Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Diagnostics vs Splunk AppDynamics comparison

OpenText and Splunk are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. OpenText is ranked #62, while Splunk is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.3. OpenText holds a 0.2% mindshare in APM, compared to Splunk’s 4.6% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Splunk users who would recommend it.
OpenText Diagnostics
Read 4 OpenText Diagnostics reviews
  • 442 Views
  • 260 Comparison Views
75% willing to recommend
Splunk AppDynamics
Read 249 Splunk AppDynamics reviews
  • 11,994 Views
  • 6,410 Comparison Views
91% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on May 11, 2025

OpenText Diagnostics and Splunk AppDynamics compete in the application performance management category. Splunk AppDynamics seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced features that provide deeper insights into application health and a high ROI, justifying its higher cost.

Features: OpenText Diagnostics is recognized for its robust troubleshooting capabilities, in-depth performance tracking, and stack trace visibility during problem detection. Splunk AppDynamics provides comprehensive analytics, real-time monitoring, and automatic baselining of application performance for alerting to deviations. Its operational dashboards and transaction scorecards contribute to a well-rounded feature set.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Diagnostics could benefit from enhanced cloud integration, improved real-time analytics, and user interface modernization. Splunk AppDynamics requires simpler deployment processes, improved customer service communication channels, and more intuitive configuration options for business transaction monitoring.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Diagnostics is known for its straightforward deployment and reliable customer service, simplifying the implementation process. In contrast, Splunk AppDynamics offers more complex deployment procedures but balances this with extensive support resources. Its deployment challenges are often offset by valuable insights that tech-savvy teams can leverage with provided support.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Diagnostics is appealing for budget-conscious organizations with its lower setup cost. However, Splunk AppDynamics, despite its higher initial investment, offers a feature-rich set that significantly improves ROI over time. Organizations investing in AppDynamics find its advanced capabilities justify the cost, delivering greater long-term value.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Diagnostics vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Diagnostics vs. Splunk AppDynamics
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 859,579 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Diagnostics
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
62nd
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Splunk AppDynamics
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
249
Ranking in other categories
IT Infrastructure Monitoring (5th), IT Operations Analytics (2nd), Mobile APM (1st), Container Monitoring (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of OpenText Diagnostics is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk AppDynamics is 4.6%, down from 6.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

RS
Very good for transaction level monitoring, but expensive and HP needs better support and training
HP Diagnostics is a very good monitoring tool especially for transaction level monitoring -- it shows hot spots which can be drilled down to DB level, table, query, SP's, record and field level and also at Object level, Classes level,method or Augment levels instead of pinpointing bottlenecks at layer level it goes deep inside for information. It has very good tracing capabilities despite being an agent based tool compared to other agent less monitoring tools. Overall a very good tool for monitoring application diagnostics for quick and easy resolution with help of thread information. Drills down from slow, end-user transactions to the bottle necked component, method, or SQL statement, helping to solve memory, exception, and other common problems Key features and benefits • Automatically detects all components touched by a business process and traces them with no user intervention • Provides complete application visibility across the application lifecycle, enabling higher application quality when applications go live • Reduces mean time to resolution (MTTR) in your J2EE, .NET, ERP, or CRM (SAP, Oracle®, PeopleSoft) environment • Integrates fully with HP Business Availability Center software, HP LoadRunner, and HP Performance Center.
Read full review
Gyanesh Rahatekar - PeerSpot reviewer
Application performance management and error resolution improved with data-driven insights
Dynatrace has multiple functions compared to Splunk AppDynamics, so Splunk AppDynamics should add those functions, which are not available as of now. Dynatrace has a universal agent that collects all information related to their CI, and if one CI has multiple languages, then there is no need to instrument multiple agents. However, Splunk AppDynamics requires multiple agents; if I have one server with multiple applications in different languages, then I need to instrument different agents for each application. Splunk AppDynamics should work with Dynatrace with one single universal agent that works with all application languages, eliminating the need for multiple implementations.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The diagnostics and configuration are the solution's most valuable aspects."
"For banking and telecom solutions, it's been quite useful."
"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus Diagnostics is the information reported from an application that has timed out. For example, when you're Googling, or you're booking a ticket for Burj Khalifa here, the longest tower in the world, there are situations where the system can time out. There are times when you might not receive a response on the payment gateway or you are not able to find the reservation. The customer only receives the information that the session has timed out."
"Knowing which tables on the database were working the most was valuable. It helped the client understand where they need to focus. They streamlined a lot of their queries and brought the resource usage down. It helped them to find long-running queries. They rewrote them completely so that they don't take as long and the application performs better."
"The transaction snapshots let you find out where the application broke; it pinpoints where in the call stack, and then how long it took to resolve."
"The AppDyniamics technical support is good. We haven't had any problems with them. They answer very quickly."
"End-user monitoring (web and mobile)"
"In the case of a mobile banking application, AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring successfully reduced the response time from eight seconds to just one second. In another example, the tool identified an issue within the mobile app, causing lost transactions in the billing system."
"In my experience, it's easy to use. There's nothing complex to learn or fear. You can quickly adapt to it without the need for extensive training."
"Application Analytics' most valuable features are the real-user monitoring and the agents installed in the software stack on the application server."
"AppDynamics' most valuable feature is Business iQ, which is based on analytics."
More Splunk AppDynamics pros
 

