AWS Control Tower vs CloudCheckr comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Spot are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.6, while Spot is ranked #30 with an average rating of 7.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 1.4% mindshare in CM, compared to Spot’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Spot users who would recommend it.

AWS Control Tower

Read 18 AWS Control Tower reviews

807 Views
807 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

CloudCheckr

Read 8 CloudCheckr reviews

903 Views
424 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

AWS Control Tower

CloudCheckr

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

CloudCheckr and AWS Control Tower compete in the cloud management and governance category. AWS Control Tower has the upper hand due to higher satisfaction with its features, making it favorable despite CloudCheckr's pricing and support strengths.

Features: CloudCheckr offers detailed cost management, compliance tracking, and asset monitoring, appealing to organizations needing granular resource control. AWS Control Tower provides automated account setup, centralized compliance management, and governance, aligning with businesses seeking streamlined infrastructure oversight. CloudCheckr stands out with comprehensive analysis capabilities, while AWS Control Tower benefits from automation and integration within AWS services.

Room for Improvement: CloudCheckr could enhance its user experience and reduce setup complexity. Better integration with more cloud providers and simplifying its configuration options could be beneficial. AWS Control Tower might improve by expanding feature sets for non-AWS environments, enhancing cost-efficiency, and providing more customizability in configurations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS Control Tower's deployment is seamless within the AWS ecosystem, providing a centralized, automated governance solution that simplifies management tasks and aligns customer service with AWS support. CloudCheckr demands more setup effort due to its detailed configuration options but offers dedicated support for complex deployments. AWS Control Tower's ease of integration surpasses CloudCheckr's more flexible yet expansive setup requirements.

Pricing and ROI: CloudCheckr offers competitive pricing with strong ROI through cost savings and efficiency gains. AWS Control Tower has higher setup costs but validates expenses with enhanced security and governance, ensuring long-term value. While CloudCheckr's cost advantages attract budget-conscious customers, AWS Control Tower's comprehensive features justify the investment with improved operational security.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Control Tower vs. CloudCheckr Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Control Tower vs. CloudCheckr

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Control Tower

Ranking in Cloud Management

8th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

CloudCheckr

Ranking in Cloud Management

30th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Cost Management (10th), Managed Cloud Services (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of AWS Control Tower is 1.4%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CloudCheckr is 1.2%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

MuhammadAzhar Khan

Senior DevOps Engineer at Alibaba Group

Unified security management ensures comprehensive compliance for account safety

Control Tower offers many valuable features for managing all account security. I can manage user security and user IAM, firewall, and other security-related tasks via Control Tower. The unified security management is a crucial aspect, and whenever an AWS organization is used, Control Tower is typically included to ensure comprehensive compliance fulfillment.

Read full review

Peter Ramnath

Associate Director, ITSM & Onboarding at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Provides recommendations regarding how cost and consumption can be adjusted, but the reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited

We are not happy with the product’s reporting capabilities. We are planning to change the solution. The security compliance feature doesn’t give much data because CloudCheckr has done a majority of its development on AWS. The majority of our clients are on Microsoft Azure. There are a lot of features and information available for Amazon, but not for Azure. The tool wasn't meeting our expectations. The reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited. There's no ability to do scheduled email reports. The report could only be sent to a single email address. The tool was not very usable. We had multiple clients and tasks to work with.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It provides centralized solutions for all AWS accounts in one place, customized to meet the organization's specific needs."

"It offers automated recommendations for security and policies, creating a landing zone and providing a list of policies."

"AWS Control Tower helps companies save costs."

"It aligns well with the customer's needs and it ultimately fosters a strong customer-company relationship."

"With Control Tower, there are ready-to-use automated templates available, simplifying the implementation of a centralized management solution."

"There are two features in Control Tower which are the most valuable. One is the guardrails because it has preventive and detective guardrails."

"The solution's initial setup was easy for me."

"Compliance is the most valuable feature."

More AWS Control Tower pros

"The recommendation section is pretty helpful."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"It will automatically suggest areas for optimization."

"The best feature I like about CloudCheckr CMx High Security is its simplicity. I love that it's not rocket science to use the solution. Even if you're not familiar with the cloud, you can easily figure out how to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security. You can use AWS, you can use Azure, and you can use GCP with the solution because the integration is quite simple. You can also use multi-cloud with it, and you could see the billing part. You'll have complete visibility into your cost which I love about the solution. I also love that data on any security issues and vulnerabilities are available on the go with CloudCheckr CMx High Security. You don't need to do anything different. Just run the scan and you'll have all these open findings in the tool, in terms of the priority level, so if it's critical, it will tell you, "It's critical," and you need to fix it right away."

"The most valuable feature of CloudCheckr CMx High Security is granular reporting. Additionally, the user interface is easy to use."

"It's one of the leading players for cloud optimization. It's hard to find anything better."

"The solution is scalable for our purposes."

"The solution is mostly stable."

Cons

"By making APIs and organizational units more centralized, it would be simpler to pinpoint the source of issues in case of a breach and would ultimately benefit everyone involved."

"It would be beneficial if AWS offered the capability to seamlessly deploy your infrastructure to another region to ensure continuous availability and redundancy."

"It is essential to clarify that this isn't necessarily a drawback of the service, but having a clear and concise set of predefined guidelines from AWS for moving existing accounts under AWS Control Tower would be highly beneficial as it would simplify the process and make it more user-friendly."

