Anomali vs Devo comparison

Anomali and Devo are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Anomali is ranked #34 with an average rating of 9.0, while Devo is ranked #26 with an average rating of 8.5. Anomali holds a 0.2% mindshare in SIEM, compared to Devo’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of Anomali users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Devo users who would recommend it.

Anomali

Read 3 Anomali reviews

336 Views
221 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Devo

Read 22 Devo reviews

2,078 Views
1,007 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Anomali

Devo

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 1, 2025

Anomali and Devo are competitive solutions in the cybersecurity domain. Devo has the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set, superior scalability, and advanced analytics, despite Anomali's advantages in pricing and support.

Features: Anomali offers strong threat detection, robust integration capabilities, and effective threat analysis. Devo provides advanced analytics, superior scalability, and comprehensive data management, emphasizing a broader feature application that surpasses Anomali.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Anomali's straightforward deployment is complemented by responsive customer service. Devo's deployment is more complex but is balanced by effective support ensuring smooth transitions and comprehensive assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Anomali is known for lower setup costs and quicker ROI, making it appealing for those prioritizing cost-effectiveness. Devo requires higher initial investment but offers substantial ROI in the long term due to its enhanced capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Anomali vs. Devo Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Anomali vs. Devo

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,236 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Anomali

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

34th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (18th), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (22nd), Threat Intelligence Platforms (7th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (27th)

Devo

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

26th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (27th), IT Operations Analytics (6th), AIOps (17th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Anomali is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Devo is 1.1%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

Sai Puneeth Gundamraju

Senior Cyber Threat Hunter at Fiserv

Effective threat modeling and intelligence prioritization streamline threat hunting

An area for improvement is the intelligence sharing within the Anomali community. The tagging system can be inconsistent, as any company can use any tags for their reporting. Combining all aliases into a coherent solution would be beneficial, as we had to review each individual source ourselves. This would improve intelligence collection across Anomali.

Read full review

Michael Wenn

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

Has cloud-first architecture with SIEM technology to run security operations

When it comes to scale, they're architected quite well. They handle some of the biggest customers globally, with significant throughput on their platform, managing thousands of customers. One of the most impressive aspects of Devo is its customer community. A large majority, over 80 percent of their customers, actively participate on a Devo-specific community page. They're contributing to product development and support, events, and user group information, helping each other out. This high level of engagement is rare and demonstrates both the loyalty of their customer base and the quality of their product. They offer a range of small, medium, and large options to cater to everyone. I sold Devo products while working with them, focusing on enterprise solutions. However, as a small reseller, my customers were typically smaller businesses. I rate the solution's scalability a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The feature I have found most valuable is credential monitoring. This feature is easy and quick."

"I have found Cyber threat intelligence (CTI) very useful and concise. The solution is easy to use."

"The most valuable aspect of Anomali is the threat modeling capability."

"Those 400 days of hot data mean that people can look for trends and at what happened in the past. And they can not only do so from a security point of view, but even for operational use cases. In the past, our operational norm was to keep live data for only 30 days. Our users were constantly asking us for at least 90 days, and we really couldn't even do that. That's one reason that having 400 days of live data is pretty huge. As our users start to use it and adopt this system, we expect people to be able to do those long-term analytics."

"The most useful feature for us, because of some of the issues we had previously, was the simplicity of log integrations. It's much easier with this platform to integrate log sources that might not have standard logging and things like that."

"The most valuable feature is definitely the ability that Devo has to ingest data. From the previous SIEM that I came from and helped my company administer, it really was the type of system where data was parsed on ingest. This meant that if you didn't build the parser efficiently or correctly, sometimes that would bring the system to its knees. You'd have a backlog of processing the logs as it was ingesting them."

"The most powerful feature is the way the data is stored and extracted. The data is always stored in its original format and you can normalize the data after it has been stored."

