"When it comes to valuable features, ease of use would be number one."
"Its elasticity and flexible pricing are the most valuable. For Amazon EFS, you are charged based on the storage. It is also very fast and stable with a very simple and intuitive interface."
"I think performance can be improved."
"It could be better in connecting with Windows Server instances."
More Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) is ranked 14th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 1 review while Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is ranked 8th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 1 review. Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) is rated 8.0, while Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) writes "Robust block-storage service that's easy to use and accessible from anywhere". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) writes "A fast, stable, and scalable solution with flexible pricing and good elasticity". Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) is most compared with Microsoft Azure Block Storage, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, Amazon S3 Glacier, Microsoft Azure File Storage and Google Cloud Storage Nearline, whereas Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is most compared with Microsoft Azure File Storage, Google Cloud Storage, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, Google Cloud Storage Nearline and Microsoft Azure Object Storage.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.