OpenText Diagnostics vs Splunk AppDynamics comparison

OpenText and Splunk are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. OpenText is ranked #64, while Splunk is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.3. OpenText holds a 0.3% mindshare in APM, compared to Splunk’s 4.0% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Splunk users who would recommend it.

OpenText Diagnostics

Read 4 OpenText Diagnostics reviews

541 Views
530 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Splunk AppDynamics

Read 252 Splunk AppDynamics reviews

12,248 Views
9,676 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

OpenText Diagnostics

Splunk AppDynamics

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 17, 2025

OpenText Diagnostics and Splunk AppDynamics operate in the diagnostics and monitoring domain. OpenText Diagnostics is favored for its cost-effectiveness and support, while Splunk AppDynamics has an edge with advanced features and extensive services, justifying its higher price.

Features:OpenText Diagnostics includes data analytics tools, customizable dashboards, and efficient monitoring of application diagnostics. Splunk AppDynamics provides comprehensive application performance management, detailed reporting, and in-depth analysis capabilities. Its advanced features make it well-suited for businesses needing extensive diagnostics.

Room for Improvement:OpenText Diagnostics could improve its advanced monitoring capabilities. More intuitive dashboards and enhanced reporting would offer better insights. Splunk AppDynamics could simplify deployment and reduce the complexity of its extensive feature set. Offering tiered pricing might attract more cost-sensitive users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:OpenText Diagnostics allows for quick deployment and is supported by a strong customer service framework. Splunk AppDynamics, in contrast, requires more effort for deployment due to its comprehensive offerings, but compensates with excellent customer service and in-depth instructions to ease the process.

Pricing and ROI:OpenText Diagnostics is well-regarded for its competitive pricing, appealing to businesses that seek a high return on investment without a significant upfront cost. Splunk AppDynamics demands higher initial expenses but delivers superior returns through its robust analysis and feature-rich platform, ideal for organizations pursuing deep insights.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Diagnostics vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Diagnostics vs. Splunk AppDynamics

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,676 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Diagnostics

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

64th

Average Rating

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Splunk AppDynamics

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

252

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (5th), IT Operations Analytics (2nd), Mobile APM (1st), Container Monitoring (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of OpenText Diagnostics is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk AppDynamics is 4.0%, down from 5.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Splunk AppDynamics	4.0%
OpenText Diagnostics	0.3%
Other	95.7%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Ravi Suvvari

Performance and Fault-tolerance Architect with 1,001-5,000 employees

Very good for transaction level monitoring, but expensive and HP needs better support and training

HP Diagnostics is a very good monitoring tool especially for transaction level monitoring -- it shows hot spots which can be drilled down to DB level, table, query, SP's, record and field level and also at Object level, Classes level,method or Augment levels instead of pinpointing bottlenecks at layer level it goes deep inside for information. It has very good tracing capabilities despite being an agent based tool compared to other agent less monitoring tools. Overall a very good tool for monitoring application diagnostics for quick and easy resolution with help of thread information. Drills down from slow, end-user transactions to the bottle necked component, method, or SQL statement, helping to solve memory, exception, and other common problems Key features and benefits • Automatically detects all components touched by a business process and traces them with no user intervention • Provides complete application visibility across the application lifecycle, enabling higher application quality when applications go live • Reduces mean time to resolution (MTTR) in your J2EE, .NET, ERP, or CRM (SAP, Oracle®, PeopleSoft) environment • Integrates fully with HP Business Availability Center software, HP LoadRunner, and HP Performance Center.

Read full review

Gyanesh Rahatekar

Back office at Reliance Industries Ltd

Application performance management and error resolution improved with data-driven insights

Dynatrace has multiple functions compared to Splunk AppDynamics, so Splunk AppDynamics should add those functions, which are not available as of now. Dynatrace has a universal agent that collects all information related to their CI, and if one CI has multiple languages, then there is no need to instrument multiple agents. However, Splunk AppDynamics requires multiple agents; if I have one server with multiple applications in different languages, then I need to instrument different agents for each application. Splunk AppDynamics should work with Dynatrace with one single universal agent that works with all application languages, eliminating the need for multiple implementations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The diagnostics and configuration are the solution's most valuable aspects."

"For banking and telecom solutions, it's been quite useful."

"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus Diagnostics is the information reported from an application that has timed out. For example, when you're Googling, or you're booking a ticket for Burj Khalifa here, the longest tower in the world, there are situations where the system can time out. There are times when you might not receive a response on the payment gateway or you are not able to find the reservation. The customer only receives the information that the session has timed out."

"Capacity planning is, in my opinion, the most useful."

"The most valuable feature is the detailed statistics, like the consumer count, for the ActiveMQ server."

"It's good for a larger scale deployment such as what my company is working on."

"We have been able to monitor our applications more accurately."

"AppDynamics' most valuable feature is Business iQ, which is based on analytics."

"Before we moved the code to AppDynamics, we had to compare the agile process and also had to make sure that they're following the standards."

"Data monitoring is the most valuable feature."

"The dashboards are very well-defined."

More Splunk AppDynamics pros

Cons

"The interface could be more user friendly."

"The interface is very old, and not very user-friendly. Most of our clients don't like the UI."

"The GUI and metrics of Micro Focus Diagnostics can be improved. The metrics the solution gathers can be limited and could be enhanced by giving more details."

