We performed a comparison between Aruba Virtual Intranet Access and Cisco IOS SSL VPN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN, Fortinet, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN."The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution is very user friendly."
"It is highly scalable, speedy, and reliable."
"Stability-wise, it is a very good solution."
"It helps us access networks from anywhere."
"With Cisco IOS SSL VPN, you can access your corporate data safely and securely."
"It is a stable solution. In my company, we haven't faced any issues related to the product's stability. I rate the product's stability a ten out of ten."
"Cisco IOS SSL VPN provides fast connectivity and the option to connect through multiple servers."
"The solution is pretty fast."
"The multicast feature is useful for us."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"Configurations can be a bit complex."
"Multi-factor authentication in Cisco IOS SSL VPN has certain shortcomings that need improvement."
"In terms of what needs improvement, it should have better integration. Although, it might have already been taken care of."
"I think the administration can be improved to include web interfaces."
"The solution's configuration could be made easier."
"It would be nice if we could use this not just on mobile, but on laptops and desktops as well."
"I would like for it to have support for the Dutch language. I typically use English in 99% of our communications but for some people, it matters."
"They could provide the cloud-based as-a-service model with monthly rental payments."
"The administration should be improved."
Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is ranked 31st in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 1 review while Cisco IOS SSL VPN is ranked 9th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 47 reviews. Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is rated 7.0, while Cisco IOS SSL VPN is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Aruba Virtual Intranet Access writes "Very user friendly but configurations can be a bit complex". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco IOS SSL VPN writes "The solution is very stable and scalable, but it is expensive, and the configuration is complicated". Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, Ivanti Connect Secure and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, whereas Cisco IOS SSL VPN is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), Fortinet FortiClient, Zyxel VPN Client, Ivanti Connect Secure and Citrix Gateway.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