"In traditional BI solutions, you need to wait a lot of time to have the ability to create visualizations with the data and to do searches. With this kind of platform, you have that information in real-time."

"The most valuable feature is that it has native MSSP capabilities and maintains perfect data separation. It does all of that in a very easy-to-manage cloud-based solution."

"The user experience [is] well thought out and the workflows are logical. The dashboards are intuitive and highly customizable."

"Being able to build and modify dashboards on the fly with Activeboards streamlines my analyst time because my analysts aren't doing it across spreadsheets or five different tools to try to build a timeline out themselves. They can just ingest it all, build a timeline out across all the logging, and all the different information sources in one dashboard. So, it's a huge time saver. It also has the accuracy of being able to look at all those data sources in one view. The log analysis, which would take 40 hours, we can probably get through it in about five to eight hours using Devo."

More Devo pros

Cons

"An area for improvement is the intelligence sharing within the Anomali community. The tagging system can be inconsistent, as any company can use any tags for their reporting."

"Less code in integration would be nice when building blocks."

"A lot of tools can give you many features, such as CTI intelligence and a tax service reduction. However, many people are combining different tools together to have more capabilities. It is up to the consumer whether they want to have multiple tools or have one tool that serves the purpose. Anomali Enterprise could improve by combining all the other tools' features into one solution."

"Some of the documentation could be improved a little bit. A lot of times it doesn't go as deep into some of the critical issues you might run into. They've been really good to shore us up with support, but some of the documentation could be a little bit better."

"Devo has a lot of cloud connectors, but they need to do a little bit of work there. They've got good integrations with the public cloud, but there are a lot of cloud SaaS systems that they still need to work with on integrations, such as Salesforce and other SaaS providers where we need to get access logs."

"Some basic reporting mechanisms have room for improvement. Customers can do analysis by building Activeboards, Devo’s name for interactive dashboards. This capability is quite nice, but it is not a reporting engine. Devo does provide mechanisms to allow third-party tools to query data via their API, which is great. However, a lot of folks like or want a reporting engine, per se, and Devo simply doesn't have that. This may or may not be by design."

"The biggest area with room for improvement in Devo is the Security Operations module that just isn't there yet. That goes back to building out how they're going to do content and larger correlation and aggregation of data across multiple things, as well as natively ingesting CTI to create rule sets."

"The price is one problem with Devo."

"From our experience, the Devo agent needs some work. They built it on top of OS Query's open-source framework. It seems like it wasn't tuned properly to handle a large volume of Windows event logs. In our experience, there would definitely be some room for improvement. A lot of SIEMs on the market have their own agent infrastructure. I think Devo's working towards that, but I think that it needs some improvement as far as keeping up with high-volume environments."

"There's always room to reduce the learning curve over how to deal with events and machine data. They could make the machine data simpler."

"The overall performance of extraction could be a lot faster, but that's a common problem in this space in general. Also, the stock or default alerting and detecting options could definitely be broader and more all-encompassing. The fact that they're not is why we had to write all our own alerts."

More Devo cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When comparing the price of Anomali Enterprise to other solutions it is in the medium to high range. However, I am satisfied with the price."

"It's very competitive. That was also a primary draw for us. Some of the licensing models with solutions like Splunk and Sentinel were attractive upfront, but there were so many micro-charges and services we would've had to add on to make them what we wanted. We had to include things like SOAR and extended capabilities, whereas all those capabilities are completely included with the Devo platform. I haven't seen any additional fee."

"The way Devo prices things is based on the amount of data, and I wish the tiers had more granularity. Maybe at this point they do, but when we first negotiated with them, there were only three or four tiers."

"Devo is a hosted or subscription-based solution, whereas before, we purchased QRadar, so we owned it and just had to pay a maintenance fee. We've encountered this with some other products, too, where we went over to subscription-based. Our thought process is that with subscription based, the provider hosts and maintains the tool, and it's offsite. That comes with some additional fees, but we were able to convince our upper management it was worth the price. We used to pay under 10k a year for maintenance, and now we're paying ten times that. It was a relatively tough sell to our management, but I wonder if we have a choice anymore; this is where the market is."

