Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS Batch vs Zadara comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on May 21, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS Batch
Ranking in Compute Service
6th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Zadara
Ranking in Compute Service
10th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
All-Flash Storage (32nd), Software Defined Storage (SDS) (16th), Public Cloud Storage Services (15th), File and Object Storage (22nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Compute Service category, the mindshare of AWS Batch is 10.7%, down from 20.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zadara is 3.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Compute Service Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
AWS Batch10.7%
Zadara3.9%
Other85.4%
Compute Service
 

Featured Reviews

KP
Senior Battery Data Engineer at a agriculture with 51-200 employees
Enables efficient scaling and robust integration despite debugging challenges
The main feature I like about AWS Batch is its scalability. Whether ten extraction jobs or ten thousand jobs are running, it works seamlessly and scales seamlessly. The Fargate option is cost-effective and efficient, removing dependency on EC2 instances. AWS Batch also integrates with the entire AWS ecosystem, including S3, Lambda, and AWS Lambda Step Functions, making it robust. I can use different services with AWS Batch, trigger it through other services, and orchestrate AWS Batch jobs. AWS Batch allows time-extensive workloads to run for days without interruption, unlike AWS Lambda's fifteen-minute hard deadline. It's reliable and cost-effective, and it has been a good solution since 2021.
Kirubel Behailu - PeerSpot reviewer
Cloud System Engineer at cloud251
Enhancing storage management efficiency with user-friendly experience
Our customers are using Zadara for their research and development environments. We provide infrastructure for government projects, but we are often not fully aware of their specific usage.  I typically use it for our infrastructure and offer both Zadara and Microsoft Azure to our customers Zadara…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The main feature I like about AWS Batch is its scalability; whether ten extraction jobs or ten thousand jobs are running, it works seamlessly and scales seamlessly."
"AWS Batch manages the execution of computing workload, including job scheduling, provisioning, and scaling."
"AWS Batch is invaluable for parallelizing processes and samples, which is essential for our large data sets, such as terabytes of genome data."
"There is one other feature in confirmation or call confirmation where you can have templates of what you want to do and just modify those to customize it to your needs. And these templates basically make it a lot easier for you to get started."
"I appreciate that AWS Batch works with EC2, allowing me to launch jobs and automatically spin up the EC2 instance to run them; when the jobs are completed, the EC2 instance shuts down, making it cost-effective."
"AWS Batch is a cost-effective way to perform batch processing, primarily using spot instances and containers."
"AWS Batch's deployment was easy."
"The main feature I like about AWS Batch is its scalability; whether ten extraction jobs or ten thousand jobs are running, it works seamlessly and scales seamlessly."
"With Zadara Storage Cloud, you simplify the management, which is absolutely true."
"Zadara Storage Cloud having 24/7 management saves me support and engineering costs because the storage and computing are managed by a third-party. We are able to focus more attention on the customer, which is truly our core business. Even at 1:00 AM or 2:00 AM at night, someone will answer, which is important."
"The most valuable feature of Zadara is its ease of use and safety, and overall the solution is a complete package with all the features needed."
"The most valuable features of Zadara are its visibility and simplicity to use."
"I find Zadara's user-friendliness from both the customer and engineering perspectives highly appreciated."
"Zadara saves both time and money."
"Overall Zadara is a useful solution that provides good services."
"It provides very satisfactory storage performance."
 

