AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and IBM are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.8, while IBM is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.5. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 0.9% mindshare in PSP, compared to IBM’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of IBM users who would recommend it.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Read 11 AWS Elastic Beanstalk reviews

590 Views
590 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Read 8 Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud reviews

586 Views
586 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud and AWS Elastic Beanstalk are cloud platforms in the infrastructure deployment and application management category. AWS Elastic Beanstalk seems to have an upper hand due to its robust features and scalability, although OpenShift on IBM Cloud is recognized for its pricing and customer support.

Features: Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud provides a powerful Kubernetes environment, integrated DevOps tools, and enhanced security measures, suitable for enterprise applications. AWS Elastic Beanstalk stands out for automatic scaling, ease of environment management, and integration with AWS services, offering robust scalability and service integration for AWS-focused users.

Room for Improvement: Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud could improve in aspect of service documentation, optimization of resource allocation, and simplifying the user interface for novice users. AWS Elastic Beanstalk could enhance customer service personalization, price transparency, and support for non-AWS integrations to broaden its appeal outside the AWS ecosystem.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud offers automated deployment options and responsive customer service, beneficial for users seeking guided assistance. AWS Elastic Beanstalk delivers straightforward deployment and intuitive management, though its customer service may lack personal touch.

Pricing and ROI: Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud provides competitive pricing and ROI with cost-effective support. AWS Elastic Beanstalk's initial setup is costlier but promises substantial long-term ROI through feature offerings and scalability, suiting those leveraging AWS services extensively.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

10th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

15th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of AWS Elastic Beanstalk is 0.9%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
AWS Elastic Beanstalk	0.9%
Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud	0.9%
Other	98.2%

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

Harendra Sisodia

Business Analyst & Agile Strategist at Charles Schwab

Utilize auto-scaling and monitoring to efficiently manage application infrastructure

The key features of AWS Elastic Beanstalk include auto-scaling capabilities for applications experiencing traffic fluctuations, ensuring high availability and cost-effectiveness. AWS Elastic Beanstalk integrates with AWS CloudWatch to provide metrics like latency and CPU utilization, allowing easy monitoring of application performance. It supports multiple programming languages and frameworks, supports multi-environment for different stages of the application lifecycle, and is cost-effective as you pay based on the resources launched.

Read full review

Adrian Bilauca

Chief Software Engineer at Totalsoft

Handles security setups independently for a more secure environment

OpenShift does have more secure features. Azure also has equivalent services. For my client, it was good enough to switch to Azure. For development, there wasn't any significant change in effort, however, for the DevOps team, it was a relief since Azure has managed services. We used elasticity and scalability all over.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Elastic Beanstalk is helpful and easy to manage services, even when dealing with multiple clients."

"I would rate the overall solution a ten out of ten."

"The simplicity in the speed of provisioning users is what I like best about Elastic Beanstalk."

"Elastic Beanstalk simplifies deploying and managing applications."

"Elastic Beanstalk is very easy to use, providing infrastructure to deploy our third-party application to the cloud within 15 to 20 minutes."

"The management of environments is a valuable feature."

"I find the versioning to be especially valuable on AWS Elastic Beanstalk."

"Elastic Beanstalk is helpful and easy to manage services, even when dealing with multiple clients."

More AWS Elastic Beanstalk pros

"Our pipeline integrates various monitoring tools like Fortify for security checks. Once the pipeline processes the code, the finished product is deployed on Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud. We ensure application setup and recovery by utilizing two separate clusters on OpenShift."

"For the DevOps team, it was a relief since Azure has managed services."

"I've used the elasticity and scalability all over."

"The solution offers the most robust Kubernetes orchestration available."

"The initial setup is easy."

"The most valuable feature of Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is the UI console. We are able to receive the resources from the console directly."

"The deployment mechanism has become more dynamic with the use of the product."

"In general, customers appreciate its ability to run different workloads, manage applications through CI/CD pipelines like Jenkins, and leverage tools like Helm charts and Kako."

More Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud pros

Cons

"One area where AWS Elastic Beanstalk struggles is with the complexity of deployments. As deployments become more complex, technical constraints can become a burden."

"Sometimes there are issues when auto-scaling with CloudFront."

"Maybe the company could create more option packages, such as more bundles of configuration."

"The documentation needs to be clearer, particularly relating to editing JSON files before uploading applications."

"Elastic Beanstalk can enhance its customizability further, especially in terms of deployment options."

"There are areas for improvement in Elastic Beanstalk, especially in the management part. Tasks like creating load balancers and retiring versions require manual code updates, and URL changes can be time-consuming."