"I like the pricing very much. They keep it simple. It is a single price based on data ingested, and they do it on an average. If you get a spike of data that flows in, they will not stick it to you or charge you for that. They are very fair about that."

"Our licensing fees are billed annually and per terabyte."

"Be cautious of metadata inclusion for log types in pricing, as there are some "gotchas" with that."

"Devo is definitely cheaper than Splunk. There's no doubt about that. The value from Devo is good. It's definitely more valuable to me than QRadar or LogRhythm or any of the old, traditional SIEMs."

"Pricing is based on the number of gigabytes of ingestion by volume, and it's on a 30-day average. If you go over one day, that's not a big deal as long as the average is what you expected it to be."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

15%

University

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Devo?

Devo has a really good website for creating custom configurations.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

Compared to Splunk or SentinelOne, it is really expensive. I rate the product’s pricing a nine out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Devo?

They can improve their AI capabilities. If you look at some integrations like XDR or AI, which add to the platform to correlate situations in events, there are areas for enhancement. For instance, ...

See all answers

Comparisons

ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) vs Anomali

Compared 27% of the time

ThreatQ vs Anomali

Compared 19% of the time

Recorded Future vs Anomali

Compared 18% of the time

Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence vs Anomali

Compared 7% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Anomali

Compared 7% of the time

More Anomali Competitors

IBM Security QRadar vs Devo

Compared 17% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 17% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Devo

Compared 16% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 6% of the time

Wazuh vs Devo

Compared 6% of the time

More Devo Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Threat Intelligence Platforms

April 2025

Download Anomali product report

Buyer's Guide

Devo

May 2025

Download Devo product report

Also Known As

Match, Lens, ThreatStream, STAXX, Anomali Security Analytics

No data available

Overview

Anomali delivers advanced threat intelligence solutions designed to enhance security operations by providing comprehensive visibility into threats and enabling real-time threat detection and management.

Anomali stands out in threat intelligence, offering an innovative platform that integrates data to identify and analyze threats effectively. It enables teams to streamline threat detection processes and respond to incidents with increased agility. With a focus on accuracy and efficiency, Anomali supports cybersecurity professionals in making informed decisions to safeguard their networks consistently.

What are Anomali's core features?

ThreatStream: A platform that aggregates threat intelligence feeds to enhance threat assessment.
Match: An automated detection feature that matches internal log data against threat intelligence insights.
Link: Provides graphical visualization for threat analysis, helping to understand threat vectors better.
STAXX: A lightweight tool for collecting and analyzing open-source threat intelligence.

What are the key benefits and ROI of using Anomali?

Improved Threat Detection: Streamlined processes lead to faster identification and response to threats.
Resource Efficiency: Automation reduces manual tasks, allowing security teams to focus on strategic activities.
Better Decision Making: Provides actionable insights that enable more informed security strategies.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Anomali is implemented to address specific challenges like compliance and data protection. By using this platform, organizations gain the ability to adapt to evolving threats, ensuring robust and adaptable security postures tailored to industry demands.

Anomali

Devo is the only cloud-native logging and security analytics platform that releases the full potential of all your data to empower bold, confident action when it matters most. Only the Devo platform delivers the powerful combination of real-time visibility, high-performance analytics, scalability, multitenancy, and low TCO crucial for monitoring and securing business operations as enterprises accelerate their shift to the cloud.

Devo

Sample Customers

Bank of England, First Energy, UBISOFT, Bank of Hope, Blackhawk Network

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

Buyer's Guide

Anomali vs. Devo

April 2025

Free Report: Anomali vs. Devo

Find out what your peers are saying about Anomali vs. Devo and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Anomali vs. Devo report.

See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.