We performed a comparison between AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and Backup and Restore for SharePoint & Microsoft Office 365 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software."It's on the cheaper side and not too expensive for users."
"CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is a fairly stable solution."
"We have never had any issues with scalability."
"Technical support has been very good. They usually respond quickly to our requests."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward, it's not complex."
"The initial setup is really straightforward."
"The setup is pretty straightforward."
"The most valuable aspect of CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is its instant block replication feature. This allows us to perform live block verification and eliminates the need to concern ourselves with recovery point objectives. This capability is particularly advantageous for critical workloads."
"The stability has always been very good."
"Backup and Restore for SharePoint & Microsoft Office 365 is easy to use."
"The most valuable feature includes leaving the stub files behind and integrating that with the recenter feature."
"The solution has good scalability."
More Backup and Restore for SharePoint & Microsoft Office 365 Pros →
"The UI could be a little sleeker."
"Sometimes a server will get a bit behind. "
"I have not seen any areas that need improvement at this time."
"Definitely there should be better logging. From a customer perspective I would like to see more logs on what is happening. If there is an issue, I would like to know what the problem is. Right now, we have to depend on the support of the vendor to check and let us know, because we don't have access to a lot of logging information."
"I would like to see better support for creating and working with archives."
"I set up a test, deleted the source, and went to fail it back, and it didn't work."
"The only thing I would like to see is, they don't have a formal ticketing system. There is no way I can go back and see what questions we had six months back, what issues we had, and how they were resolved."
"The solution's network setup and a lot of the control tower setup could be improved."
"The user experience needs a little refreshing touch."
"The solution's updates and rollouts of the patches cause a lot of problems."
"We need more options for the backup schedule."
"I think the solution itself keeps up with everything else. Sometimes it would be nice if they could move a little bit quicker and have faster updates, but in terms of the features, it's absolutely fine and adequate."
More Backup and Restore for SharePoint & Microsoft Office 365 Cons →
More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Backup and Restore for SharePoint & Microsoft Office 365 Pricing and Cost Advice →
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is ranked 15th in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 11 reviews while Backup and Restore for SharePoint & Microsoft Office 365 is ranked 13th in SaaS Backup with 4 reviews. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is rated 7.4, while Backup and Restore for SharePoint & Microsoft Office 365 is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery writes "Free, easy to use, and offers good support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Backup and Restore for SharePoint & Microsoft Office 365 writes "Allows for storage optimization and archiving functionality of DocAve Backup is valuable for organizations with large amounts of data". AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is most compared with Azure Site Recovery, AWS Backup, Oracle Data Guard, VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery and Zerto, whereas Backup and Restore for SharePoint & Microsoft Office 365 is most compared with Code42 Incydr, IBM Spectrum Protect Plus, Veeam Backup & Replication and Commvault Cloud.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.