AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs Google Cloud comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Google are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.8, while Google is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.6. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 1.1% mindshare in PSP, compared to Google’s 5.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Google users who would recommend it.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Read 12 AWS Elastic Beanstalk reviews

1,603 Views
1,603 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Google Cloud

Read 81 Google Cloud reviews

15,948 Views
7,655 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Google Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Google Cloud and AWS Elastic Beanstalk compete in the cloud computing category. Google Cloud seems to have an edge in terms of features and scalability, whereas AWS Elastic Beanstalk is appreciated for its deployment simplicity and version management.

Features: Google Cloud offers affordability, ease of use, real-time database updates, simplified setup, and auto-scale capabilities without the need for infrastructure management. AWS Elastic Beanstalk excels in automatic server scaling, ease of deployment, version management, seamless rollbacks, providing flexibility and smooth updates.

Room for Improvement: Google Cloud could improve integration with other platforms, enhance analytics visibility, and offer more comprehensive support services. There are noted issues with database management, migration tools, and cost reductions. AWS Elastic Beanstalk faces concerns about AWS's reduced focus on it, incomplete features, and cost for AI-based auto-scaling. Improvement in documentation and integrated HTTPS would be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Cloud supports both public and hybrid cloud deployments, providing more flexibility than AWS Elastic Beanstalk, which is limited to public clouds. Although Google Cloud's deployment processes are well-received, support can be slow and costly. AWS Elastic Beanstalk is easy to deploy, but technical support and low prioritization by AWS are concerns.

Pricing and ROI: Google Cloud presents competitive pricing with flexible pay-as-you-go models, providing good value despite unexpected expenses. AWS Elastic Beanstalk itself is free to use, with costs arising from associated resources like EC2 instances. AWS pricing is seen as reasonable but potentially high with support fees. Both platforms offer ROI through cost savings and efficiency improvements, though cost transparency and support pricing remain areas of concern for users.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Google Cloud Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Google Cloud

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

7th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Google Cloud

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of AWS Elastic Beanstalk is 1.1%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Google Cloud is 5.8%, up from 5.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Google Cloud	5.8%
AWS Elastic Beanstalk	1.1%
Other	93.1%

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

Kunal Das

Test Engineer at Happiest Minds Technology Limited

Quick automation has simplified my app deployments and has let me focus on data engineering

The overall experience with AWS Elastic Beanstalk was excellent. The performance made deploying and managing my application very easy, and it was really smooth and efficient. The automatic scaling can be improved so it can handle traffic changes more smoothly. I have given a rating of nine out of ten because auto scaling works reliably and it handles traffic spikes well with minimal manual effort needed. There is a balance between simplicity and control. I have not given a ten out of ten because sometimes the scaling decision can feel slightly delayed depending on the metrics. AWS Elastic Beanstalk is powerful, but not as advantageous or granular as ECS or EKS auto-scaling. Customization is good but not fully flexible for complex architectures.

Read full review

AnjaneyaVara Prasad

Solution Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Cloud services have reduced on‑prem hardware costs and now support flexible microservices workloads

Regarding potential areas of improvement for Google Cloud, considering that they are providing 300 plus services, some services could be improved. For example, if I am facing some network troubleshooting issue in GKE in Google Cloud, I have to dig deeply and enable some special logs, such as flow logs. To enable that, it is chargeable. At least for basic services, they should give end-to-end support. In terms of end-to-end support, if I am purchasing one firewall from Google and using that firewall, all firewall-related services should be free. If I want to troubleshoot something deep and perform deep troubleshooting, you have to enable some additional logs. That is not that good. If I have to enable additional logs and want to store them into Google Cloud storage, which is similar to an S3 bucket, it is again chargeable. Those kinds of things should be given as part of the package. If you take firewall, all firewall-related logs, activities, and diagnostics everything should come as one package. If you want to do some deep analysis, you have to enable these logs, and for that you have to store them in the cloud storage, which is again chargeable. We should not have those kinds of things.Regarding additional costs, it can vary case by case. If I want to do deep analysis, I have to enable some logs, and for those logs, Google is charging. I am already paying for my virtual firewall from Google, and I am paying the cost for that. If I want to do some further troubleshooting and enable some low-level logs, they are charging for that. So these are the kinds of things I am talking about. To do very deep-level troubleshooting and enable additional logs, they will be charging. Not only Google, but all clouds are charging for this. Functionality-wise, Google Cloud is fine. In terms of virtual machine deployment or VM instance, the functionality is good.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The simplicity in the speed of provisioning users is what I like best about Elastic Beanstalk."

