We performed a comparison between Ataccama DQ Analyzer and Talend Data Quality based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Talend, Ataccama, Experian and others in Data Scrubbing Software."It is also easy to deploy."
"The data profile itself is excellent. You can understand the quality of the data in layman's terms."
"This product speeds up the unit testing and QA for specific test scenarios. As a result, the development output quality can be evaluated and adjusted."
"I like idea of storing the results of Data Quality jobs in a DB and having the ability to run reports in the DB to show a dashboard of quality metrics."
"tLogRows are also great for finding bad data."
"The features that I find to be the most valuable are the extensibility, the integration, and the ease of integration with multiple platforms."
"It reduces the QA effort immensely by handling most of the test scenarios in a reusable way."
"It offers advanced features that allow you to create custom patterns and use regular expressions to identify data issues."
"It has definitely streamlined certain processes."
"I really like the fact that there are no out-of-the-box solutions regarding the development of jobs. Other vendors may have modules which cleanse your addresses. In Talend, you have the freedom to completely develop the process yourself. This can be tricky, but it also makes it fun."
"Although DQA can fetch data from most of the commonly used data sources, it has limited modifiers to get data, meaning that the number of technologies from which the data can be acquired is limited. For example, DQA does not support fetching data from Twitter or Facebook. Many competitors have this feature."
"They could focus more on marketing the product. The current marketing strategy is not working."
"If we encounter issues, it’s most likely when using the Talend Open Studio. The studio can be slow, get stuck, or crash. But again, it can be caused by the resources of your machine or your connection with the repository. If we encounter issues with the Studio we restart the Studio. In emergencies, we create and use a new workspace."
"The ability to change the code when debugging the JavaScript could be improved."
"Needs integrated data governance in terms of dictionaries, glossaries, data lineage, and impact analysis. It also needs operationalization of meta-data."
"There are more functions in a non-streamlined manner, which could be refined to arrive at a better off-the-shelf functions."
"Heap space issues plague us consistently. We maxed it out and it runs fine, then it doesn’t, then it does."
"When we upgraded to Version 6.4.1, we tried using a GIT repository instead of a SVN repository. After a few incidents where things disappeared and changes were not saved, we decided to go back to a SVN repository."
"I would say that some of the support elements need improvement."
"Finding assistance with issues can be spotty. With Python, there are literally millions of open source answers which are recent and apply to the version that we are using."
Ataccama DQ Analyzer is ranked 2nd in Data Scrubbing Software with 4 reviews while Talend Data Quality is ranked 1st in Data Scrubbing Software with 20 reviews. Ataccama DQ Analyzer is rated 7.8, while Talend Data Quality is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Ataccama DQ Analyzer writes "Is easy to deploy and is free, but marketing strategies need improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Talend Data Quality writes "Saves a lot of time, good ROI, seamless integration with different databases, and stable". Ataccama DQ Analyzer is most compared with Alteryx and Informatica Address Verification, whereas Talend Data Quality is most compared with Informatica Data Quality, Alteryx, Precisely Trillium, Informatica Cloud Data Quality and Informatica Address Verification.
See our list of best Data Scrubbing Software vendors.
We monitor all Data Scrubbing Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.