

AppDynamics and AWS Auto Scaling both compete in the IT operations scaling and monitoring category. AppDynamics has the upper hand in providing transaction-level visibility and deep application insights, while AWS Auto Scaling shines with its automatic EC2 instance adjustments and ease of vertical scaling within AWS.
Features: AppDynamics offers dynamic baselining, end-to-end transaction tracing, and transaction snapshots for performance insights. AWS Auto Scaling provides features like automatic instance scaling, scalable infrastructure through EC2, and integration with AWS services for seamless vertical scaling.
Room for Improvement: AppDynamics could enhance its dashboarding, offer a more intuitive interface, and support emerging technologies like Kubernetes. AWS Auto Scaling might improve its configuration process and incorporate AI-driven cost management tools for better resource control.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AppDynamics requires more manual setup but supports on-premises and hybrid environments, while AWS Auto Scaling is simpler to deploy within AWS's cloud ecosystem. AppDynamics offers comprehensive technical support, whereas AWS provides responsive assistance through its extensive resources.
Pricing and ROI: AppDynamics is expensive due to its complex licensing model but justifies the cost with significant ROI in application performance. AWS Auto Scaling offers competitive pricing with a pay-as-you-use model, making it cost-effective for AWS-reliant businesses with scaling needs.
Overall, as a production gatekeeper, we achieve at least 50% efficiency immediately, with potential savings ranging from 60 to 70% as well, reinforcing why it is a popular tool in the banking industry.
According to errors, exceptions, and code-level details related to their application performance on a daily basis, the application development team tries to help with Splunk AppDynamics to reduce errors and exceptions, which helps the end users get application availability and feel more confident.
To understand the magnitude of it, when the company asked to replace Splunk AppDynamics with another tool, I indicated that for the proposed tool, we would need five people to do the analysis that Splunk AppDynamics enables me to do.
AWS support is very good.
AppDynamics is much more helpful.
We got a contact, an account manager, to work directly with for technical support.
They help us resolve any issues raised by our team relating to operations, application instrumentation, or any other issues.
Scalability is impressive, as it allowed us to go from 1,000 to 10,000 active users within a week during a traffic spike.
We have reached maximum capacity in our tier, and extending capacity has not been cost-effective from Splunk's perspective.
I would rate the scalability of Splunk AppDynamics as a nine out of ten.
I assess how Splunk AppDynamics scales with the growing needs of my organization as good, since we are growing and adding more servers.
It is necessary to conduct appropriate testing before deploying them in production to prevent potential outages.
There are no issues or bugs with the 20.4 version; it is very stable with no functionality or operational issues.
Splunk AppDynamics is superior to any alternative, including Dynatrace.
This complexity led me to migrate to CloudFormation, which simplifies the deployment process.
It requires a downtime before deploying the Auto Scaling group.
If you could add more training on how to use it correctly and on the functions that I haven't used before or some people have not really used before, that would help.
Splunk AppDynamics does not support the complete MELT framework, which includes metrics, events, logging, and tracing for the entire stack.
AI could provide more insights for annual or half-yearly reports and forecast future changes in the asset landscape.
If AppDynamics could develop a means to monitor without an agent, it could significantly improve application performance and reduce potential problems.
The pricing of Auto Scaling is medium range, neither high nor low.
We completed a three-year deal for Splunk and for AppDynamics, which costs millions of dollars.
Overall, I consider Splunk AppDynamics an expensive product; it's very expensive.
The resource team finds the best prices, ensuring that Splunk AppDynamics is an acceptable option for the end user.
During peak traffic times, the Auto Scaling group can be deployed to ensure that the client works well, and the traffic remains average.
The automation aspect where you can automate it to whatever you want is what I value the most about Auto Scaling.
Its automatic scaling capabilities are very useful.
We have multiple tools, but end users prefer to use Splunk AppDynamics because their portal navigation is very simple and clear.
The real user monitoring and digital experience monitoring effectively track actual user experience with the applications, including page loading, interaction time for both desktop and mobile applications.
This is the best feature because, although you can't monitor a whole application at once, Splunk AppDynamics gives you the option that if there is any failure—simple failure regarding anything set up as per our use cases—you will get an alert.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Splunk AppDynamics | 3.8% |
| AWS Auto Scaling | 0.4% |
| Other | 95.8% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 12 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 56 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 36 |
| Large Enterprise | 200 |
AWS Auto Scaling monitors your applications and automatically adjusts capacity to maintain steady, predictable performance at the lowest possible cost. Using AWS Auto Scaling, it’s easy to setup application scaling for multiple resources across multiple services in minutes. The service provides a simple, powerful user interface that lets you build scaling plans for resources including Amazon EC2 instances and Spot Fleets, Amazon ECS tasks, Amazon DynamoDB tables and indexes, and Amazon Aurora Replicas. AWS Auto Scaling makes scaling simple with recommendations that allow you to optimize performance, costs, or balance between them. If you’re already using Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling to dynamically scale your Amazon EC2 instances, you can now combine it with AWS Auto Scaling to scale additional resources for other AWS services. With AWS Auto Scaling, your applications always have the right resources at the right time.
Splunk AppDynamics is a comprehensive performance monitoring tool providing end-to-end transaction tracking, real-time monitoring, and a user-friendly interface. With AI-powered features, it enhances operational efficiency and resilience by offering insights into user interactions and infrastructure issues.
Splunk AppDynamics excels in monitoring applications and infrastructure performance, offering extensive support across environments like AWS and cloud. It aids in application performance monitoring, end-user experience, database analysis, and proactive incident detection. Supporting Java, .NET, and other technologies, it provides real-time insights into application health, resource utilization, and transaction tracking, ensuring reliable user experiences. Challenges remain in UI complexity, agent-based architecture, integration with diverse environments, and documentation clarity. Its licensing model is costly, and customer support may be slow. Performance concerns exist in historical data granularity and network visibility.
What features make Splunk AppDynamics stand out?Organizations in industries like finance and healthcare implement Splunk AppDynamics to monitor critical applications and infrastructure. Its capabilities in transaction tracking and AI-driven insights are crucial for maintaining system reliability, supporting technologies such as Java and .NET, and ensuring optimal resource utilization.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.