AWS IAM Identity Center vs Microsoft Entra ID Governance comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft are both solutions in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.7, while Microsoft is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.5. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 1.4% mindshare in IAMS, compared to Microsoft’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

AWS IAM Identity Center

Read 11 AWS IAM Identity Center reviews

628 Views
339 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Read 10 Microsoft Entra ID Governance reviews

674 Views
640 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS IAM Identity Center

Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 2, 2024

AWS IAM Identity Center and Microsoft Entra ID Governance compete in the identity management and governance space. Microsoft Entra ID Governance appears to have the upper hand due to its extensive features for identity lifecycle management.

Features: AWS IAM Identity Center is notable for its seamless integration with AWS services and robust access control management, focusing on AWS-centric environments. It provides centrally created permission templates, which automate role creation and updates across AWS accounts to save time and reduce errors. Microsoft Entra ID Governance offers comprehensive features such as multi-factor authentication, access reviews and automated guest account management, excelling in identity governance with advanced analytics and monitoring tools.

Room for Improvement: AWS IAM Identity Center needs to enhance its user interface to simplify navigation and provide better documentation for more intricate IAM configurations. It would benefit from improved cross-service identity solutions beyond AWS environments. Meanwhile, Microsoft Entra ID Governance could improve its initial setup process to be more user-friendly, reduce the cost barrier for smaller enterprises, and enhance integration capabilities with non-Microsoft services to attract a broader range of users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Entra ID Governance offers a collaborative deployment process with strong support and is well-integrated with Microsoft services, making it appealing to businesses within the Microsoft ecosystem. AWS IAM Identity Center provides a streamlined deployment for AWS services, benefiting AWS-focused users but lacking extensive cross-platform support and service.

Pricing and ROI: AWS IAM Identity Center is generally more affordable, featuring a cost-effective identity management solution within AWS. In contrast, Microsoft Entra ID Governance has higher upfront costs but provides a more comprehensive feature set, offering a higher potential ROI for organizations seeking robust governance solutions across a wider identity management scope.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS IAM Identity Center vs. Microsoft Entra ID Governance Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS IAM Identity Center vs. Microsoft Entra ID Governance

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS IAM Identity Center

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

7th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (8th)

Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

12th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category, the mindshare of AWS IAM Identity Center is 1.4%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Entra ID Governance is 2.3%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

Featured Reviews

Khaled Saidi

DevOps Engineer | Cloud Architect & Automation Specialist | Kubernetes, Terraform, Ansible, AWS EKS at Phoenix Marketing & Advertising

Manage cloud security with granular access control and enhanced authentication

Managing IAM in complex environments can be challenging, and there are several areas for improvement. First, incorporating automation tools or a centralized dashboard for managing roles and policies across multiple accounts would simplify administration, especially for large organizations. Additionally, policy debugging and validation could be more streamlined, as troubleshooting misconfigurations can be time-consuming and prone to errors. A more robust error messaging system or a dedicated debugging tool would be beneficial. Another area for improvement is temporary access credentials. AWS documentation should offer more detailed guidance on edge cases and exceptions, along with clearer examples of how to handle various scenarios. Lastly, enhanced session-level policies that are more context-sensitive and based on specific conditions (such as IP address, device, or time) would greatly increase flexibility and allow for more granular control over user sessions.

Read full review

William Kox

Azure Architect at a comms service provider with 5,001-10,000 employees

Great policies and timelines for streamlined compliance

There are some areas where improvements are necessary. Even though we have almost the full package, there are some bugs. I cannot directly perform some tasks from the portal. First, I have to go to the policy, change it, and then return to the package to add it. I cannot do it directly from the package. Workarounds are needed, so that can be improved. At the moment, that is the only issue we are facing that needs enhancement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution helps us manage access in a time-efficient manner and offers reliable integration for our services, avoiding security breaches and maintaining operational efficiency."

"The most valuable feature is the security configuration ease, which is great for me, especially as a beginner."

"The most valuable feature of AWS IAM Identity Center is the ability to provide a structured approach to access management through a single dashboard."

"The organizational value of AWS IAM Identity Center is definitely significant, as it helps ensure that the least required permissions are given to users, thus preventing unnecessary access and reducing the risk of accidental deletions or changes."

"AWS IAM Identity Center offers a secure and centralized way to manage access and permissions."

"The two most valuable features of IAM Identity Center are the security policy generation and automation in creating credentials."

"The most valuable feature of AWS Identity Center is its ability to centrally create permission templates, known as permission sets, which define AWS IAM roles."

"Overall, IAM Identity Center is a great service, currently rated at nine out of ten."

More AWS IAM Identity Center pros

"Access reviews are an essential feature of Entra Governance. Additionally, privileged identity management is one of its most valuable features. Just-in-time access, or Jet GIT, is integral to this system. Moreover, user behavior analytics stands out as one of its top features."

"It is compliant with our RVRT and CSV guidelines."

"I am very happy with the solution."

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Entra ID Governance is access reviews."

"The solution is fully scalable, supporting everything from small companies to large enterprises."

"The most valuable features are multifactor authentication and account creation for the Exchange environment in Office 365."

"The product's most valuable features are the robust audit trail capabilities."

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Entra ID Governance for identity management is multi-factor authentication."

More Microsoft Entra ID Governance pros

Cons

"The configuration with other tools can be hard."