"AWS Elastic Beanstalk helps improve my efficiency, saves time, and streamlines application hosting in the cloud."

"I find the versioning to be especially valuable on AWS Elastic Beanstalk."

"Elastic Beanstalk helps reduce system administration as it automates many tasks."

"Elastic Beanstalk, based on my experience and recommendations from friends, is a good solution."

"There is nothing that makes me frustrated while using AWS Elastic Beanstalk, and I would definitely recommend AWS Elastic Beanstalk to others as it is perfect for quick deployment with minimal infrastructure overhead."

"I highly recommend it to others and frequently discuss it with customers."

"The feature I like most about Elastic Beanstalk is the way I do not have to do anything, just deploy my app."

More AWS Elastic Beanstalk pros

"This is a solution that's so easy to expand when you need it to. It's the best I've ever seen. It's much better than Azure."

"I find Google Cloud to be more manageable and cost-effective compared to other solutions, offering good availability and scalability."

"The value for us is the infrastructure as we don't have to host or worry about upgrades."

"I like the simple features that allow me to share documents with others."

"It's available any time you need it."

"The initial setup is very straightforward."

"Most recently, we implemented a data science agent for querying data using natural language, beyond that, it primarily relates to the cost effectiveness of data warehouse running costs versus competitors such as Snowflake."

"In general, the solution is great and I would rate it ten out of ten."

More Google Cloud pros

Cons

"Elastic Beanstalk can enhance its customizability further, especially in terms of deployment options."

"The documentation needs to be clearer, particularly relating to editing JSON files before uploading applications."

"Elastic Beanstalk is powerful, however, it could be enhanced in areas where it abstracts infrastructure management, sometimes limiting advanced users who want granular control over resources like EC2 instances, networking, or load balancers."

"The automatic scaling can be improved so it can handle traffic changes more smoothly."

"Sometimes it is difficult to use for the first time. The automatic scaling functionality could use improvement."

"Sometimes there are issues when auto-scaling with CloudFront."

"Logs and debugging can sometimes be cumbersome, and there could be a more seamless method to analyze application issues without relying heavily on CloudWatch, which would improve my experience."

"From what I've observed, it seems AWS has ceased further development on Elastic Beanstalk."

More AWS Elastic Beanstalk cons

"The analytics that they have are very focused. It serves Google and not really the client."

"I would like for this solution to improve its user interface and documentation."

"When companies grow at a larger scale, they may shift to a different cloud services provider like AWS or Oracle."

"I cannot recall coming across any missing features."

"I would like to see some improvement in the accessibility features of this solution."

"I have not seen any specific measurable benefits in terms of time-saving or manpower saving."

"The initial setup is somewhat more complicated than competing products."

"They need to improve the costing for predictive analytics, which is mainly related to the tools that come with AI. They also need to improve the BigQuery cost optimization and the visualization."

More Google Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"For the license, we didn't have to pay for any additional fees."

"The biggest problem with Google Cloud is price."

"The solution is cheaper than AWS."

"It's not really an expensive solution, but it would be better if there were more flexibility in the pricing model."

"Google Cloud should be divided into modules so that users can buy which module will satisfy them. The overall price of Google Cloud should be reduced, Microsoft is a little bit cheaper. However, if Google divided the cloud offering it would be better. For example, if someone wants to use only for OneDrive they should be able to purchase the service separately, it would reduce the price. There is a license required to use this solution for enterprises. There is a free account, which the users can increase the size of the space. Google cloud is used in most Android Mobile device operating systems."

"Pricing for Google Cloud could be improved. It would be better if it were lower."

"The best part of Google Cloud is that it is cheaper than the competitors."

"The solution is cheaper than Azure."

More Google Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

17%

Computer Software Company

12%

Educational Organization

University

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	38

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Elastic Beanstalk?

My experience with AWS Elastic Beanstalk regarding pricing, setup cost, and licensing was good compared to other services.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Elastic Beanstalk?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS Elastic Beanstalk?

I was using AWS Elastic Beanstalk to deploy my application and to learn data engineering concepts. I used AWS Elastic Beanstalk to test how to change data from raw to useful cases. In that way, I u...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Cloud?