Cons

"The interface could be more user friendly."
"The GUI and metrics of Micro Focus Diagnostics can be improved. The metrics the solution gathers can be limited and could be enhanced by giving more details."
"The interface is very old, and not very user-friendly. Most of our clients don't like the UI."
"The configuration is tricky and requires a lot of tools."
"As per my experience, the drill-down feature can be improved at the class level."
"I would like to see more of a unified platform. They're very, very new on the server side, machine agents. I want them to be more mature in this area."
"They are using Flash for their website, which is very slow. We had hoped the website would be much faster to use, and that is definitely what we want to see."
"Additional support for NextGen mobile platforms also needs to be high in the roadmap prioritizations"
"The solution has performance issues after we deploy the agent."
"Needs more integration with applications suites, like Oracle Enterprise Server or BMC Remedy."
"The UI could use a little help."
More Splunk AppDynamics cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"AppDynamics does not usually do monthly payments. They do it on an annual basis, at the very least."
"AppDynamics is really pricey as it requires licenses for every feature."
"The price of AppDynamics could be reduced in my region."
"AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring does have licensing cost associated with it."
"It would be better if there were more solutions incorporated into the base price. ​"
"Yearly payments have to be made toward the licensing costs of the solution. The solution has no additional costs apart from the licensing costs."
"The pricing model for AppDynamics could be better. You have to subscribe to a yearly or a three-year licensing, which isn't very handy. The solution is one of the most expensive in the market today."
"AppDynamics is one of the most expensive solutions on the market."
More Splunk AppDynamics pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
859,579 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
24%
Educational Organization
20%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Any advice about APM solutions?
There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...
See all answers
APM tools for a Managed Service Provider - Dynatrace vs. AppDynamics vs. Aternity vs. Ruxit
Hi Avi! It's great to see your thorough approach to selecting an APM package for your MSP company. Considering your focus on SMBs and enterprises in Israel, Dynatrace seems like a solid choice with...
See all answers
What do you like most about AppDynamics?
The solution saves time and cost.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs OpenText Diagnostics Logo
Dynatrace vs OpenText Diagnostics
Compared 43% of the time
Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs OpenText Diagnostics Logo
Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs OpenText Diagnostics
Compared 24% of the time
More OpenText Diagnostics Competitors
Dynatrace vs Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Dynatrace vs Splunk AppDynamics
Compared 15% of the time
Datadog vs Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Datadog vs Splunk AppDynamics
Compared 9% of the time
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Splunk AppDynamics
Compared 8% of the time
New Relic vs Splunk AppDynamics Logo
New Relic vs Splunk AppDynamics
Compared 8% of the time
Grafana vs Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Grafana vs Splunk AppDynamics
Compared 5% of the time
More Splunk AppDynamics Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
June 2025
OpenText Diagnostics reportDownload OpenText Diagnostics product report
Buyer's Guide
Splunk AppDynamics
June 2025
Splunk AppDynamics reportDownload Splunk AppDynamics product report
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus Diagnostics, MF Diagnostics
No data available
 

Overview

Diagnostics software monitors application transaction health in traditional, virtualized and cloud environments allowing quick isolation and resolution of issues. It gives you a common tool to easily collaborate across the entire application lifecycle and release higher-quality applications. Diagnostics software provides deep drill down into transactions from the end user through the back end. And it uniquely serves as a single tool set for pre-production and production to diagnose application performance bottlenecks quickly and improve quality.
OpenText

Splunk AppDynamics enhances application performance monitoring with advanced diagnostics and real-time insights, offering seamless end-to-end transaction tracking and infrastructure visibility.

AppDynamics provides critical tools for businesses to analyze application behavior and performance. Through innovative features like transaction snapshot analysis and adaptable dashboards, users can quickly identify and address issues, ensuring high levels of system uptime and efficiency. It is designed to support complex environments including Kubernetes and AWS, enhancing user experience by detecting performance issues early. Despite needing improvements in network monitoring and integration, it remains a robust option for tracking application health.

What are the key features of AppDynamics?
  • Real-time Performance Monitoring: Offers immediate insights into application behavior.
  • Business Transaction Tracking: Tracks transactions from start to finish for bottleneck identification.
  • JVM Memory Monitoring: Provides detailed JVM metrics and memory use information.
  • Deep-dive Diagnostics: Enables in-depth analysis of code and stack traces.
  • Adaptable Dashboards: Customizable views for better data interpretation.
How does AppDynamics benefit users?
  • Improved Incident Resolution: Faster problem detection and solution implementation.
  • Enhanced Application Performance: Real-time monitoring optimizes system operations.
  • Comprehensive Visibility: Provides a full view of application infrastructure.
  • Informed Decision Making: Detailed analytics guide performance improvements.
  • Customer Satisfaction: Enhances user experience through faster issue resolutions.

In industries like financial services and e-commerce, AppDynamics facilitates performance tracking across distributed systems, optimizing infrastructure to meet consumer demands. It excels in environments needing precise transaction monitoring and is pivotal in delivering high value and satisfaction.

Splunk
 

Sample Customers

BSkyB, Alior Bank
Cisco, Sony, Nasdaq, Reserve Bank of New Zealand, Edmunds.com, Puma, Fox News, DirecTV, Pizza Hut, T-Systems, Cornell University, OpenTable, BITMARCK, Green Mountain Power, Care.com, Overstock, Paddy Power, eHarmony, Kraft, The Motley Fool, The Container Store, and more See more customers
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Diagnostics vs. Splunk AppDynamics
June 2025
Free Report: OpenText Diagnostics vs. Splunk AppDynamics
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Diagnostics vs. Splunk AppDynamics and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
859,579 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our OpenText Diagnostics vs. Splunk AppDynamics report.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.