"Installation and configuration can be very tough. An average user without specialized knowledge can't do this. You need to have DevOps and QA teams handle it. During installation, a lot of customers get stuck trying to track the database or the API part, and they have to contact customer support."

"Things are being done differently in the industry now, and many of these problems are being solved with cloud databases."

"Product-wise, everything is good, but the main concern is the extensions and their documentation, particularly for the installation of Azure app services."

"I would like to see more artificial intelligence and machine learning brought in to monitor the statement and payment sum issues we have."

"The AppDynamics installation process needs to be more straightforward. Deploying the product is also tricky."

"The setup, implementation and use are clumsy and need to be refined."

"The product's drawback is the licensing pricing. It could be better."

"There needs to be an option to capture all the sessions for all the users, not just samplings."

More Splunk AppDynamics cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The licensing scheme is very complex. They need to make it easier."

"AppDynamics Server Monitoring is an expensive solution."

"The tool is expensive."

"This price of this product is expensive."

"In terms of pricing, I feel that when you compare the benefits that we get to the price that we paid, it is reasonable."

"The pricing is quite comparable to similar solutions in the market. All these solutions at the moment are cheap, but it is like paying for insurance; you pay insurance to avoid major damage."

"The product is a bit expensive compared to other tools."

"AppDynamics is what I would consider an enterprise-level solution. This means that it's a solution that is intended for use by larger organizations, while small or medium-sized businesses may find it difficult to afford. The number of agents required will also impact the pricing, and smaller companies may only be able to afford a limited number of agents. Essentially, the cost of the solution is not within the reach of every organization, and only some may be able to afford it."

More Splunk AppDynamics pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	54
Midsize Enterprise	36
Large Enterprise	188

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

See all answers

APM tools for a Managed Service Provider - Dynatrace vs. AppDynamics vs. Aternity vs. Ruxit

Hi Avi! It's great to see your thorough approach to selecting an APM package for your MSP company. Considering your focus on SMBs and enterprises in Israel, Dynatrace seems like a solid choice with...

See all answers

What do you like most about AppDynamics?

The solution saves time and cost.

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs OpenText Diagnostics

Compared 32% of the time

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs OpenText Diagnostics

Compared 20% of the time

Correlsense SharePath vs OpenText Diagnostics

Compared 15% of the time

Omnipliance vs OpenText Diagnostics

Compared 13% of the time

More OpenText Diagnostics Competitors

Dynatrace vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 14% of the time

Datadog vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 9% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 8% of the time

New Relic vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 8% of the time

Grafana vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 4% of the time

More Splunk AppDynamics Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

August 2025

Download OpenText Diagnostics product report

Buyer's Guide

Splunk AppDynamics

August 2025

Download Splunk AppDynamics product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Diagnostics, MF Diagnostics

No data available

Overview

Diagnostics software monitors application transaction health in traditional, virtualized and cloud environments allowing quick isolation and resolution of issues. It gives you a common tool to easily collaborate across the entire application lifecycle and release higher-quality applications. Diagnostics software provides deep drill down into transactions from the end user through the back end. And it uniquely serves as a single tool set for pre-production and production to diagnose application performance bottlenecks quickly and improve quality.

OpenText

Splunk AppDynamics enhances application performance monitoring with advanced diagnostics and real-time insights, offering seamless end-to-end transaction tracking and infrastructure visibility.

AppDynamics provides critical tools for businesses to analyze application behavior and performance. Through innovative features like transaction snapshot analysis and adaptable dashboards, users can quickly identify and address issues, ensuring high levels of system uptime and efficiency. It is designed to support complex environments including Kubernetes and AWS, enhancing user experience by detecting performance issues early. Despite needing improvements in network monitoring and integration, it remains a robust option for tracking application health.

What are the key features of AppDynamics?

Real-time Performance Monitoring: Offers immediate insights into application behavior.
Business Transaction Tracking: Tracks transactions from start to finish for bottleneck identification.
JVM Memory Monitoring: Provides detailed JVM metrics and memory use information.
Deep-dive Diagnostics: Enables in-depth analysis of code and stack traces.
Adaptable Dashboards: Customizable views for better data interpretation.

How does AppDynamics benefit users?

Improved Incident Resolution: Faster problem detection and solution implementation.
Enhanced Application Performance: Real-time monitoring optimizes system operations.
Comprehensive Visibility: Provides a full view of application infrastructure.
Informed Decision Making: Detailed analytics guide performance improvements.
Customer Satisfaction: Enhances user experience through faster issue resolutions.

In industries like financial services and e-commerce, AppDynamics facilitates performance tracking across distributed systems, optimizing infrastructure to meet consumer demands. It excels in environments needing precise transaction monitoring and is pivotal in delivering high value and satisfaction.

Splunk

Sample Customers

BSkyB, Alior Bank

Cisco, Sony, Nasdaq, Reserve Bank of New Zealand, Edmunds.com, Puma, Fox News, DirecTV, Pizza Hut, T-Systems, Cornell University, OpenTable, BITMARCK, Green Mountain Power, Care.com, Overstock, Paddy Power, eHarmony, Kraft, The Motley Fool, The Container Store, and more See more customers

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Diagnostics vs. Splunk AppDynamics

September 2025

Free Report: OpenText Diagnostics vs. Splunk AppDynamics

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Diagnostics vs. Splunk AppDynamics and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Diagnostics vs. Splunk AppDynamics report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.