No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Aranda Patch Management vs Qualys Patch Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Aranda Patch Management
Ranking in Patch Management
45th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Qualys Patch Management
Ranking in Patch Management
1st
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
54
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of Aranda Patch Management is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qualys Patch Management is 2.8%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Patch Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Qualys Patch Management2.8%
Aranda Patch Management0.6%
Other96.6%
Patch Management
 

Featured Reviews

Use Aranda Patch Management?
Leave a review
SangramGupta - PeerSpot reviewer
Security Consultant at Deloitte
Automated patching has transformed risk-based remediation and now optimizes security workflows
I can highlight two areas for improvement. The first is better reporting flexibility and dashboard customization. Qualys VMDR has a great dashboard that I can customize, but Qualys Patch Management does not have a specific dashboard associated only with patch management and patch compliance. The customization could be improved significantly. The second area is third-party application coverage. Qualys Patch Management works very effectively when patching servers, internal servers, Windows, iOS, or Linux servers. However, when doing application security with third-party applications that require patches, it sometimes fails to complete the patch. The deployment issue with third-party applications needs enhancement, as even with integration, Qualys Patch Management is not able to deploy patches for some third-party applications. These are the two main points I can highlight for improvement.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
903,118 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
11%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business16
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise31
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys Patch Management?
The experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing for Qualys Patch Management has been straightforward without any complex difficulties. Support from Qualys Patch Management around licensing ...
What needs improvement with Qualys Patch Management?
Qualys Patch Management has room for improvement regarding certain blockages and error reporting; if a patch fails, it often lacks accurate detail on why the failure occurred, necessitating manual ...
What is your primary use case for Qualys Patch Management?
Qualys Patch Management serves as both a vulnerability identification tool and a patching tool in our organization. We initially used it for vulnerability identification, and then expanded to using...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Grupo Aval, Credomatic, Zurich, Redeban, Interbanking, Cooperativa, Insurance Caracas, ACH, Mapfre, Sofisa Bank, Public Services of Heredia, Buenos Aires waters, Western Union, Pacific Airport Group, KPMG, Transantiago
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Qualys, Microsoft, NinjaOne and others in Patch Management. Updated: June 2026.
903,118 professionals have used our research since 2012.