"From what I've observed, it seems AWS has ceased further development on Elastic Beanstalk."

"Sometimes it is difficult to use for the first time. The automatic scaling functionality could use improvement."

More AWS Elastic Beanstalk cons

"The effectiveness is satisfactory, and there haven't been any additional fees due to meeting demands. However, there's room for improvement in pricing, performance, and stability. Regarding the UI, it could be more user-friendly and integrated with various platforms. Currently, the UI lacks user-friendliness, especially for developers unfamiliar with container technology. Expecting them to create YAML files for security purposes is unrealistic without proper guidance or experience. This aspect needs improvement."

"The general purpose solution tries to cater to too many customers so it is heavy."

"Making it even more cost-effective could be explored."

"The installation and configuration procedure should be simplified."

"The service mesh integrations could improve the solution."

"Technical support could be a bit better."

"There is room for improvement in cluster-based queue monitoring and autoscaling."

"Many of the managed services are not accessible."

More Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The pricing is a little high in China."

"This product is not costly when compared to other vendors."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Educational Organization

13%

Outsourcing Company

11%

University

11%

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Elastic Beanstalk?

AWS Elastic Beanstalk itself is free to use, but there are charges for other integrated services like RDS ( /products/amazon-rds-reviews ), ELBs, and EC2s. If only AWS Elastic Beanstalk is used, th...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Elastic Beanstalk?

Elastic Beanstalk can enhance its customizability further, especially in terms of deployment options.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS Elastic Beanstalk?

I have used AWS Elastic Beanstalk ( /products/aws-elastic-beanstalk-reviews ) primarily to manage infrastructure. The main purpose is to offload the complexity of managing servers, operating system...

See all answers

What do you like most about Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?

Our pipeline integrates various monitoring tools like Fortify for security checks. Once the pipeline processes the code, the finished product is deployed on Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud. We ensu...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?

From a cost perspective, some cost-effective situations were more difficult to achieve in Azure than in OpenShift. Comparing them can be difficult since the financial services cloud had stripped ma...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?

There is more work and effort needed for when many of the managed services are not accessible, especially in the security area. You have to do your own security setups as opposed to using a managed...

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon Lightsail vs AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Compared 26% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Compared 25% of the time

Heroku vs AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Compared 21% of the time

Google App Engine vs AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Compared 16% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Compared 13% of the time

More AWS Elastic Beanstalk Competitors

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Compared 26% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Compared 18% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Compared 15% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Compared 10% of the time

More Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

PaaS Clouds

January 2026

Download AWS Elastic Beanstalk product report

Buyer's Guide

PaaS Clouds

January 2026

Download Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud product report

Overview

AWS Elastic Beanstalk streamlines deploying and managing web applications, providing efficient session management, direct log access, and seamless rollback during deployment for uninterrupted operations.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk is designed for developers seeking ease of use in provisioning and deployment without any application downtime. With auto-scaling capabilities that enhance application performance, users can deploy directly on EC2 or Dockerized environments. While it supports a range of application frameworks, improvements in integration with CloudFront, auto-scaling against AI-based attacks, and simplified HTTPS integrations are suggested by users. Additionally, expanding Docker support and enhancing documentation can address user challenges, offering a more comprehensive experience.

What features make AWS Elastic Beanstalk efficient?

Direct Log Access: Easily retrieve logs through the console for efficient monitoring.
Session Management: Manages sessions between Elastic Beanstalk and RDS smoothly.
Auto-Scaling: Enhances performance by adjusting resources automatically.
Versioning: Allows application changes without downtime, boosting flexibility.

What benefits do users find in AWS Elastic Beanstalk?

Continuous Operation: Seamless rollbacks ensure website functionality during deployments.
Ease of Use: Simplifies the provisioning of applications and environmental configurations.
Flexibility: Offers versatile framework support, catering to different application needs.
Integration: Facilitates integration with services like S3 and LoadBalancer for efficient management.

Organizations adopt AWS Elastic Beanstalk for deploying web applications such as Django, Laravel, native PHP, and .NET Core. They leverage its management capabilities for environmental configurations like Python virtual environments and PHP-FPM. It's a practical tool for educators and businesses managing client migrations, utilizing its seamless integration with AWS services.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud™ is a fully managed OpenShift service that leverages the enterprise scale and security of IBM Cloud, so you can focus on developing and managing your applications.

Deploy highly available, OpenShift clusters as-a-service with the click of a button on IBM Cloud. Move and build OpenShift-based workloads on a managed public cloud service to gain increased responsiveness, scalability, and reliability.

IBM

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

edenor, Ford

Buyer's Guide

AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

December 2025

Free Report: AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.