Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Automaton vs SmartBear TestLeft comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Automaton
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
42nd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Regression Testing Tools (19th)
SmartBear TestLeft
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
37th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Automaton is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SmartBear TestLeft is 0.2%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
SmartBear TestLeft0.2%
Automaton0.1%
Other99.7%
Functional Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Use Automaton?
Share your opinion
reviewer1378161 - PeerSpot reviewer
Simple to set up and the test execute feature is helpful, but the cost could be reduced
Our primary use case is Point of Sale (POS) testing The most valuable features are test executor and development. TestLeft captures a lot of space in terms of memory, which is one issue that can be improved. We have been using SmartBear TestLeft for the past month. Stability-wise, TestLeft is…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
872,019 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Schneider Electric, Orange, O2, IBM, JPMorgan Chase
American Red Cross, CISCO, HONDA, ADIDAS, TBC bank
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, UiPath and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: October 2025.
872,019 professionals have used our research since 2012.