 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS IAM Identity Center

Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 2, 2024

AWS IAM Identity Center and Microsoft Entra ID Governance compete in the identity management and governance space. Microsoft Entra ID Governance appears to have the upper hand due to its extensive features for identity lifecycle management.

Features: AWS IAM Identity Center is notable for its seamless integration with AWS services and robust access control management, focusing on AWS-centric environments. It provides centrally created permission templates, which automate role creation and updates across AWS accounts to save time and reduce errors. Microsoft Entra ID Governance offers comprehensive features such as multi-factor authentication, access reviews and automated guest account management, excelling in identity governance with advanced analytics and monitoring tools.

Room for Improvement: AWS IAM Identity Center needs to enhance its user interface to simplify navigation and provide better documentation for more intricate IAM configurations. It would benefit from improved cross-service identity solutions beyond AWS environments. Meanwhile, Microsoft Entra ID Governance could improve its initial setup process to be more user-friendly, reduce the cost barrier for smaller enterprises, and enhance integration capabilities with non-Microsoft services to attract a broader range of users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Entra ID Governance offers a collaborative deployment process with strong support and is well-integrated with Microsoft services, making it appealing to businesses within the Microsoft ecosystem. AWS IAM Identity Center provides a streamlined deployment for AWS services, benefiting AWS-focused users but lacking extensive cross-platform support and service.

Pricing and ROI: AWS IAM Identity Center is generally more affordable, featuring a cost-effective identity management solution within AWS. In contrast, Microsoft Entra ID Governance has higher upfront costs but provides a more comprehensive feature set, offering a higher potential ROI for organizations seeking robust governance solutions across a wider identity management scope.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS IAM Identity Center vs. Microsoft Entra ID Governance Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS IAM Identity Center vs. Microsoft Entra ID Governance

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,202 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS IAM Identity Center

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

7th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (7th)

Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

10th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category, the mindshare of AWS IAM Identity Center is 1.5%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Entra ID Governance is 2.6%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
AWS IAM Identity Center	1.5%
Microsoft Entra ID Governance	2.6%
Other	95.9%

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

Featured Reviews

Khaled Saidi

DevOps Engineer | Cloud Architect & Automation Specialist | Kubernetes, Terraform, Ansible, AWS EKS at Phoenix Marketing & Advertising

Manage cloud security with granular access control and enhanced authentication

Managing IAM in complex environments can be challenging, and there are several areas for improvement. First, incorporating automation tools or a centralized dashboard for managing roles and policies across multiple accounts would simplify administration, especially for large organizations. Additionally, policy debugging and validation could be more streamlined, as troubleshooting misconfigurations can be time-consuming and prone to errors. A more robust error messaging system or a dedicated debugging tool would be beneficial. Another area for improvement is temporary access credentials. AWS documentation should offer more detailed guidance on edge cases and exceptions, along with clearer examples of how to handle various scenarios. Lastly, enhanced session-level policies that are more context-sensitive and based on specific conditions (such as IP address, device, or time) would greatly increase flexibility and allow for more granular control over user sessions.

Read full review

William Kox

Azure Architect at a comms service provider with 5,001-10,000 employees

Great policies and timelines for streamlined compliance

There are some areas where improvements are necessary. Even though we have almost the full package, there are some bugs. I cannot directly perform some tasks from the portal. First, I have to go to the policy, change it, and then return to the package to add it. I cannot do it directly from the package. Workarounds are needed, so that can be improved. At the moment, that is the only issue we are facing that needs enhancement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution helps us manage access in a time-efficient manner and offers reliable integration for our services, avoiding security breaches and maintaining operational efficiency."

"AWS IAM Identity Center offers a secure and centralized way to manage access and permissions."

"The organizational value of AWS IAM Identity Center is definitely significant, as it helps ensure that the least required permissions are given to users, thus preventing unnecessary access and reducing the risk of accidental deletions or changes."

"I highly recommend AWS IAM Identity Center to new users, especially for storage and deployment services like EC2, which are cost-efficient and scalable."

"The most valuable feature of AWS IAM Identity Center is the ability to provide a structured approach to access management through a single dashboard."

"The features of AWS IAM Identity Center that I appreciate are single sign-on and multi-factor authentication, and we can manage all authentication aspects while integrating it with third-party applications."

"Its valuable features include granular access control, allowing precise control over who can access specific AWS resources and under what conditions using JSON-based policies."

"IAM provides significant benefits when properly deployed."

More AWS IAM Identity Center pros

"I am very happy with the solution."

"The most valuable features are multifactor authentication and account creation for the Exchange environment in Office 365."

"The solution gives me the capability to automatically move guest accounts from the tenant without any manual intervention."

"Regarding Microsoft Entra ID Governance integration with Microsoft services, there is automated identity lifecycle management in the product."

"It is compliant with our RVRT and CSV guidelines."

"The solution is fully scalable, supporting everything from small companies to large enterprises."

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Entra ID Governance for identity management is multi-factor authentication."

"The product's most valuable features are the robust audit trail capabilities."

More Microsoft Entra ID Governance pros

Cons

"The AWS Identity Center's user interface could be improved to provide a clearer understanding of how the system operates."