"The solution's stability could be improved."

"The tool's setup is very technical. Its pricing can be cheaper."

"AWS Control Tower should improve its fast execution. It also needs more tools for triggering and monitoring AWS services. AWS Control Tower needs more tracking as well."

"It could be improved by having a more intuitive graphical interface. It could also include other coding languages like PowerShell and Python, as it would be beneficial for DevOps recommendations."

"The sole drawback is its restriction to enable only one Control Tower."

More AWS Control Tower cons

"The solution needs to work better with larger capacities of data."

"The reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited."

"The performance of the tool really needs to be improved."

"Self-healing could be a bit smoother and a bit cleaner, easier to access and more functional. That would help."

"Many features still need to be implemented in this tool."

"The solution must improve its user interface."

"What needs to be improved in CloudCheckr CMx High Security is integration. All the clouds are going quite fast, for example, all the cloud providers: Microsoft, Google, etc. CloudCheckr CMx High Security is good with AWS, no doubt about it, but with Azure and Google Cloud, I find that the solution is slow in that direction. If the vendor planned for CloudCheckr CMx High Security to be automated just for AWS, then it does make sense. If not, if the vendor is also targeting good integration with Google and Microsoft, then CloudCheckr CMx High Security integration needs improvement, in particular, it has to be faster. At the moment, its integration with Azure is not as good as its integration with AWS. With GCP, integration is nowhere."

"CloudCheckr CMx High Security is complex. There are a lot of menus, and if you do not know what you are looking for you can get lost. However, the interface is self-explanatory. It's easy to understand where to go to get what you want."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost is reasonable, but there are opportunities for improvement in terms of pricing for larger enterprises."

"I believe it's free of charge or comes at a very low cost. It's an additional feature. Even if there is a fee, it's minimal. AWS seems to assist customers in gaining a comprehensive view of their security setups within AWS. Using Control Tower is highly recommended, especially as your company grows and involves Active Directory, various departments, and different architectural aspects. It becomes more advisable to leverage Control Tower rather than managing these aspects manually, especially for larger organizations."

"The pay-as-you-go model ensures you're only charged for what you use, which offers great flexibility for different types of companies."

"It is expensive but it is an investment in my opinion."

"AWS Control Tower is not really that expensive."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price and ten is a high price, I rate the pricing an eight."

"The product's affordability depends on the value it brings to specific organizations."

"The pricing structure is closely intertwined with the specifics of your environment and the billing strategy you employ."

More AWS Control Tower pricing and cost advice

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"The cost is on par with other providers."

"A license is needed to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security, but because we are a managed service provider, the price of the license would vary. It depends on the type of cloud users we have, for example, it would be some type of percentage or monthly billing, etc."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS Control Tower?

The most intriguing feature is the automatic generation of user accounts. Leveraging Active Directory and global company settings, AWS Cloud Tower enables the creation of AWS user accounts based on...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Control Tower?

Control Tower within the AWS Organization does not have a charge. It is free and does not incur additional charges.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Control Tower?

I believe AWS Control Tower could be improved. I compare it with Huawei Cloud's enterprise project, which is a similar concept but different implementation. In Huawei Cloud, you partition in one si...

See all answers

What do you like most about CloudCheckr ?

The recommendation section is pretty helpful.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudCheckr ?

The price depends on the actual Azure consumption and what we feed into it. The cost is on par with other providers.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudCheckr ?

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Trusted Advisor vs AWS Control Tower

Compared 33% of the time

Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure vs AWS Control Tower

Compared 29% of the time

Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control vs AWS Control Tower

Compared 26% of the time

Morpheus vs AWS Control Tower

Compared 11% of the time

More AWS Control Tower Competitors

Flexera Cloud Cost Management vs CloudCheckr

Compared 19% of the time

Apptio One vs CloudCheckr

Compared 15% of the time

Cloudability vs CloudCheckr

Compared 15% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs CloudCheckr

Compared 13% of the time

AWS Cost Explorer vs CloudCheckr

Compared 11% of the time

More CloudCheckr Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Control Tower

August 2025

Download AWS Control Tower product report

Buyer's Guide

CloudCheckr

August 2025

Download CloudCheckr product report

Also Known As

No data available

CloudCheckr CMx High Security, CloudCheckr CMP

Overview

AWS Control Tower offers the easiest way to set up and govern a new, secure, multi-account AWS environment. It establishes a landing zone that is based on best-practices blueprints, and enables governance using guardrails you can choose from a pre-packaged list.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

CloudCheckr CMx High Security is a cloud management platform that provides complete visibility into cost and security issues. The primary use cases are day-to-day operations, cloud management, identifying open vulnerabilities and issues from a security perspective, and cost management and optimization.

The solution is praised for its stability, simplicity, ease of use, scalability, excellent technical support, and granular reporting. CloudCheckr CMx High Security provides priority-level data on security issues and vulnerabilities, making it easy to identify critical issues that need immediate attention.

Spot

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Accenture, Logitech, Ingram, Cloudar, Infor, DXC, Cornell University, DLT, Lumen, Lightstream, Choice Hotels, B-Tech, SmileShark, PTP, Explicity, JCH Technology, Siemens Mobility

Buyer's Guide

AWS Control Tower vs. CloudCheckr

July 2025

Free Report: AWS Control Tower vs. CloudCheckr

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Control Tower vs. CloudCheckr and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Control Tower vs. CloudCheckr report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.