"Integrating AWS IAM Identity Center with other applications sometimes presents challenges."

"I have opened support tickets and received responses, although not always resolving my queries fully. I would appreciate a live chat option with technical support for quicker resolutions."

"Focusing on further allowing customization and flexibility in developing solutions as a solution architect or developer would enhance user experience."

"For AWS services in general, I had trouble creating an S3 bucket due to a repetitive error message regarding existing names."

"I would like to see more flexibility in the features as sometimes it doesn't meet my expectations."

"There is a desire to see integration or adoption of time-based user creation features within AWS IAM Identity Center."

"I would like to see more flexibility in the features as sometimes it doesn't meet my expectations."

More AWS IAM Identity Center cons

"Microsoft has done a commendable job with RPAX. However, Microsoft should prioritize enhancing its ABAC (Attribute-Based Access Control) capabilities. Currently, Microsoft's ABAC offering falls behind AWS in comparison."

"There are some areas where improvements are necessary. Even though we have almost the full package, there are some bugs."

"One area for improvement in Microsoft Entra ID Governance could be providing more granular control over security policies."

"Microsoft Entra ID Governance should improve its capability to manage identities and access from a single console."

"If you want to conduct access review of database-based applications, then you cannot do that."

"The product's workflow approval process needs improvement."

"The solution lacks the feature to work well with third-party applications."

"If you want to conduct access review of database-based applications, then you cannot do that."

More Microsoft Entra ID Governance cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is cheap since it is available on the cloud."

"There are no additional costs besides the standard licensing fees."

"While other products give the pricing for their application, Microsoft Entra ID Governance has a per-user-based license model."

"In the education sector where I work, the annual cost for my Google and Microsoft environments is approximately $35,000. This covers the needs of 3,400 students and 800 faculty and staff members."

"The solution's pricing is not low but reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Performing Arts

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS IAM Identity Center?

The product is easy for beginners to learn and use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS IAM Identity Center?

AWS provides the lowest pricing among other service providers like Azure, Google, Oracle. It is cost-effective, and they use a pay-as-you-go model.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS IAM Identity Center?

The tech support for AWS is time-consuming, as we have experienced this issue. However, I am not aware of many other cases.

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Entra ID Governance?

The most valuable feature of Microsoft Entra ID Governance is access reviews.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Entra ID Governance?

Microsoft Entra ID Governance ( /categories/grc ) is relatively new, and some features require more development. For example, when creating user access review campaigns, we can't specify the time t...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Entra ID Governance?

I am using Microsoft Entra ID Governance ( /products/microsoft-entra-id-governance-reviews ) to integrate with our system. We control the joiner, mover, and leaver processes to enable auto provisio...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs AWS IAM Identity Center

Compared 49% of the time

Microsoft Active Directory vs AWS IAM Identity Center

Compared 13% of the time

Red Hat Single Sign On vs AWS IAM Identity Center

Compared 12% of the time

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs AWS IAM Identity Center

Compared 11% of the time

Auth0 vs AWS IAM Identity Center

Compared 8% of the time

More AWS IAM Identity Center Competitors

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Compared 65% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Compared 22% of the time

Netwrix Auditor vs Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Compared 8% of the time

Tenable Cloud Security vs Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Entra ID Governance Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS IAM Identity Center

August 2025

Download AWS IAM Identity Center product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID Governance

August 2025

Download Microsoft Entra ID Governance product report

Also Known As

AWS Single Sign On, AWS SSO

No data available

Overview

AWS IAM Identity Center is the recommended service for managing your workforce's access to AWS applications or your multiple AWS accounts (or both). It is a flexible solution that can be used to connect your existing identity source or help you create users in AWS. IAM Identity Center can be used alongside your existing AWS account access configurations.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Microsoft Entra ID Governance empowers organizations with advanced identity management, security enforcement, and seamless access management across environments, offering robust multi-factor authentication and audit capabilities.

Microsoft Entra ID Governance provides comprehensive identity and security management through features like single sign-on and privileged identity management. It enhances user management with user behavior analytics, entitlement management, and access reviews while integrating on-premises solutions with cloud services like Office 365. By ensuring secure access and resource protection within Azure, organizations manage access, automate user access rules, and govern external identities effectively.

What features make Microsoft Entra ID Governance stand out?

Audit Trail Capabilities: Thorough tracking for security compliance.
Multi-Factor Authentication: Enhanced protection across platforms.
Single Sign-On: Efficient management across different systems.
Privileged Identity Management: Control just-in-time access with analytics.
Entitlement Management: Automate guest account management.

What benefits should users look for in reviews of Microsoft Entra ID Governance?

Enhanced Security: Strong authentication and auditing for secure environments.
Efficient User Management: Streamlined access processes through SSO.
Unified Identity Solutions: Integration with cloud and on-premises platforms.
Automated Access Rules: Reduced manual oversight with automation.

Financial services utilize Microsoft Entra ID Governance to protect sensitive data while automating user access rules and managing compliance. In education, it facilitates user account management and access provisioning for students and faculty, ensuring secure collaboration through Exchange and Teams.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

AWS IAM Identity Center vs. Microsoft Entra ID Governance

July 2025

Free Report: AWS IAM Identity Center vs. Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS IAM Identity Center vs. Microsoft Entra ID Governance and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS IAM Identity Center vs. Microsoft Entra ID Governance report.

See our list of best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.