I think perhaps the usability of Google Cloud could be one of the things that might get improved. In terms of not having to type the whole instruction I need to input to the system, just maybe some...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Google Cloud?

My main use case for Google Cloud would be using the functions and the Vertex AI functionality, so mostly AI research and AI deployment. For my AI research and deployment, I use Vertex AI to extrac...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Google Cloud?

On a scale of 1 to 10, I rate Google Cloud a nine. I choose nine because it combines a unique set of tools that are actually helpful and impactful on my daily work. Regarding Google Cloud's AI capa...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure vs AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Compared 19% of the time

Amazon Lightsail vs AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Compared 17% of the time

Heroku vs AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Compared 11% of the time

Google App Engine vs AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Compared 11% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Compared 8% of the time

More AWS Elastic Beanstalk Competitors

Alibaba Cloud vs Google Cloud

Compared 21% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Google Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs Google Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Google Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode) vs Google Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

More Google Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

August 2026

Download AWS Elastic Beanstalk product report

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud

July 2026

Download Google Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

GCP

Overview

AWS Elastic Beanstalk streamlines deploying and managing web applications, providing efficient session management, direct log access, and seamless rollback during deployment for uninterrupted operations.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk is designed for developers seeking ease of use in provisioning and deployment without any application downtime. With auto-scaling capabilities that enhance application performance, users can deploy directly on EC2 or Dockerized environments. While it supports a range of application frameworks, improvements in integration with CloudFront, auto-scaling against AI-based attacks, and simplified HTTPS integrations are suggested by users. Additionally, expanding Docker support and enhancing documentation can address user challenges, offering a more comprehensive experience.

What features make AWS Elastic Beanstalk efficient?

Direct Log Access: Easily retrieve logs through the console for efficient monitoring.
Session Management: Manages sessions between Elastic Beanstalk and RDS smoothly.
Auto-Scaling: Enhances performance by adjusting resources automatically.
Versioning: Allows application changes without downtime, boosting flexibility.

What benefits do users find in AWS Elastic Beanstalk?

Continuous Operation: Seamless rollbacks ensure website functionality during deployments.
Ease of Use: Simplifies the provisioning of applications and environmental configurations.
Flexibility: Offers versatile framework support, catering to different application needs.
Integration: Facilitates integration with services like S3 and LoadBalancer for efficient management.

Organizations adopt AWS Elastic Beanstalk for deploying web applications such as Django, Laravel, native PHP, and .NET Core. They leverage its management capabilities for environmental configurations like Python virtual environments and PHP-FPM. It's a practical tool for educators and businesses managing client migrations, utilizing its seamless integration with AWS services.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Google Cloud offers a comprehensive platform renowned for cost-effectiveness, scalability, robust security, and seamless integration with tools such as Kubernetes, making it suitable for various business functions.

Google Cloud stands out for its ease of setup, stable infrastructure, and user-friendly interface. It provides essential features for AI, data analytics, and reliable storage, supporting multi-regional deployments for diverse applications. While maintaining minimal operational costs, it ensures simplified deployment and comprehensive application capabilities. However, improvements are needed in monitoring tools, customer support, documentation, and pricing options. Enhancements in stability, integration, and workload management are also required.

What are the essential features of Google Cloud?

Cost-effectiveness: Enables budget-friendly operations and reduced operational costs.
Easy Setup: Offers a straightforward and quick setup process.
Scalability: Supports growing business needs with vast resources and infrastructure.
Robust Security: Provides strong protection and compliance measures.
Seamless Integration: Effective integration with tools like Kubernetes and other applications.

What benefits and ROI can be observed?

Reduction in Operational Costs: Minimizes infrastructure and maintenance expenses.
Global Reach: Allows businesses to expand operations across multiple regions.
Flexibility: Adapts to different business models and rapid scaling needs.
Cross-Platform Compatibility: Facilitates integration with existing tools and platforms.

Industries leverage Google Cloud for infrastructure management, analytics, application hosting, and development environments. Entities utilize its cloud network, machine learning support, disaster recovery solutions, and big data handling. Many rely on Workspace tools for communication and virtual machine applications for efficient IT infrastructure deployment.

Google

Buyer's Guide

AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Google Cloud

August 2026

Free Report: AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Google Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Google Cloud and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Google Cloud report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.