We performed a comparison between Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) and Azure Data Lake Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Storage solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can run code and deploy it whenever we want."
"The product's initial setup phase is easy, as per the configurations."
"The initial setup was straightforward."
"I appreciate Amazon's extensive range of services, which makes it a favorable choice."
"The solution is scalable."
"The solution's technical support is good."
"We are not that big of a cloud user. We just use it for the storage of our bytes. The most valuable aspect is the storage."
"EFS is flexible."
"Azure Data Lake Storage is a user-friendly and easy-to-learn solution."
"It's a cloud-based tool within the Microsoft ecosystem, offering many benefits for data handling."
"The tool's most valuable feature is security access policies."
"I also like its speed. It's basically built on Azure Blob Storage, which was already fast. But Azure Data Lake Storage adds the hierarchical structure for even better performance."
"The response time and quality offered by the support team are good."
"Specifically, when it comes to the file system for the learning system, we encountered performance issues with both Azure and AWS."
"It could be better in connecting with Windows Server instances."
"The lack of transparency in the costs attached to the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"When we faced some issues, the support team took a lot of time to resolve them."
"Around 80 percent of the features of Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) are available on Linux and not in Windows, making it a major drawback of the product."
"It should be simplified. There are people who don't have cloud experience. It should be storage that we are able to just connect to."
"The product's stability has some shortcomings where improvements are required."
"The interface seems strange and complicated."
"From an SAP perspective, direct connectivity to SAP systems is an area that could be enhanced."
"Some terminology is not easy to understand when using some interfaces."
"The solution needs to improve APIs and make them more accessible."
"Pricing is always a factor. It could be more affordable."
"The high price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
More Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is ranked 5th in Cloud Storage with 10 reviews while Azure Data Lake Storage is ranked 15th in Cloud Storage with 5 reviews. Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is rated 8.6, while Azure Data Lake Storage is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) writes "Offers integration capabilities that improve areas like storage and security". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Azure Data Lake Storage writes "User-friendly and helps aggregate all information into one particular environment". Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is most compared with Microsoft Azure File Storage, Google Cloud Storage, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, Amazon S3 Glacier and Azure NetApp Files, whereas Azure Data Lake Storage is most compared with . See our Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs. Azure Data Lake Storage report.
See our list of best Cloud Storage vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
