Aerospike Database 7 vs MongoDB Enterprise Advanced comparison

Aerospike and MongoDB are both solutions in the NoSQL Databases category. Aerospike is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.0, while MongoDB is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2. Aerospike holds a 3.5% mindshare in ND, compared to MongoDB’s 15.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Aerospike users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of MongoDB users who would recommend it.

Aerospike Database 7

Read 1 Aerospike Database 7 review

565 Views
514 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Read 81 MongoDB Enterprise Advanced reviews

4,418 Views
3,004 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Aerospike Database 7

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 31, 2025

Aerospike Database 7 and MongoDB Enterprise Advanced compete in the database storage market. Aerospike appears to have the upper hand due to its pricing and rapid deployment.

Features: Aerospike Database 7 offers robust scalability, excellent performance for high-throughput applications, and speed. MongoDB Enterprise Advanced provides a rich querying feature set, aggregation, and indexing, beneficial for complex applications.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Aerospike Database 7 is known for its straightforward, rapid deployment and responsive customer service. MongoDB Enterprise Advanced offers a more complex deployment, but extensive resources and documentation support this process.

Pricing and ROI: Aerospike Database 7 has a lower initial setup cost and quicker ROI due to efficient resource utilization. MongoDB Enterprise Advanced involves higher initial costs, but its extensive feature set offers substantial long-term ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed NoSQL Databases Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

NoSQL Databases

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 864,574 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Aerospike Database 7

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (5th), Managed NoSQL Databases (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the NoSQL Databases category, the mindshare of Aerospike Database 7 is 3.5%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MongoDB Enterprise Advanced is 15.1%, down from 25.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NoSQL Databases

Featured Reviews

Manikandan Gunasekaran

Director of Engineering at Ola

Boost authentication and session management with reliable and fast data handling

There is a lot of technical debt in our company, and we need to update to the latest versions. The lack of automation in upgrading clusters from development to production is a concern. A tool for automatically handling such upgrades would reduce operational huddle. Additionally, it would be beneficial if Aerospike had a community version to encourage broader adoption and experimentation.

Read full review

Uzair Faruqi

Head Of Analytics at Mjunction Services

Transforms data flow with adaptable schema and smooth public cloud deployment

One of our business units uses MongoDB, and we developed an ETL pipeline that extracts data from MongoDB and transfers it into our data warehouse MongoDB is a NoSQL database that is similar to a document database. It offers flexibility in schema adaptation, allowing us to change the schema and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It shows better compression and compaction, which is valuable."

"MongoDB is flexible and it allows other applications to be added."

"We haven't had any issues with stability."

"MongoDB stores the JSON data, and it's easy for me to understand because I'm a JavaScript Developer."

"MongoDB has many good replication features and good performance."

"It is very fast - faster than an SQL or MySQL Server."

"The most valuable features of MongoDB are we have a lot of documentation and SQL-based applications that run on it."

"The aggregation framework is really good, allowing a developer to build very complex queries."

"Easier to maintain the data with its document-based storage."

More MongoDB Enterprise Advanced pros

Cons

"The lack of automation in upgrading clusters from development to production is a concern."

"I would recommend MongoDB as part of a template if anyone is considering free and open-source templating services such as LibreNMS, but as a standalone, I couldn't advise."

"There was a need for integrating relational database capabilities, however, MongoDB has introduced a relational converter that allows conversion between SQL and NoSQL."

"The MongoDB documentation can be a little complicated sometimes."

"The analytics needs improvement."

"It would help if MongoDB offered a light solution for small projects."

"MongoDB would be improved with more integration, particularly for cloud environments like Google BigQuery."

"MongoDB should be more stable, and support should be more efficient."

"It could be more stable. It would be better if it were more user-friendly like Oracle, which is very easy. For example, creating an index is simple in Oracle. In MongoDB, it's quite challenging to do that. Performance could be better. It's fast and good, but you cannot put every application that you would like to in MongoDB."

More MongoDB Enterprise Advanced cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We use around half a TB of data and spend approximately $36,000 to $40,000 USD per year on Aerospike."

"The pricing is normal. Price-wise, the product is not too much expensive."

"It is rather expensive."

