Dell ObjectScale and Amazon EFS are leading products in the storage solutions category. Dell ObjectScale stands out for its comprehensive integration within the Dell ecosystem, while Amazon EFS has an advantage in flexibility and scalability in cloud environments.
Features: Dell ObjectScale is renowned for its S3 protocol implementation and seamless integration with other Dell products, offering a fully integrated hardware and software solution. It boasts stability, scalability, and competitive pricing, making it ideal for managing large-scale unstructured data. Amazon EFS is recognized for its elasticity and auto-scaling capabilities. It supports easy integration with AWS services, facilitating seamless scaling without pre-provisioning and providing fast performance suitable for dynamic workloads.
Room for Improvement: Dell ObjectScale needs enhancements in write performance and better integration with third-party solutions. Users desire improved technical support and a comprehensive disaster recovery solution. Amazon EFS could improve Windows OS support and provide clearer pricing transparency. Users suggest enhancements in integration capabilities and performance to reduce latency.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Dell ObjectScale is primarily on-premises with local support that varies by region. Users report challenges in consistent support due to Dell and EMC's integration process. Amazon EFS, used mainly in public cloud settings, benefits from AWS's robust service continuity, but users note occasional performance issues and slow support response for complex problems.
Pricing and ROI: Dell ObjectScale is often seen as costly with bundled hardware and software pricing; however, it offers good long-term value through cost efficiency and scalability. Amazon EFS operates on a pay-as-you-go model, offering pricing flexibility, though it may be higher compared to other AWS storage options. Dell ObjectScale is perceived as having higher upfront costs with bundled components, while Amazon EFS provides a more flexible, consumption-based model, both delivering significant ROI.
It does not require much management once you set up correctly, so it saves time, allowing an admin to focus on other work.
I would rate them an eight out of ten.
The support is done through email and is not that great, making it a very problematic area I've been dealing with for over four years.
While the time to respond was good, the time to resolve was not optimal, as it took more than a week.
Amazon's support model is consistent across services.
Training and support depend on the plan you have, with centralized support being very helpful in case issues arise.
There is a lack of SUSE Linux experts which affects the level of support.
The response time and quality of the technical support are satisfactory.
Customer support is generally good but sometimes struggles with complex issues.
Pure Storage FlashBlade is scalable.
Its auto-scaling feature is a crucial point, providing high scalability that I would rate at ten out of ten.
Elastic File Systems allow me to scale up or down easily.
It is very cost-effective, and there's no need for initial charges.
Through the fabrics, it provides the clustering, allowing us to add nodes easily.
It allows scale-out processes by adding extra nodes, providing flexibility for customers to increase capacity on demand.
I would rate scalability between eight or nine, as it provides a good ability to scale and expand storage.
In case there is any issue with any blade, the data is moved to another.
Amazon EFS is extremely stable, as it is managed by AWS.
While I experienced an EFS mount dropping, it was related to server issues rather than EFS itself.
We have not experienced any outages in the last four years.
We use it in very critical areas inside Saudi Arabia with critical customers.
I'd rate stability maybe 9.5 out of ten.
Technical support definitely needs significant improvement.
Its configuration should be easier.
Enabling AI-driven or automatic features would be beneficial for new or nontechnical users.
In my project, there are challenges related to AWS, such as ensuring proper security measures with IMS code and encryption.
Live logs should be viewable through the GUI like with Logstash or Elasticsearch.
The deployment is not easy, and some expertise is required to configure the virtual data center and replication groups.
Incorporating extra integrations beyond S3, like Hadoop file systems, and being well aligned with trends like AI solutions would be beneficial.
The pricing of Pure Storage FlashBlade is expensive compared to other products I used from other companies in the past, but one benefit is that they have built-in ransomware protection.
EFS could cost around $30 to $50 per month for similar usage.
Amazon EFS is more costly compared to other storage options available from AWS.
Elastic File Systems can be expensive due to the nature of data transfer costs.
It relies on nearline SAS drives, which are cheaper than flash or SSDs.
The pricing model is on the higher side compared to other vendors.
The price is reasonable given the abundance of features, including managing, control, host resources, dockers, and containers.
We can plug in many blades, and we can have data up to one terabyte.
The best features of Pure Storage FlashBlade include better throughput and better performance.
Its ease of integration with other AWS services enhances our infrastructure, while the shared storage access improves reliability and processing continuity for our applications.
They help me process data while maintaining low latency, which is crucial for efficient data processing.
The most valuable feature of Amazon EFS is its auto-scaling capability.
The stability of this solution is a major advantage, as we've not experienced any outages in the last four years.
Dell ECS helps with managing storage requirements since it's S3 kind of object storage with all needed enterprise features such as immutability, snapshotting, and application management, which are nice sets of features usually required.
If we encounter any issues or need to upgrade anything, we can simply open a ticket, and the EMC team is there to assist us.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
Dell ObjectScale | 7.3% |
Pure Storage FlashBlade | 5.7% |
Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) | 0.9% |
Other | 86.1% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 11 |
Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
Large Enterprise | 20 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 6 |
Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
Large Enterprise | 7 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 12 |
Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
Large Enterprise | 11 |
FlashBlade is the industry’s most advanced scale-out storage for unstructured data, powered by a modern, massively parallel architecture to consolidate complex data silos (like backup appliances and data lakes) and accelerate tomorrow’s discoveries and insights.
Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) provides simple, scalable file storage for use with Amazon EC2 instances in the AWS Cloud. Amazon EFS is easy to use and offers a simple interface that allows you to create and configure file systems quickly and easily. With Amazon EFS, storage capacity is elastic, growing and shrinking automatically as you add and remove files, so your applications have the storage they need, when they need it.
When mounted to Amazon EC2 instances, an Amazon EFS file system provides a standard file system interface and file system access semantics, allowing you to seamlessly integrate Amazon EFS with your existing applications and tools. Multiple Amazon EC2 instances can access an Amazon EFS file system at the same time, allowing Amazon EFS to provide a common data source for workloads and applications running on more than one Amazon EC2 instance.
It’s designed for high availability and durability, and provides performance for a broad spectrum of workloads and applications, including Big Data and analytics, media processing workflows, content management, web serving, and home directories.
Dell ObjectScale is a next-generation S3 object storage platform known for scalability, performance, and efficiency. It integrates with Dell EMC products, combining hardware and software for seamless user experience in the AI era.
Dell ObjectScale implements the S3 protocol, integrating smoothly with Dell EMC solutions like ISILON. Its architecture supports data compression and interoperates with multiple protocols for enhanced performance. Enterprise features include immutability, geo-replication, and user-friendly management. However, it needs better integration with other systems, enhanced security, and disaster recovery. Write performance and scalability improvements, competitive pricing, and documentation enhancements are key areas for progress. The interface could be more straightforward, with more remote management features and native analytics.
What features does Dell ObjectScale offer?Industries leverage Dell ObjectScale for cloud-based object storage, archiving, and backups. It's favored for unstructured data management, CCTV integration, and document archiving. Strong in data analytics, it integrates well with high-capacity applications, enhancing data retention strategies across fields.
We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.