No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Arize AI vs Rapid7 InsightCloudSec comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Arize AI
Ranking in AI Observability
29th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Model Monitoring (2nd)
Rapid7 InsightCloudSec
Ranking in AI Observability
7th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Management (12th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (13th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (10th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the AI Observability category, the mindshare of Arize AI is 0.8%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rapid7 InsightCloudSec is 1.2%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AI Observability Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Rapid7 InsightCloudSec1.2%
Arize AI0.8%
Other98.0%
AI Observability
 

Featured Reviews

SM
Consultant at a consultancy with 51-200 employees
Automation has replaced manual customer operations and is improving accuracy and focus
I can say that the best features Arize AI offers is that I do not need to use multiple software solutions. Suppose I do not need to connect with third-party apps; it is a complete AI team. It is not just one software; it is a complete AI team. I can do anything available from this one software. I need not merge any third-party software. I need not integrate it. All the things that I want to do as an agent, a basic AI agent, I can access Arize AI and create an agent. I can trace from there, evaluate from there, experiment, give a prompt, monitor, and give annotation. All the things are possible. The feature I use most often and find the most valuable in my daily work is that the prompt playground is more of a benefit for me. We can give a prompt, set the functions, and see how users interact with it. All these things, and we can target our language from the features. We can send messages also. We can see auto-generated prompts. We can view them from here. We can run two prompts at a time. We can run multiple prompts at a time. I think it is quite useful. In the prompt playground, I can see we can do most of the things. We can translate the prompt from one thing to another. We can use any of ChatGPT. We can use any model from the AI, such as GPT, and we can use any parameters. It is not limited to one software. We can change software also. We can use AI bots also from here. I think that is quite useful. Arize AI has positively impacted my organization by reducing most of our manual work. We have shifted to complete automation from this. Working hours are reduced and we are more focused. There is less chance of mistakes. We are more focused toward accuracy and can focus more on our work.
Arun Babu - PeerSpot reviewer
SOC analyst at a media company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Daily endpoint monitoring has improved investigations and saved time but detection rules still need tuning
It is important to note that Rapid7 InsightCloudSec's features are not 100% precise, but I find about 70% of the time it is satisfactory. I would like to suggest that you improve it to be more precise, ideally making it 100% if possible. Some cases in Rapid7 InsightCloudSec indicate that the log is not enough, as they mostly just generate alerts, and the synchronization between data connectors is often problematic, particularly in terms of not being in sync always, especially between the AD and Rapid7 alerts, which generates numerous false positives. Additionally, the traditional rules should be updated, as this is a main point worth mentioning since we spend a lot of time fine-tuning these traditional rules. I suggest improving the legacy detection rules. If there are any authentication cases, such as impossible travel activity where a user has their SharePoint hosted in a different location, Rapid7 can often trigger alerts, creating confusion as we cannot fine-tune it properly. Another issue is with honeypot access. We sometimes lack necessary logs because Defender's advanced threat protection scanning gets detected as honeypot activity by Rapid7, leading to annoying and noisy alerts that we need to constantly close. If you can improve the traditional detection rules to reflect current detection rules, it would make it significantly easier for us to manage, as we constantly need to check legacy rules to update or possibly turn them off. Updating the legacy rules should be a priority.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Arize AI has positively impacted my organization by reducing most of our manual work, shifting us to complete automation, reducing working hours, and allowing us to focus more on accuracy with less chance of mistakes."
"Arize AI has made leadership more comfortable with introducing AI features by providing better visibility into failures and reducing unexpected issues in production."
"I can confirm money and time savings with Rapid7 InsightCloudSec, as we can scan the entire IP range simultaneously instead of manually checking each asset for vulnerabilities, reducing the need for technicians to move around the organization and thus saving significant time."
"The fastest scanning is the best feature Rapid7 InsightCloudSec offers, helping me respond to threats quickly in my daily operations."
"Rapid7 InsightCloudSec has helped us save thirty percent time in our log retrievals, and it completely changed log searching, making it really fast when we search for logs, with no prior knowledge required."
"ICSE is cheaper compared to other tools and has a pleasant user experience with good support."
"I find the security frameworks and security tools valuable. I think they're good in the infrastructure of the code security. They are also good at threat protection."
"Rapid7 InsightCloudSec has positively impacted my organization because we are using Microsoft Defender for endpoint protection alongside Rapid7."
"It runs every hour and has been reliable since I started."
"ICSE is cheaper compared to other tools and has a pleasant user experience with good support."
 

Cons

"I think we can improve its interface."
"More end-to-end architecture examples would be beneficial as current technical documentation is solid, but more practical examples are desired."
"Rapid7 InsightCloudSec needs to provide more granular search capabilities, such as the ability to search back the last three months."
"There are a lot of other solutions in the market, not only providing the features of a CSPM, but also CNAPP."
"I'm not impressed with their support right now. Their support model is not really good."
"The tool needs to improve its documentation."
"Some cases in Rapid7 InsightCloudSec indicate that the log is not enough, as they mostly just generate alerts, and the synchronization between data connectors is often problematic, particularly in terms of not being in sync always, especially between the AD and Rapid7 alerts, which generates numerous false positives."
"The login piece needs improvement."
"Improvements could include providing better human-readable report formats with thorough explanations of CVEs and threats, detailing what can be done to eliminate malicious activities."
"Rapid7 InsightCloudSec could be better at showing dashboards for virtual firewalls and appliances. Compared to other solutions like Palo Alto, this area is not as good. So, they should work on improving this for virtual devices."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Companies generally buy this tool because the pricing is not that high."
"We're doing an annual subscription. There are additional expenses, but not within the confines of this platform."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Observability solutions are best for your needs.
894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Insurance Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
University
9%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Insurance Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise8
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rapid7 InsightCloudSec?
The pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Rapid7 InsightCloudSec are reasonable, and since our organization is growing, I have observed that the more numbers you have, the less costly the product ...
What needs improvement with Rapid7 InsightCloudSec?
I would say that because Rapid7 InsightCloudSec does not have automatic patching capabilities, it provides recommendations, but it does not execute anything from within Rapid7 InsightCloudSec. It h...
What is your primary use case for Rapid7 InsightCloudSec?
In my role, my main use case for Rapid7 InsightCloudSec is for vulnerability management, where I scan my machines to see zero-day vulnerabilities and receive remediation tactics recommended by Rapi...
 

Also Known As

No data available
DivvyCloud
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Fannie Mae, 3M, PizzaHut, Spotify, Autodesk, Discovery
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, SentinelOne and others in AI Observability. Updated: May 2026.
894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.