

IDERA SQL Safe Backup and AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery are two prominent solutions in the field of data recovery and backup. Users are more satisfied with IDERA SQL Safe Backup due to its ease of deployment and customer service, while AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is preferred for its advanced features and higher ROI despite the cost.
Features: IDERA SQL Safe Backup users highlight comprehensive reporting, ease of use, and reliable support. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery users value scalability, seamless integration with other AWS services, and its wide range of features catering to enterprise needs.
Room for Improvement: IDERA SQL Safe Backup users request enhancements in performance speed, expanded cloud support, and a more intuitive interface. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery users seek better multi-cloud support, more detailed documentation, and easier setup processes. AWS shows a stronger focus on broadening ecosystem integration.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IDERA SQL Safe Backup is praised for its straightforward installation and responsive support team. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery's deployment is more complex but benefits from extensive online resources and AWS support. IDERA is noted for easier deployment, whereas AWS provides more comprehensive support tools.
Pricing and ROI: IDERA SQL Safe Backup is seen as cost-effective with a quick ROI. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery, while more expensive, offers a higher ROI due to its extensive features and reliability. Users feel AWS’s advanced capabilities justify the higher expense.
However, with AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Service being a native service, integration is seamless, highlighting the return on investment.
The recovery process requires fewer people and much less time, which has saved my organization engineering effort and operational time.
We no longer have to schedule employees on weekends since the system automatically triggers alerts, allowing engineers to respond as needed.
In case of any issue, they are ready to provide support within the defined SLA timeline.
Helping us in troubleshooting each and every step if we face any issues.
Higher tiers offer faster response time and more direct technical help.
We can expand it to multiple data centers or different areas such as EMEA and APAC.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is scalable because it can protect and replicate multiple servers and workloads, and it runs on AWS infrastructure.
The scalability is quite good and we were able to scale this service to many of the services that our company uses.
It is very good and very reliable.
AWS is not difficult, but the cost associated with replicating data to another region can be significant.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is stable.
Our RPO improved from approximately three to four hours to less than one minute.
This would detail user activity directly in the ACL console for easier debugging and auditing.
It would be beneficial to get some insights when a disaster happens, including identification and probable solutions to ensure effective recovery.
In my case, since the cloud is basically a pay-as-you-go model, we only pay for the replication storage, data transfer, and small staging instances.
Continuous replication minimizes data loss and the cost-efficient staging environment helps reduce infrastructure expenses compared to maintaining a full secondary disaster recovery site.
There is definitely a scope of improvement, and for year-end licensing, they should definitely improve the cost.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery supports a wide range of source environments, including VMware, Hyper-V, physical servers, and other cloud providers, making it versatile for different IT infrastructures.
The low RPO at a seconds-level replication and a fast recovery with a low RTO provide the most cost-effective way, paying mostly for storage until failover.
Overall, the best combination of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is its near real-time replication and quick recovery testing, and this makes the service very useful in real-world scenarios.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery | 0.8% |
| IDERA SQL Safe Backup | 0.6% |
| Other | 98.6% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
CloudEndure Disaster Recovery enables real-time replication and rapid recovery to enhance organizational resilience. Key features include block-level data replication, ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and automated recovery orchestration. Users benefit from increased efficiency, improved workflows, and enhanced data management, significantly improving organizational performance and business continuity.
SQL Safe Backup helps database administrators to back up and recover instantly across SQL Servers. Unlike its competition, it provides virtual databases with access to back up files without consuming disk space, instant restore, centralized management across SQL Servers, and alert notifications for success and failure of operations.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.