Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS Auto Scaling vs Splunk AppDynamics comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 17, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS Auto Scaling
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
15th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Splunk AppDynamics
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
250
Ranking in other categories
IT Infrastructure Monitoring (5th), IT Operations Analytics (2nd), Mobile APM (1st), Container Monitoring (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of AWS Auto Scaling is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk AppDynamics is 4.6%, down from 5.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

Mbula Mboma - PeerSpot reviewer
Boosts deployment efficiency with seamless automatic scaling capabilities
My primary use case for Auto Scaling is mainly to deploy applications at scale Auto Scaling has made the deployment of applications more efficient, allowing us to manage traffic and maintain performance as user counts increase. Auto Scaling is a cool feature that works well and its automatic…
Gyanesh Rahatekar - PeerSpot reviewer
Application performance management and error resolution improved with data-driven insights
Dynatrace has multiple functions compared to Splunk AppDynamics, so Splunk AppDynamics should add those functions, which are not available as of now. Dynatrace has a universal agent that collects all information related to their CI, and if one CI has multiple languages, then there is no need to instrument multiple agents. However, Splunk AppDynamics requires multiple agents; if I have one server with multiple applications in different languages, then I need to instrument different agents for each application. Splunk AppDynamics should work with Dynatrace with one single universal agent that works with all application languages, eliminating the need for multiple implementations.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The setup is not very complex."
"It helps us to reduce the cost."
"Auto Scaling is a cool feature that works well and its automatic scaling capabilities are very useful."
"The solution helps optimize the cost of the AWS environment."
"AWS Auto Scaling is very good for managing traffic and creating new instances when necessary."
"AWS Auto Scaling is very good for managing traffic and creating new instances when necessary."
"The solution's monitoring effectively monitors our application and CPU utilization."
"Our internal business applications are hosted in AWS Auto Scaling."
"It is a stable solution that helps address user issues well."
"There are many features that are very valuable to us, but the ability to monitor the status of the users' experience in real-time is one of them."
"The solution helps us provide a better user experience to our customers."
"It helped to find quick solutions for specific business transactions."
"The most valuable feature is having our services being available and healthy."
"The platform is reliable in identifying the core system issues."
"It provides everything into one view, so we can track information from one place to another."
"What I like best about AppDynamics is that it's functional, particularly in APM in Java and .NET."
 

Cons

"It requires a downtime before deploying the Auto Scaling group."
"There hasn't been a need for improvements."
"The tool must include AI features."
"Setting up the configuration involves too much work for the cloud engineer."
"It could be cheaper."
"The solution is not out-of-the-box and you have to study to use it. It should be more easier to use."
"The product could add more features for managing instances."
"The speed of the solution must be improved."
"There are too many installers available for this solution."
"AppDynamics's agent management could be improved."
"One aspect that requires improvement is the agent. Without an agent, gathering sufficient information on applications is challenging."
"If you have a single URL and all the operations are coming in as part of the header, you will not be able to segregate them for different actions."
"The worst part is that the AppDynamics SaaS Environment has a lot of downtimes, and AppDynamics, despite our efforts, does not give us any feedback on these downtimes/incidents."
"Customization requires a few manual tweaks."
"The product lost its place as an industry leader."
"The major concern lies with reports, specifically their configurability. It's like, if I want to combine multiple reports and generate them all at once, that's not possible. Even though there's a setup for generating 25 reports, I wanted to group them all and generate them in one go, which isn't currently feasible. I have to manually run each report and set the time for it."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS Auto Scaling is an expensive solution."
"The pricing is good. I have not had any customers that have complained about the price."
"AWS Auto Scaling is a cheap solution."
"The product has moderate pricing."
"AWS Auto Scaling's price is high."
"The product is expensive."
"AWS Auto Scaling is a pay-per-use and pay-as-you-use service."
"Purchasing the product through the AWS Marketplace was good."
"There is an annual cost for the use of this solution."
"We have two different licensing models for this solution. One of them is the agent based model, which requires payment per agent. The other is an infrastructure based model, where the price is based on the CPU core. For the infrastructure model wholesale level pricing applies. All of the up to date licensing prices for this product are available on the manufacturers website."
"There is no standard license instead, the license is adapted to the organization's requirements."
"The product’s licencing policy is competitive. However, properly identify and size your needs to get the best rate."
"We find its pricing reasonable and competitive. After it was acquired by Cisco, we found it acceptable."
"In terms of pricing, I feel that when you compare the benefits that we get to the price that we paid, it is reasonable."
"I was not involved with the procurement of AppDynamic, but I believe it's expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
865,140 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
29%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS Auto Scaling?
The tool's most valuable feature is vertical auto-scaling, which is easy to use. However, most companies now prefer horizontal scaling. I set up the health check integration to monitor CPU usage. W...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Auto Scaling?
The pricing of Auto Scaling is medium range, neither high nor low.
What needs improvement with AWS Auto Scaling?
It is sometimes very critical to deploy on AWS since some servers are already running in the background. There are challenges for employees on how to deploy at a given time. It requires a downtime ...
Any advice about APM solutions?
There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...
APM tools for a Managed Service Provider - Dynatrace vs. AppDynamics vs. Aternity vs. Ruxit
Hi Avi! It's great to see your thorough approach to selecting an APM package for your MSP company. Considering your focus on SMBs and enterprises in Israel, Dynatrace seems like a solid choice with...
 

Also Known As

AWS Auto-Scaling
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
Cisco, Sony, Nasdaq, Reserve Bank of New Zealand, Edmunds.com, Puma, Fox News, DirecTV, Pizza Hut, T-Systems, Cornell University, OpenTable, BITMARCK, Green Mountain Power, Care.com, Overstock, Paddy Power, eHarmony, Kraft, The Motley Fool, The Container Store, and more See more customers
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Auto Scaling vs. Splunk AppDynamics and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
865,140 professionals have used our research since 2012.