"In the product, two groups cannot have the same name...In general, the tool does not allow for the duplication of names."

"Integrating AWS IAM Identity Center with other applications sometimes presents challenges."

"The configuration with other tools can be hard."

"I would like to see more flexibility in the features as sometimes it doesn't meet my expectations."

"There is a desire to see integration or adoption of time-based user creation features within AWS IAM Identity Center."

"Focusing on further allowing customization and flexibility in developing solutions as a solution architect or developer would enhance user experience."

"For AWS services in general, I had trouble creating an S3 bucket due to a repetitive error message regarding existing names."

More AWS IAM Identity Center cons

"There are some areas where improvements are necessary. Even though we have almost the full package, there are some bugs."

"The solution lacks the feature to work well with third-party applications."

"Microsoft has done a commendable job with RPAX. However, Microsoft should prioritize enhancing its ABAC (Attribute-Based Access Control) capabilities. Currently, Microsoft's ABAC offering falls behind AWS in comparison."

"Sometimes, the solution is not super reliable."

"One area for improvement in Microsoft Entra ID Governance could be providing more granular control over security policies."

"Even though we have almost the full package, there are some bugs."

"The platform's configuration process needs improvement."

"The product's workflow approval process needs improvement."

More Microsoft Entra ID Governance cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is cheap since it is available on the cloud."

"There are no additional costs besides the standard licensing fees."

"The solution's pricing is not low but reasonable."

"In the education sector where I work, the annual cost for my Google and Microsoft environments is approximately $35,000. This covers the needs of 3,400 students and 800 faculty and staff members."

"While other products give the pricing for their application, Microsoft Entra ID Governance has a per-user-based license model."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Performing Arts

Computer Software Company

18%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS IAM Identity Center?

The product is easy for beginners to learn and use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS IAM Identity Center?

AWS provides the lowest pricing among other service providers like Azure, Google, Oracle. It is cost-effective, and they use a pay-as-you-go model.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS IAM Identity Center?

The tech support for AWS is time-consuming, as we have experienced this issue. However, I am not aware of many other cases.

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Entra ID Governance?

The most valuable feature of Microsoft Entra ID Governance is access reviews.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Entra ID Governance?

In terms of integration, improvements could be made. To enhance integration, they could provide out-of-box integration with HashiCorp. This out-of-box integration with HashiCorp or another product ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Entra ID Governance?

Clients may use Microsoft Entra ID Governance for various identity management tasks.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs AWS IAM Identity Center

Compared 40% of the time

Microsoft Active Directory vs AWS IAM Identity Center

Compared 13% of the time

Red Hat Single Sign On vs AWS IAM Identity Center

Compared 12% of the time

Auth0 vs AWS IAM Identity Center

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Entra External ID vs AWS IAM Identity Center

Compared 9% of the time

More AWS IAM Identity Center Competitors

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Compared 69% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Compared 24% of the time

Netwrix Auditor vs Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Compared 7% of the time

More Microsoft Entra ID Governance Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS IAM Identity Center

October 2025

Download AWS IAM Identity Center product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID Governance

September 2025

Download Microsoft Entra ID Governance product report

Also Known As

AWS Single Sign On, AWS SSO

No data available

Overview

AWS IAM Identity Center is the recommended service for managing your workforce's access to AWS applications or your multiple AWS accounts (or both). It is a flexible solution that can be used to connect your existing identity source or help you create users in AWS. IAM Identity Center can be used alongside your existing AWS account access configurations.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Microsoft Entra ID Governance empowers organizations with advanced identity management, security enforcement, and seamless access management across environments, offering robust multi-factor authentication and audit capabilities.

Microsoft Entra ID Governance provides comprehensive identity and security management through features like single sign-on and privileged identity management. It enhances user management with user behavior analytics, entitlement management, and access reviews while integrating on-premises solutions with cloud services like Office 365. By ensuring secure access and resource protection within Azure, organizations manage access, automate user access rules, and govern external identities effectively.

What features make Microsoft Entra ID Governance stand out?

Audit Trail Capabilities: Thorough tracking for security compliance.
Multi-Factor Authentication: Enhanced protection across platforms.
Single Sign-On: Efficient management across different systems.
Privileged Identity Management: Control just-in-time access with analytics.
Entitlement Management: Automate guest account management.

What benefits should users look for in reviews of Microsoft Entra ID Governance?

Enhanced Security: Strong authentication and auditing for secure environments.
Efficient User Management: Streamlined access processes through SSO.
Unified Identity Solutions: Integration with cloud and on-premises platforms.
Automated Access Rules: Reduced manual oversight with automation.

Financial services utilize Microsoft Entra ID Governance to protect sensitive data while automating user access rules and managing compliance. In education, it facilitates user account management and access provisioning for students and faculty, ensuring secure collaboration through Exchange and Teams.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

AWS IAM Identity Center vs. Microsoft Entra ID Governance

September 2025

Free Report: AWS IAM Identity Center vs. Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS IAM Identity Center vs. Microsoft Entra ID Governance and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS IAM Identity Center vs. Microsoft Entra ID Governance report.

See our list of best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.