Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Ataccama ONE Platform vs Comet comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Ataccama ONE Platform
Ranking in AI Observability
40th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Data Quality (4th), Data Scrubbing Software (4th), Master Data Management (MDM) Software (5th), Data Governance (11th)
Comet
Ranking in AI Observability
14th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.8
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
AIOps (16th)
 

Featured Reviews

Akhil Danturti - PeerSpot reviewer
Data Governance Analyst at Entain India
Streamlines reusable data quality rules and has highlighted the need for richer logic and documentation
I worked in Ataccama ONE Platform from version 5 and now we have version 15, which has improved a lot. However, there is still considerable scope for improvement because Ataccama ONE Platform was not that great around 2020 when I started working with it. There can still be more features including writing any logic, improving more keywords for logic building, and enhancing address validation, based on my understanding. User experience is actually good; I do not have any complaints or feedback on that. However, the documentation part can be improved because documentation is key for any organization or tool. If anything is needed for understanding, you have to rely on documentation. Ataccama's documentation has potential for improvement.
Ujjwal Mule - PeerSpot reviewer
Data Dev Ops Engineer at Proton Technologies
Experiment tracking has transformed model comparisons and now supports faster, clearer insights
I would like to see more flexibility around content and reporting in Comet. Overall, the features are very strong, but having more customizable dashboards or easier ways to create shareable summaries for non-technical stakeholders would be helpful. It would make it easier to turn experiment results into clear insights without exporting data to other tools. There is a need for some improvements in Comet. It is very strong overall, but there are a few areas where it can be improved. For example, more flexibility in dashboards and content customization would be helpful, especially for creating summaries for non-technical stakeholders. Additionally, some advanced features have a learning curve, so slightly simpler onboarding or guided tips would make it easier for new users or freshers. These are minor points and they do not affect my regular day-to-day usage, but from the perspective of a fresher or new users, it could be improved.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"At the beginning, we had almost 80 percent data quality, and after using Ataccama ONE Platform, we reached 90 percent."
"The drag-and-drop feature is incredibly flexible and straightforward."
"The data profile itself is excellent. You can understand the quality of the data in layman's terms."
"The ease of use of the user console is valuable."
"The desktop version of the solution was particularly valuable to me, primarily for creating components. We opted for the data quality aspect to assess the quality of our data warehouse. The functionalities available allowed us to not only check data quality but also serve as an ETL tool. This versatility enabled data transformation and storage in various formats, including files on platforms like SharePoint or local online directories. The flexibility of the tool catered to the specific needs of those building components, contributing to our desired outcomes."
"The product’s important feature is data profiling and quality check."
"Customer service was excellent, and I would give it a ten out of ten."
"Ataccama ONE Platform has positively impacted my organization by being much cheaper compared to other DQ tools and providing very good support."
"Model metric tracking and comparison has been extremely beneficial, and Comet's customer service has also been excellent—any issue we've had, they have been able to help us resolve."
"Previously, it used to take a few hours to collect results and prepare comparisons, but now with Comet, this takes minutes instead of hours."
 

Cons

"It was a little tough for my team to learn and start using Ataccama ONE Platform because the documentation at that time was not good."
"The interfacing to tools such as Collibra was somewhat cumbersome and required more thought."
"I think the algorithms used in Ataccama ONE Platform need to be defined more and more to figure out things much more perfectly than they are now."
"There is a notable challenge in having to provide detailed filters before the site recognizes the search criteria."
"Speaking specifically about the version we use, version 12.3, I'm unsure if this has been addressed in subsequent versions. One improvement I'd like to see pertains to the language used in certain components, especially in data quality checks. The language complexity posed a challenge for beginners. Although we had on-site assistance from Ataccama, making it manageable for us, some individuals found it difficult to comprehend, necessitating additional support. The provision of a comprehensive guide for on-premise installation can also be enhanced. The lack of detailed information on the solution's workings and the overwhelming nature of notifications, with extensive content, were areas of concern. Streamlining the notification content in newer versions would significantly expedite issue resolution."
"I believe it would be beneficial if it could enhance its flexibility to connect with a wider range of downstream systems beyond just Excel and Postgres."
"They could focus more on marketing the product. The current marketing strategy is not working."
"When hybrid deployment is done, it doesn't have an option to load any kind of file directly into Ataccama ONE Platform."
"Additionally, some advanced features have a learning curve, so slightly simpler onboarding or guided tips would make it easier for new users or freshers."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our licensing model wasn't user-specific; instead, we paid fees for the engine and maintenance. As we didn't have a support contract, maintenance fees were likely nonexistent. Regarding the upgrade, we had an account for the initial two or three years, and considering the features provided by the solution, the pricing was reasonable."
"The product is reasonably priced."
"Despite not being extremely low-cost, the pricing appears reasonable, making it a profitable and viable choice for companies that prioritize data security and adhere to specific policies."
"There is no need to buy a license. You can just download it and use it for free."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Observability solutions are best for your needs.
881,821 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Computer Software Company
8%
Energy/Utilities Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Large Enterprise11
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Ataccama ONE Platform?
I worked in Ataccama ONE Platform from version 5 and now we have version 15, which has improved a lot. However, there is still considerable scope for improvement because Ataccama ONE Platform was n...
What is your primary use case for Ataccama ONE Platform?
My main use case for Ataccama ONE Platform is to develop data quality rules, apply them in the monitoring project, and then triage the issues with the data quality rules. For example, we had a proj...
What advice do you have for others considering Ataccama ONE Platform?
Ataccama ONE Platform was on-premise before but has moved to a hybrid cloud now. Ataccama ONE Platform integrates with other tools or systems in my organization. Ataccama ONE Platform connects with...
What needs improvement with Comet for SageMaker Partner AI Apps?
SageMaker itself has a cumbersome interface, which makes launching Comet somewhat of a hassle.
What is your primary use case for Comet for SageMaker Partner AI Apps?
I use Comet for experiment and asset tracking during model development, as well as to support model reproducibility and transparency. I also appreciate the ability to perform an on-prem installatio...
 

Also Known As

Ataccama DQ Analyzer
Comet for SageMaker Partner AI Apps
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Société Générale, First Data, Raiffeisenbank International, T-Mobile, Avast, RSA, Toronto Public Library
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, SentinelOne, Dynatrace and others in AI Observability. Updated: January 2026.
881,821 professionals have used our research since 2012.