IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why
  • Home
  • AWS Control Tower vs. Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation

AWS Control Tower vs Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
report
See Which Vendors Are Best For You
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.
See Recommendations
610,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation?
Top Answer:The most valuable feature of Micro Focus Cloud Service is how user friendly the solution is.
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation?
Top Answer:In the next release, I would like for the information to be more available. The developers have access to information and we are not able to see JCLs on a particular platform because they are kept… more »
What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation?
Top Answer:My organization uses the enterprise server solution, Micro Focus, on Azure. We are working on a project to migrate a mainframe code to the micro-enterprise developer on Azure, submitting our JCL jobs… more »
Ranking
30th
out of 75 in Cloud Management
Views
643
Comparisons
493
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
16th
out of 75 in Cloud Management
Views
693
Comparisons
582
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
390
Rating
9.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Cloud Service Automation Manager, HPE Cloud Service Automation
Learn More
Amazon
Micro Focus
Overview

AWS Control Tower offers the easiest way to set up and govern a new, secure, multi-account AWS environment. It establishes a landing zone that is based on best-practices blueprints, and enables governance using guardrails you can choose from a pre-packaged list.

Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation (CSA) provides open, heterogeneous, extensible enterprise-grade cloud service lifecycle management to design and orchestrate full stack services. CSA embraces existing automation assets with an enhanced orchestration engine, which provides IT with an informed, transparent delivery of secure compliant services for the hybrid cloud.

Offer
Learn more about AWS Control Tower
Learn More
Learn more about Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation
Learn More
Sample Customers
Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
China Merchants Bank, Osiatis
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company26%
Media Company14%
Comms Service Provider11%
Financial Services Firm8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company25%
Comms Service Provider20%
Financial Services Firm10%
Healthcare Company7%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business12%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise76%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise74%
Buyer's Guide
Cloud Management
June 2022
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Turbonomic, an IBM company, Nutanix and others in Cloud Management. Updated: June 2022.
DOWNLOAD NOW
610,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.

AWS Control Tower is ranked 30th in Cloud Management while Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation is ranked 16th in Cloud Management with 1 review. AWS Control Tower is rated 0.0, while Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation writes "A user friendly solution that makes it easy to submit and view jobs". AWS Control Tower is most compared with VMware vRealize Automation (vRA), AWS Trusted Advisor, IBM Cloud Automation Manager and CloudHealth, whereas Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation is most compared with VMware vRealize Automation (vRA), Control-M and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.