"At the moment, all customers are using the community version."

"MongoDB has a free version. You can also buy the enterprise edition, which is cheaper than Oracle."

"If you want support with the solution you will need to purchase a license and not use the open-source version. The license is a little expensive."

"You only have to pay for the paid version, not the open-source version."

"There is an enterprise license and it could be cheaper. We are using the free open source version."

"The product is affordable."

More MongoDB Enterprise Advanced pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

864,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

12%

University

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Aerospike Database 7?

We use around half a TB of data and spend approximately $36,000 to $40,000 USD per year on Aerospike.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Aerospike Database 7?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Aerospike Database 7?

Aerospike is mainly used as the first step for authentication, authorization, and session persistence in our organization. It is a critical part of our workflow, as without it, we wouldn't be able ...

See all answers

What do you like most about MongoDB?

MongoDB's approach to handling data in documents rather than traditional tables has been particularly beneficial.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MongoDB?

We pay approximately 2,000 euros per month for MongoDB.

See all answers

What needs improvement with MongoDB?

I'm not sure about the documentation or the knowledge bases available for MongoDB because I don't interact with it at that level, but I would say it's minimal and could be improved. I am not experi...

See all answers

Comparisons

ScyllaDB vs Aerospike Database 7

Compared 28% of the time

Neo4j Graph Database vs Aerospike Database 7

Compared 13% of the time

Apache HBase vs Aerospike Database 7

Compared 12% of the time

SingleStore vs Aerospike Database 7

Compared 11% of the time

Cassandra vs Aerospike Database 7

Compared 11% of the time

More Aerospike Database 7 Competitors

InfluxDB vs MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Compared 10% of the time

Couchbase Enterprise vs MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Compared 7% of the time

Milvus vs MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Compared 7% of the time

Cassandra vs MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Compared 5% of the time

More MongoDB Enterprise Advanced Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NoSQL Databases

July 2025

Download Aerospike Database 7 product report

Buyer's Guide

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

July 2025

Download MongoDB Enterprise Advanced product report

Overview

Aerospike is an enterprise-class, NoSQL database solution for real-time operational applications that delivers predictable performance at scale, superior uptime, and high availability at the lowest Total Cost of Ownership compared to first-generation NoSQL and relational databases.

Aerospike

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced is a comprehensive platform renowned for its scalability, user-friendliness, and high performance, underpinned by its flexible document-based storage and open-source model. JSON compatibility, clustering, and security elevate its standing among professionals.

The platform facilitates efficient data management through developer-friendly tools and a strong aggregation framework. MongoDB’s no-schema requirement, supported by community expertise, underlines its adaptability. While its sharding capabilities and affordably support large data volumes, there are aspects such as security enhancement and enterprise tool integration that need attention. Indexing and query optimization pose challenges, alongside high costs. Improvements in analytics and UI could advance its infrastructure further.

What are the key features of MongoDB Enterprise Advanced?

Scalability: Dynamic adjustments to workloads with ease.
JSON Compatibility: Seamless data structuring with JSON support.
Clustering: Enhanced data management through robust clustering.
Security Integration: Built-in security measures for data protection.
Sharding: Efficient distribution of large datasets.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Document-Based Storage: Flexibility in managing varied data types.
Open-Source: Access to a broad community and resources.
Low-Cost Implementation: Economic efficiency in deployment.
Scalability: Supports the growth of data without sacrificing performance.

Industries leverage MongoDB Enterprise Advanced for significant roles in data storage within IoT platforms, healthcare apps, public service monitoring, and big data analytics. Companies in logistics and telecommunications find it instrumental for business process management and video content management, benefiting from its seamless integration and unstructured data support.

MongoDB

Sample Customers

AppNexus, Adform, KAYAK, Williams-Sonoma Inc., The Trade Desk, GREE, BlueKai, Chango CTO, InMobi, Yashi, eXelate CTO, Snapdeal, adMarketplace, Tapad, Komli Media, Neustar, So-net Media Networks, IMHO Vi, Vizury

Facebook, MetLife, City of Chicago, Expedia, eBay, Google

Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, ScyllaDB, Microsoft and others in NoSQL Databases. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

864,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.

We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.