Cons

"The error handling capabilities could be more robust, particularly when using Spot Instances."
"The main drawback to using AWS Batch would be the cost. It will be more expensive in some cases than using an HPC. It's more amenable to cases where you have spot requirements."
"One main issue with AWS Batch is the startup time for Fargate, which takes 30 seconds, challenging for running quick jobs."
"When we run a lot of batch jobs, the UI must show the history."
"AWS Batch needs to improve its documentation."
"Sometimes, debugging errors in AWS Batch can be complex."
"Setting up IAM privileges is cumbersome for me, as I am not a Cloud Engineer by training."
"The solution should include better and seamless integration with other AWS services, like Amazon S3 data storage and EC2 compute resources."
"Having iSCSI over the internet using a VPN, the IPSec tunnel is really the only thing that I find missing from this product."
"Some of the features are a little bit slow to come to market."
"I would like to see them be a little bit more proactive in terms of the patches and updates that are available."
"There are still some storage features that they lack. For example, other vendors implemented the auto-tiering feature a long time ago, while Zadara Storage Cloud is just coming out with this feature today. So, they are a little bit late compared to the market."
"The initial installation was difficult because many steps required the command line interface (CLI). Maintenance can also be complicated, especially when deeper troubleshooting requires navigating the CLI and searching for logs."
"Cost-wise, because it's a pay-per-use model, it may ultimately end up costing us more in the long run than something we developed ourselves."
"I wouldn't say that it's very stable. It can recover from outages, however, there's still room for improvement on the stability."
"There are still some storage features that they lack. For example, other vendors implemented the auto-tiering feature a long time ago, while Zadara Storage Cloud is just coming out with this feature today."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS Batch's pricing is good."
"AWS Batch is a cheap solution."
"The pricing is very fair."
"The price of Zadara is very good and it covers everything. There is no subscription needed."
"One of the factors that ruled out several providers was cost. They were way too expensive for the volume of data that we needed and the speed at which we needed to be able to manage it. There aren't a lot of providers that can do that."
"If you just take the street price of Zadara Storage Cloud and look up the price or cost per hour, then you could think that Zadara Storage Cloud is extremely expensive or a solution only for enterprise use. That is not true. You need to compare the entire system. This means that you don't stop looking at just the street price, but you need to consider all the features, requirements, and costs of support as well as the extra cost that other vendors have. Other players just play with hidden, additional costs. Everything is included in Zadara Storage Cloud's licensing cost; what you get is what you pay for."
"The pricing is very competitive and the fact that they have very compelling discounts for multi-year commitments is great."
"It is a nice licensing model and it makes it quite simple because we just pay for what we use, and the bill that comes shows us exactly what customers are using what resources."
"The pricing and licensing are very simple and the cost is predictable, although, like everything that you pay for as you use, you have to be mindful of what you're using."
"For our use, it's appropriately priced and overall, it's proved to be very cost-effective against other tier-one vendors."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Compute Service solutions are best for your needs.
885,286 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
30%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
University
6%
Computer Software Company
14%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Large Enterprise6
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Large Enterprise4
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better, AWS Lambda or Batch?
AWS Lambda is a serverless solution. It doesn’t require any infrastructure, which allows for cost savings. There is no setup process to deal with, as the entire solution is in the cloud. If you use...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Batch?
Pricing is good, as AWS Batch allows specifying spot instances, providing cost-effective solutions when launching jobs and spinning up EC2 instances.
What needs improvement with AWS Batch?
I haven't identified any significant improvements for AWS Batch. In other AWS services, I've encountered issues with APIs and documentation, but AWS Batch is straightforward and user-friendly. The ...
What needs improvement with Zadara?
The initial installation was difficult because many steps required the command line interface (CLI). Maintenance can also be complicated, especially when deeper troubleshooting requires navigating ...
What is your primary use case for Zadara?
I use this product as storage. Specifically, I use it as big storage. That's the main use case for Zadara ( /products/zadara-reviews ).
What advice do you have for others considering Zadara?
As for the pros and cons, the main concerns are the complexity of the initial installation and the complicated maintenance due to the CLI usage. Overall, I do not have other complaints. My overall ...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Amazon Batch
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Hess, Expedia, Kelloggs, Philips, HyperTrack
Time, Inc. A&E Network, The Washington Post, News UK, McGraw Hill, Gilt, Toshiba, Deloitte, VMware
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Batch vs. Zadara and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
885,286 professionals have used our research since 2012.